alexa The Gynecological Surgery of Jehovah´s Witnesses | OMICS International
ISSN: 2161-0932
Gynecology & Obstetrics
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

The Gynecological Surgery of Jehovah´s Witnesses

Milan Kudela*, Petr Dzvincuk, Radim Marek, Karel Huml, Pavel Hejtmanek and Radovan Pilka

Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic

*Corresponding Author:
Prof. Milan Kudela
Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika LF UP a FN
I.P.Pavlova 6, 775 20 Olomouc, Czech Republic
Tel: 00420 58 585 4624
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date May 08, 2015; Accepted date May 28, 2015; Published date June 04, 2015

Citation: Kudela M, Dzvincuk P, Marek R, Huml K, Hejtmanek P, et al. (2015) The Gynecological Surgery of Jehovah´s Witnesses. Gynecol Obstet (Sunnyvale) 5:297. doi: 10.4172/2161-0932.1000297

Copyright: © 2015 Kudela M, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Gynecology & Obstetrics


Objective: To present our experience with the surgical treatment of various diseases in patients belonging to the Church of Jehovah´s witnesses. Methods: The study included 34 patients belonging to the Church of Jehovah´s witnesses who rejected blood transfusion. The operations on these patients were performed for malignant and benign disorders that could not be treated by conservative therapeutic procedures. Results: The operation records were evaluated according to a set of criteria including the type of surgical procedure estimated amount of blood loss, postoperative complications and the outcome of surgical treatment. The lest amount blood loss was secured by the robotic surgery. Conclusion: Jehovah´s witnesses represent a risk group of patients because of their refusal of blood transfusion. Indication for the operation and its performance represent serious decision steps that are always associated with a certain degrese of risk. However when the principles of bloodless surgery are followed the therapeutic results are very good and in the properly indicated cases the scope of risk is acceptable.


Jehovah´s witnesses; Operations; Bloodless surgery; Robotic surgery


The Church of Jehovah´s witnesses has almost 8 millions of followers around the the world. Their number in the Czech Republic is estimated at approximately 13000 people. The most famous and debatable principle of their faith is refusal of blood transfusions. Similar to other women female Jehovah´s witnesses experience gynecological problems that often cannot effectively be treated conservatively resulting in the need for a surgical solution. This presents a serious challenge for the gynecologist who has to decide either to operate under these conditions or to not operate because of risk of potential bleeding complications which may have fatal consequences.

The adherence to the rules of minimally invasive procedures usually also means minimal blood loss. Nevertheless, it is not possible to exclude unexpected complications during surgery that may result in significant blood loss and a critical need to restore blood circulation. Though the principles of bloodless surgery are generally accepted and can usually prevent heavy bleeding, it is not completely possible to rule out situations in which the decisions treted to transfusion may result in a question of life or death.

Materials and Methods

Our study group includes 34 women who belonged to the Church of Jehovah´s Witnesses and were admitted for surgery to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the University Hospital in Olomouc, from 2007 to 2014. In agreement with their faith all women signed the Informed Consent form which included an unambiguous rejection of receiving blood or blood derivatives. All patients underwent medical examination and anesthesiology consultation before the surgery. The surgical treatment was always the only option or the most optimal alternative of treatment. All operations were provided by standard surgical procedures and techniques routinely used at the department with an emphasis on blood sparing techniques. All operations were performed by one of three experienced surgeons. The patient´s ages ranged from 42 to 72 years with a mean age of 54 years. The indication for the surgery was gynecological cancer in nine cases and the remaining 25 patients suffered from benign gynecologic diseases including uterine fibroids, uterine or vaginal prolapse, chronic metrorrhagia, urinary incontinence or endometrial polyps. Three operations for malignant gynecologic tumors were performed by robotic surgery. The patient´s consent to publish appropriate data was given orally.


No significant complications were observed during the surgery. Postoperative recovery was favorable in all cases. The hospital stay of the study patients did not differ from that of other patients. There was no need for blood transfusion.

Table 1 shows the diagnoses, surgical procedures and estimated blood loss during the operations.

Patient No Pathology Type of surgery Estimated blood loss (ml) PreoperativveHb(g/l) Postoperative Hb (g/l) Hb difference (g/l)
1 POP VH 100 120 100 20
2 leiomyoma LAVH, BSO 150 102 87 15
3 leiomyoma LAVH 150 120 103 17
4 ovarian cancer AH, BSO, OE, APE 300 143 101 42
5 leiomyoma LAVH 250 120 108 12
6 metrorrhagia HSC, D and C 10 142 142 0
7 leiomyoma LAVH 250 117 104 13
8 POP VH, Vaginal repair 250 143 112 31
9 POP VH, Vaginal repair 30 139 118 21
10 SUI VHY, Vaginal repair, TOT 100 124 114 10
11 leiomyoma LAVH 50 92 88 4
12 endometrial polyp HSC, D and C 10 140 140 0
13 metrorrhagia LSC, HSC, D and C 10 140 135 5
14 POP VH, Vaginal repair 100 140 120 20
15 endometrial cancer AH, BSO, 150 140 119 21
16 ovarian cancer AH,OE, APE 150 122 108 14
17 cervical cancer RTLH, BSO, LYP 20 116 89 27
18 leiomyoma AH, BSO, 300 145 126 19
19 endometrial cancer RTLH, BSO,LYP,LYPA 20 137 112 25
20 leiomyoma AH 150 122 80 42
21 endometrial cancer RTLH, BSO, LYP,LYPA 350 143 122 21
22 leiomyoma AH, BSO 150 120 100 20
23 endometrial polyp HSC, D and C 10 130 130 0
24 endometrial cancer AH, BSO, LYP 300 120 99 21
25 leiomyoma VH 40 154 140 14
26 metrorrhagia HSC, D and C 10 117 115 2
27 ovarian cancer BSO, OE, debulking 100 120 99 21
28 leiomyoma LSC myomectomy 250 130 126 4
29 metrorrhagia HSC, D and C 0 110 108 2
30 POP VH, Vaginal repair 150 130 125 5
31 leiomyoma AH 250 115 105 10
32 POP VH 80 135 128 7
33 POP VH, Vaginal repair 90 138 130 8
34 metrorrhagia HSC, D and C 10 112 110 2

Table 1: The diagnoses, surgical procedures and estimated blood loss during the operations. LAVH: Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy, HSC: Hysteroscopy, BSO: Bilateral salpingo oophorectomy, TOT: Tension free transobturator vaginal tape, VH: vaginal hysterectomy, AH :abdominal hysterectomy, OE: Omentectomy, APE: Appendectomy, LSC: Laparoscopy, RTLH: Robot assisted total laparoscopic, LYP: Pelvic lymphadenectomy, LYPA: Paraaortic lymphadenectomy, SUI: Stress Urinary Inkontinence, POP: Pelvic organ prolapse.


During a professional career almost every gynecologist responsible for surgery has encountered a patient belonging to the Church of Jehovah´s witnesses who requested an operation without blood transfusion. This situation always results in many questions to be answered. The real need for blood transfusion during the planned surgical procedure is in most cases rather small, but every surgeon remembers situations where an apparently simple operation suddenly became complicated by unexpected heavy bleeding. The surgeon then has to decide how to proceed in such a situation. Legal regulations in different countries usually dictate how to proceed but there are still several questions that remain unanswered. The decision of how to address such patients depends on the personal opinion, responsibility and individual approach of the surgeon.

The Professional and Ethical Codex of the Czech Medical Chamber (Article 2, paragraph 5, No. 10) allows the surgeon to decline a request to operate on a patient refusing blood transfusion when the surgery is a planned not urgent procedure [1]. On the other hand it is an ethical and moral problem to refuse to operate on a patient, especially when the surgical treatment is the only or by far the most optimal course of treatment and the alternative non-surgical conservative treatment will not have a guaranteed acceptable result. However, it is very unethical if a surgeon refuses to operate on such patients particulary if sarcastic comments are made that offend the patient´s faith. We have been operating on Jehovah´s witnesses in our department for several years such that these patients frequently seek out our department for help. However this does not mean that we admit all patients who request that we perform an operation without blood transfusion. A thorough and responsible consideration of the most suitable treatment is an elementary requirement. An alternative conservative therapy that will bring similar results, must be always preferred. However, in many cases the surgical approach is the only possible therapeutic solution or at least the one that bringst far better benefit than other treatment modalities. In all cases we have to consider all risks of the planned surgical procedure and then carry out the operation only if the potential risk is acceptable.

A difficult situation may arise if a gynecologist meets a young patient with chronic menometrorrhagia resulting in severe sideropenic anemia. All efforts to control the excessive bleeding using conservative treatment failed and surgery is the only reasonable solution [2]. On the other hand, is it possible to risk general anesthesia and surgery on a patient suffering from severe or even critical anemia? The contemporary sophisticated surgical and anesthesiological techniques used by a skilled and experienced surgeon guarantee the performance of most routine operations with acceptable risk. There are only a few very complicated and high risk cases where surgery is not justified [3- 6].

The current operative techniques are primarily aimed not only at stopping and controlling bleeding but at preventing it. Almost all surgical procedures now can be performed without heavy bleeding and the need of transfusion [7-9]. The only exceptions are some extremely challenging operations such as organ transplantations or extensive operations for advanced malignant tumors.

The opposite extreme is the excessively self-confident uncritical surgeon who feels able to manage all possible dangerous complications. It is also irresponsible to indicate surgery in cases that are clearly or even marginally inoperable. The failure of such surgery with possibly fatal consequences would mean a tragedy not only for the patient but also for the conscience of the surgeon. In case of an unsuccessful tretment a well-formulated and signed negative informed consent may give the surgeon some protection against possible legal suits but it does not solve all of the potential problems. Nevertheless, it is always an essential and necessary part of the medical documentation [1,10]. The determination of which surgical procedure and technique are best for surgery on Jehovah´s Witnesses is relatively easy. They should be operated in the same way and with the same care as for any other patients. Unnecessary blood loss is always harmful for any patient not only for Jehovah´s witnesses. Blood transfusion is then only a final resort in case of life threatening bleeding. Bleeding and unnecessary blood loss are in many cases avoidable and often are caused by inexperience or carelessness of the surgeon. Blood transfusion itself always presents a certain health risk and inappropriate use has negative financial consequencies as well [11]. Appart from the replacement of acute blood loss no other positive therapeutic effects have been proven so far for transfusion in surgical patients. Our group of 34 Jehovah´s witnesses who were operated on in our department is not large enough to give statistically significant results. The sample consists of patients with various diagnosis who underwent various surgical procedures ranging from simple hysteroscopy to radical operations for gynecological malignancies. The most suitable operation for gynecological malignancies seems to be a robotic surgery. Compared with classical surgery the robotic procedure results in lower blood loss [12].


The results of the treatments of our group of 34 female Jehovah´s witnesses show that these patients can be safely operated without the need for blood transfusion. Prerequisit for successful treatment with acceptable minimal risk are the responsible indication for operation and the operation being performed by a skilled surgeon. The minimally invasive blood sparing operational techniques should be preferred. In severe complicated cases such as gynecological malignant tumors the robotic surgery should be preferred because it results in minimal blood loss. It is also important to fullfil all legal formalities including the patient´s preopartively signed Negative Informed Consent refusing blood transfusion.


The study was supported by the grant from the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic No. NT 13566-4/2012.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

  • 2nd World Congress on Embryology and In Vitro Fertilization March 30-31, 2018 Orlando, USA. Theme: Exploring the Novel Research & Techniques in Reproductive Health
    March 30-31, 2018 Orlando, USA
  • World Congress on Gynecology and Obstetrics
    April 16-17, 2018 Dubai, UAE
  • 7th International Conference on Clinical and Medical Case Reports June 01-02, 2018 Osaka, Japan Theme: Focusing the breakthroughs of case reports in Clinical & Medical Research
    June 01-02, 2018 Osaka, Japan
  • 7th International Conference and Exhibition on Surgery June 21-23, 2018 Dublin, Ireland Theme: Advancements and Endeavours in the Field of Surgery
    June 21-23, 2018 Dublin, Ireland Dublin, Ireland
  • Annual Congress on Research and Innovations in Medicine July 02-03, 2018 Bangkok, Thailand Theme: Current Research and Innovations in Medicine to Improve Human Health
    July 02-03, 2018 Bangkok, Thailand
  • International Conference on Medical and Health Science August 24-25, 2018 Tokyo, JAPAN Theme: Scrutinize the Modish of Medical and Health Science
    August 24-25, 2018 Tokyo, Japan
  • World Summit on Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery Sep 10-11, 2018 Singapore Theme: Expanding new horizons in Trauma and Surgery
    Sep 10-11, 2018 Singapore City, Singapore
  • 6th American Gynecological Surgery Conference September 28-29, 2018 San Antonio | Texas | USA
    September 28-29, 2018 San Antonio, USA
  • World Congress on Fetal and Maternal Medicine October 15-17, 2018 Osaka, Japan Theme: A New Beginning on Fetal, Maternal & Neonatal Medicine
    October 15-17, 2018 Osaka, Japan
  • International Conference on Reproduction and Fertility October 18-19, 2018 Abu Dhabi, UAE
    October 18-19, 2018 Abu Dhabi, UAE

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11978
  • [From(publication date):
    June-2015 - Mar 17, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8204
  • PDF downloads : 3774

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version