alexa The Impact of M1775K Variant in BRCA1 Regulation

ISSN: 2161-1025

Translational Medicine

The Impact of M1775K Variant in BRCA1 Regulation

Ioannis Drikos1* and Effrossyni Boutou2
1Pediatric Clinic, Thriasio General Hospital of Elefsina, Greece
2Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Thalassaemia and Hemoglobinopathies Center, Laiko General Hospital, Greece
*Corresponding Author: Ioannis Drikos, Pediatric Clinic, Thriasio General Hospital of Elefsina, Magoula 196 00, Greece, Tel: +2105563292, Email: [email protected]

Received Date: Oct 13, 2017 / Accepted Date: Nov 07, 2017 / Published Date: Nov 22, 2017

Abstract

The missense mutations of the BRCT domain of human BRCA1 have been argued to be associated with predisposition to hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Mutations at the C-terminus of the protein are critical for function and structural excellence. This mutation has been associated with changes in the structure of the protein and loss of interaction with other peptides involved in cell cycle control. In previous studies we have shown that the modification of various mutants in BRCT domain, such as Met1775K is strongly affecting the functional and structural integrity of the domain and the binding affinity with phospopeptides.
In the present study we have attempted to determine the effect of the M1775K mutation on the intracellular localization of the protein. For this purpose, GFPBRCA1-BRCT M1775K mutant was created and expressed in MCF-7 cell lines. Due to fluorescence microscopy determined that the mutation affects the protein’s mislocalization in relation to wtBRCA1-BRCT protein. Mutant EGFP-BRCA1-BRCT M1775K form is mainly determined in the cytoplasm in contrast to the EGFPwtBRCA1-BRCT protein that localizes into nucleus and cytoplasm.
Cytoplasmic mislocalization of M1775K mutation, presented here, may be related to disruption of BRCA1-BRCT folding. The M1775K mutation influences the nuclear transport of BRCA1-BRCT domain to the nucleus, suggesting that the impact of the integrity of the BRCA1-BRCT domain is crucial in functional and structural level.

Keywords: Cancer; Phospopeptides; Mutation

Introduction

Breast cancer gene, BRCA1 , is one of the well-studied genes. Many mutations of BRCA1 have been identified, several of which are located in the BRCA1- BRCT domain. The particular functional significance of the BRCA1- BRCT region may be determined by involvement of cell cycle control and interaction with other proteins such as BRIP1 and DNA helicase BACH1 [1].

M1775K is a rare variant of the BRCA1- BRCT domain appears to be critical for BRCA1 function and structural integrity. The M1775K mutation disrupts the pocket phosphopeptide binding of the BRCA1 BRCT domain, thereby inhibiting the BRCA1 interaction with the BRIP1 and CtIP proteins. These results indicate that the integrity of BRCT is critical to BRCA1 function. BRCA1 has two domains involved in protein-protein interactions which are often mutated in human cancers: the N terminal RING domain and the two BRCT sequential domains at the C-terminal end of the protein. The structure of the carboxy terminal domain of BRCA1 consists of two identical BRCT repeats each containing 90 amino acids [2,3].

Each repeat of BRCT folds forming a parallel quadrilateral beta sheet located in the central part of the field, surrounded by three α- helices. The C-terminal BRCT regions are believed to mediate BRCA1 transcriptional activity [2,3]. The most frequently detected mutations occur within the BRCT domains and have been reported to affect the BRCA1 nuclear functions, including DNA repair [1] and transcriptional activity [4]. It has previously been shown that BRCT mutations: (i) have affected field folding in vitro to varying degrees depending on the induced destabilization; and (ii) have abrogated binding affinity of the BRCT region with synthetic phosphopeptides such as pBACH1/ BRIP1 and pCtIP, affecting the structural integrity of the active BRCT sites involved in interaction with the partner molecules [5,6].

While the structural implications of many BRCA1- BRCT protein mutants have already been studied, the effect of these mutations on the localization of the protein at the cellular level has been determined only for a few of them [7]. The BRCA1 mutations may alter BRCA1 localization and restrict the protein out of the core. Two of the Cterminal mutations (M1775R and Y1853X) restrict nuclear localization disrupt the folding of the C-terminal of BRCA1 [7-9], suggesting that the conformation changes they cause may be detrimental to BRCA1 nuclear transport [6,10].

Methods

Mutagenesis and plasmid construction

The EGFP-BRCA1 fusion construct containing the full length BRCA1 cDNA [11,12] in-frame with an EGFP-containing vector (pEGFP-C3, Clontech Laboratories, Inc.), was kindly provided by Dr. Ody Sibon [11]. To assess the impact of BRCA1 cancer mutation on subcellular localization used PCR-based mutagenesis to create BRCA1 mutant cDNA corresponding to the detected M1775K BRCA1- BRCT mutation. Mutagenesis was performed by the system QuickChange (Stratagene), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The variant in pEGFP-C3 -BRCA1 demonstrated by site-directed mutagenesis. Then inserted by substituting restriction fragments into wild-type BRCA1 by using appropriate restriction enzymes (pEGFP-C3- BRCA1 wt). The mutant’s integrity was determined by DNA sequencing.

Cell culture and transfection conditions

MCF-7 human breast cancer cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s media (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and grown at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. Cells were transfected with the eukaryotic expression vector pEGFPC3 carrying the BRCA1- BRCT cDNA (mutant and wt) fused to EGFP. Cells were transfected at about 70% confluency (optical) with 1-2 μg of plasmid DNA per well of 6 well plate, using Lipofectamine Reagent (Life Technologies), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Transfected cells were cultured for 16 h post-transfection and subsequently analyzed by immunofluorescence.

Immunofluorescence microscopy

Cells expressing EGFP-tagged protein were fixed in 4% Paraformaheldyde in PBS for 20 min at room temperature, washed three times in PBS, stained with the DNA binding dye Hoechst 33285 (Sigma) (cell nuclei staining), washed in PBS, followed by a final wash in ddH2O and then mounted in fluorescence preservative solution for direct detection of the EGFP fluorescence.

Results

Subcellular localization of fusion EGFP-BRCA1-BRCT mutant and wtBRCA1

In order to assess the proteins mislocalization BRCT fused to GFP (GFPBRCA1 - BRCT- M1775K mutant) which inserted in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. The expressed fusion proteins were detected by fluorescence microscopy and the transfection efficacy was about 30%. The EGFP-BRCA1 -wild type seems to have nuclear-cytoplasmic distribution. Based on these observations, examined the effect of BRCA1- BRCT M1775K cancerrelated mutation in the protein’s subcellular localization and its nuclear entry capacity. Based on its location, the selected BRCT mutation is located at crucial region of the BRCT domain function.

M1775K is located, at the interface region directly affecting the BACH1/ BRIP1 and CtIP phosphopeptide binding pocket as we have already mentioned. In accordance with previously reported findings, the calorimetric results support the hypothesis that thermal unfolding mechanisms mainly involve the hydrophobic inter-BRCT-repeat interface [5,6]. The M1775K missense variant is referred not to bind the synthetic phosphopeptides pBACH1/BRIP1 or pCtIP.

Structural analysis of the interatomic interactions of Lys1775 shows a direct clash of its side chain with Phe13 of either phosphopeptide, a result arising from the disruption of the BRCT-phosphopeptide binding pocket [5]. Based on these results the potential effect of mutant in the sub-cellular localization of the protein determined by using a construct expression of BRCA1 fused to EGFP in MCF-7 breast cancer epithilioma cells. As expected from structural and biochemical results, M1775K localized mostly in the cytoplasm in all cells examined, regardless cell cycle phase (dividing cells) whereas wtBRCA1 detected in cytoplasm and the nucleus (Figure 1).

translational-medicine-cytoplasm-cells-nuclei

Figure 1: The M1775K variant of the BRCA1- BRCT domain has already been classified as a destabilizing mutation. BRCA1- M1775K mutant seems restricted to the cytoplasm by comparing images of cytoplasm with cells nuclei (detected by Hoechst).

Discussion

Mutant M1775K is crucial for BRCT domain integrity and protein’s localization. This residue is located near to the binding site with CtIP and BACH1, at the interface region of BRCT and affects through hydrophobic interactions the structural and functional integrity of the domain [6,13]. Fusion EGFP-BRCA1 protein M1775K is localized from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, demonstrating a similar impact on nuclear localization with the mutation M1775R [8].

The structure of the BRCA1- BRCT mutants M1775K implies modification of the BRCT domain which may interrupt the interaction with phosphopeptides such BACH1 and CtIP, possibly affecting BRCA1 re-localization in the cell nucleus by disrupting the molecular protein complex during DNA repair processes. The CtIP protein binds to BRCA1 in a CDK-dependent manner and formation of the functional complex MRN-CtIP-BRCA1 is important for end resection to initiate HR-mediated DSB repair [14,15].

BRCA1 binds to CtIP through its BRCT domains when CtIP is phosphorylated by CDKs at Ser-327, and this interaction is believed to be important for HR [16,17]. Furthermore mutants of BRCA1 Ring disrupt protein to co-localize in nuclear foci by affecting the interaction with proteins such as BARD1 and BACH1, which are important for DNA repair. This failure occurs despite the continued ability of the RING mutant protein to interact with BARD1 and the ability of the BRCT mutant to interact with BACH1 suggesting that both RING and BRCT domains of BRCA1 are required for the functional and structural integrity of BRCA1 to the sites of DNA damage and repair [18,19] .

Our results are in accordance with the literature. For example immunohistochemical microscopy studies of human breast tumors have frequently detected a shift in BRCA1 from nucleus to cytoplasm in cancers of increasing grade and from patients carrying germ-line BRCA1 mutations [20], and similar observations have been made for breast cancer cell lines expressing mutant forms of BRCA1 [21].

According to Solyom et al. abraxas directly interacts with the BRCA1- BRCT (BRCA1 carboxyl-terminal) repeats and contributes to BRCA1 -dependent DNA damage responses. A novel heterozygous alteration, c.1082G>A (Arg361Gln), results in abrogation of nuclear localization contributing to a BRCA-centered tumor suppression [22].

Moreover, two of the BRCT mutations (M1775R and Y1853X) are known to adversely affect BRCA1 protein folding and nuclear function. The BRCT mutations reduced BRCA1 nuclear import by a mechanism consistent with altered protein folding, as indicated by the restoration of nuclear staining by more extensive C terminal deletions suggesting that BRCT mutations alter nuclear targeting of BRCA1 , and that this may contribute to the inhibition of nuclear DNA repair and transcription function [23].

Conclusion

Cytoplasmic mislocalization of M1775K BRCA1- BRCT mutant, presented here, which disrupt BRCA1 C-terminal folding according to previous studies, influence the nuclear transport of BRCA1- BRCT domain to the nucleus, suggesting that the impact of the integrity of the BRCA1- BRCT domain is crucial at the functional and structural level. Such mutations may control subcellular compartmentalization and in turn regulation of BRCA1 -related pathways and processes.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

The study was justified by the ethics committee.

Consent for Publication

Written informed consent was obtained from author. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Availability of Data and Materials

Data are available in any case requested.

Declaration of Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

There was no funding for this research

Authors’ Contributions

Drikos Ioannis, Effrosyni Boutou demonstrated the design of the study and draft the manuscript. Author approved the final manuscript.

References

Citation: Drikos I, Boutou E (2017) The Impact of M1775K Variant in BRCA1 Regulation. Transl Med (Sunnyvale) 7: 197. DOI: 10.4172/2161-1025.1000197

Copyright: © 2017 Drikos I, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Post Your Comment Citation
Share This Article
Recommended Conferences
Viewmore
Article Usage
  • Total views: 1652
  • [From(publication date): 0-2017 - Sep 26, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views: 1602
  • PDF downloads: 50

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh