The Minute Structural Difference between the Hormone hCG and the Autocrine Hyperglycosylated hCG
Received Date: Sep 18, 2017 / Accepted Date: Oct 03, 2017 / Published Date: Oct 10, 2017
Introduction: In 1997 I discovered hyperglycosylated hCG, a separate and independent molecule to the hormone hCG. The structure of hyperglycosylated hCG was also examined, it was a molecule varying from hCG by just 3 or 4 small sugar side chains, or 2.8% of molecular weight. While the hormone hCG binds a luteinizing hormone (LH)/hCG hormone receptor, hyperglycosylated hCG and its β-subunit are autocrines binding and antagonizing a TGF-β-II receptor. Here structural differences between the two molecules are investigated. Methods: Nicking or cleavage of the hormone hCG and the autocrine hyperglycosylated hCG, and dissociation of subunits were carefully investigated using sequence analysis. Results: Research showed that hyperglycosylated hCG was much more rapidly nicked or cleaved at β47-48 than the hormone hCG. And that nicked hCG was much more rapidly dissociated into subunits than non-nicked hCG. Discussion: A model was generated. As proposed, hyperglycosylated hCG is first rapidly nicked or cleaved at β47-48 and then rapidly dissociated. The nicked hyperglycosylated hCG β-subunit antagonizes the TGF-β-ll receptor. In contrast, the endocrine hCG is blocked from nicking, which limits dissociation, only intact hCG binds the LH/hCG hormone receptor.
Keywords: HCG; Hyperglycosylated hCG; TGF-β-II; Leukocyte elastase; Dissociation
Two major molecules, the hormone human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and the autocrine hyperglycosylated hCG both share the same 92 amino acid α-subunit and 145 amino acid β-subunit hCG sequences. Yet are two completely separate or very different molecules [1,2]. The hormone hCG and the autocrine hyperglycosylated hCG also share the same four N-linked oligosaccharides but different Olinked sugar structures [2,3]. The hormone hCG binds a joint hCG/ luteinizing hormone (LH) receptor, and has zero binding of a transforming growth factor-β-II (TGF-β-II) receptor. The autocrine hyperglycosylated hCG, by contrast, binds and antagonizes a TGF-β-II receptor [4-6] and has zero binding of a hormone hCG/LH receptor. How can this be? How can the receptor binding specifics be so different when the molecules are virtually the same?
The only structural difference between the hormone hCG and the autocrine hyperglycosylated hCG is in the four short O-linked sugar side chains on the β-subunit C-terminal peptide [2,3]. The hormone hCG has four type one structures “NeuAc-Gal-(NeuAc)-GalNAc-” and “NeuAc-Gal-GalNAc-”, while the autocrine hyperglycosylated hCG has three or occasionally four type two structures “NeuAc-Gal-GlcNAc- (NeuAc-Gal)-GalNAc-” and “NeuAc-Gal-GlcNAc-(Gal)-GalNAc-” [2,3]. The difference between the two types of structure, three galactose (molecular weight 162) and three N-acetylglucosamine residues (molecular weight 203), is minuscule compared to the molecular weight of hyperglycosylated hCG (39,149 daltons), it is just 2.8% of the molecular weight.
How can this miniscule structural difference, 2.8% of the molecular weight, have such a major effect on the product? The hormone which binds an LH/hCG receptor and the autocrine which binds a TGF-β-II receptor, with no cross-reactivity.
The hormone hCG primarily drives creation and maintenance of hemochorial placentation, the human fetal feeding system in pregnancy [1,7]. In addition it manages progesterone production in early pregnancy [8,9] and drives cytotrophoblast cell differentiation , attenuates pregnancy implantation , suppresses contractions during pregnancy [12,13] and suppresses maternal macrophage rejection during pregnancy [14,15]. The hormone hCG also supplements LH during the menstrual cycle [16,17] and promotes organ development in the fetus during gestation [18,19].
The autocrine hyperglycosylated hCG controls pregnancy implantation at the start of gestation [20,21]. It controls deep implantation of hemochorial placentation at the end of the first trimester of pregnancy , controls placenta growth during pregnancy  and controls malignancy by all human cancer cells [24,25].
Two extremely different molecules, a hormone that promotes growth and differentiation, and an autocrine that drives malignancy and invasion. Both molecules having the same amino acid sequence, the same N-linked oligosaccharides and being seemingly virtually identical in structure. How can this be? This is a very rare oddity of biochemistry that has confused and confounded readers for many years. It is all examined experimentally and carefully explained for the first time here.
Materials and Method
Nicking of hCG and hyperglycosylated hCG
Human leucocyte elastase action on the endocrine hCG and on hyperglycosylated hCG was examined. Experiments were conducted with 0.25 units enzyme in 60 μl 0.1 M Tris-HCl with 0.5 M NaCl, 0.1% w/w Brij 35, pH 8.5 containing 10 mM phenylmethane sulfonyl fluoride and 5 nmol hormone hCG, batch P1, not nicked or 5 nmol hyperglycosylated hCG batch C7, not nicked. Eleven micro test tubes were assembled of each mixture, and incubated for 1.0, 1.33, 1.67, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0, 12, 16, 21, 24 and 30 h. After incubation, the samples were frozen at -70°C and then tested in the service laboratory at Columbia- Presbyterian Medical Center by Edman Degradation sequence analysis. The percentage of nicked hCG molecules, having a sequence starting at Val β48, cleaved at β47-48 (sequence: Val-Leu-Pro-Ala) was determined as was the absence of other nicking demonstrated by sequence analysis (having an N-terminal sequence Val-Leu-Gln-Gly if cleaved at β43-44, having a sequence Leu-Gln-Gly-Pro if cleaved at β44-45, the two other cleavage sites).
Dissociation of non-nicked and nicked hCG
Stability of hyperglycosylated hCG standard (batch C7) and of 100% nicked hyperglycosylated hCG standard (batch C5) was investigated. C7 and C5 were dissolve in normal male serum (hCG-free) (Sigma), catalogue S2145. The normal male serum was preserved with 5x penicillin-streptomycin-fungizone. The final volume was 1.0 ml. Sample in quadruplicate were incubated at 37°C and aliquots, 0.02 ml removed at 16, 22, 29, 40, 70, 120, 200, 400, 700 and 1000 h for intact hCG measurement. Dissociation was measured using the 2119 microtiter plate immunometric assay, a test measuring only intact or only non-dissociated hCG. The assay used monoclonal antibody 2119; this is an anti α-subunit antibody. This was the capture antibody. 4001- peroxidase was tracer antibody, this is a peroxidase labelled anti-core β-subunit polyclonal antibody. Procedures are those published previously . The quantity of hCG detected by the 2119 assay was used to determine the concentration of intact or non-dissociated hCG.
Nicking or cleavage in the β39-58 amphipathic loop of the hormone hCG and the autocrine hyperglycosylated hCG was investigated. Nicking or cleavage in the β39-58 loop can be performed by the protease human leukocyte elastase [26-28]. This enzyme cleaves the hormone hCG, hCG dissociated β-subunit, hyperglycosylated hCG and hyperglycosylated hCG dissociated β-subunit in the β47-48 in the β39-58 loop [26-28].
Endocrine hCG batch P1 which is not nicked, and hyperglycosylated hCG batch C7, which is not nicked, were incubated with purified human leukocyte elastase, 0.25 units at 37°C in 0.2 μl Tris-HCl, 0.5M NaCl, pH 8.5, and incubated for 11 different time intervals (Table 1). As found, endocrine hCG batch P1 became 100% nicked after 30 h incubation at 37°C.
|Samples||Incubation time (h)||Sequence analysis
(% sequence Val-Leu-Pro)
|hCG, batch PI, not nicked, 5 nmol||1.0 h||0% nicked|
|hCG, batch PI, not nicked, 5 nmol||1.33 h||0% nicked|
|hCG, batch PI, not nicked, 5 nmol||1.67 h||0% nicked|
|hCG, batch PI, not nicked, 5 nmol||2.0 h||0% nicked|
|hCG, batch PI, not nicked, 5 nmol||4.0 h||9% nicked|
|hCG, batch PI, not nicked, 5 nmol||8.0 h||20% nicked|
|hCG, batch PI, not nicked, 5 nmol||12 h||28% nicked|
|hCG, batch PI, not nicked, 5 nmol||16 h||52% nicked|
|hCG, batch PI, not nicked, 5 nmol||21 h||89% nicked|
|hCG, batch PI, not nicked, 5 nmol||24 h||95% nicked|
|hCG, batch PI, not nicked, 5 nmol||30 h||100% nicked|
|Hyperglycosylated hCG, batch C7, not nicked, 5 nmol||1 h||43% nicked|
|Hyperglycosylated hCG, batch C7, not nicked, 5 nmol||1.33 h||74% nicked|
|Hyperglycosylated hCG, batch C7, not nicked, 5 nmol||1.67 h||100% nicked|
|Hyperglycosylated hCG, batch C7, not nicked, 5 nmol||2.0 h||100% nicked|
|Hyperglycosylated hCG, batch C7, not nicked, 5 nmol||4.0 h||100% nicked|
|Hyperglycosylated hCG, batch C7, not nicked, 5 nmol||8.0 h||100% nicked|
|Hyperglycosylated hCG, batch C7, not nicked, 5 nmol||12 h||100% nicked|
|Hyperglycosylated hCG, batch C7, not nicked, 5 nmol||16 h||100% nicked|
|Hyperglycosylated hCG, batch C7, not nicked, 5 nmol||21 h||100% nicked|
|Hyperglycosylated hCG, batch C7, not nicked, 5 nmol||24 h||100% nicked|
|Hyperglycosylated hCG, batch C7, not nicked, 5 nmol||30 h||100% nicked|
Table 1: Nicking of hCG and hyperglycosylated hCG, 0.58 nmol, by incubation with human leukocyte elastase, 0.25 units at 37°C in 0.2 ml Tris- HCl, 0.5 M NaCl, 0.1% Brij, pH 8.5.
Hyperglycosylated hCG batch C7, in contrast, was 100% nicked after a very much shorter incubation, 1.67 h or in just 1 h 40 min at 37°C. Hyperglycosylated hCG batch C7 was nicked 100% 18-fold faster than endocrine hCG batch P1, (Table 1), yet the only structural difference is in O-linked oligosaccharides at the β-subunit C-terminal peptide . In both cases, sequence analysis showed that cleavage at β47-48 was the only nicking that occurred. This is consistent with nonnicked hyperglycosylated hCG being very much more rapidly nicked than the hormone hCG.
The stability of hyperglycosylated hCG and nicked hyperglycosylated hCG were examined. Hyperglycosylated hCG standard, batch C7, not-nicked, and hyperglycosylated hCG standard batch C5, 100% nicked at β47-48 [2,3], were dissolved in normal male serum preserved with penicillin-streptomycin-fungizone in quadruplicate. Mixtures were incubated at 37°C (Table 2). Hyperglycosylated hCG standard C7 was 100% dissociated in 700 h, while hyperglycosylated hCG C5 standard was 100% dissociated in just 22 h. Nicked hyperglycosylated hCG was 100% dissociated 32x faster than non-nicked hyperglycosylated hCG standard (Table 2).
|Sample||Incubation hours||2119 Intact hCG assay
|Hyperglycosylated hCG, C7 standard, 0% nicked||200||630 ± 120 (37% dissociated)|
|Hyperglycosylated hCG, C7 standard, 0% nicked||400||380 ± 115 (62% dissociated)|
|Hyperglycosylated hCG, C7 standard, 0% nicked||700||1.2 ± 0.33 (99.8% dissociated)|
|Hyperglycosylated hCG, C5 standard, 100% nicked||16||220 ± 45 (78% dissociated)|
|Hyperglycosylated hCG, C5 standard, 100% nicked||22||0.7 ± 0.11 (99.9% dissociated)|
Table 2: Dissociation of hyperglycosylated hCG in serum. Hyperglycosylated hCG standard C7 and standard C5, 1000 ng were dissolved in control male serum in quadruplicate, with 10x penicillin– streptomycin–fungizone antibiotic and incubated at 37°C until ~100% dissociated.
This supports the concept of extremely rapid nicking of hyperglycosylated hCG and extremely rapid dissociation of hyperglycosylated hCG following nicking (Figure 1).
The research presented in this manuscript shows nicking of hyperglycosylated hCG by human leucocyte elastase, and the rapid dissociation splitting into an α-subunit and β-subunit, following nicking. Interestingly, even though the hormone hCG and the autocrine hyperglycosylated hCG are 97.2% structurally identical, leucocyte elastase cleaves hyperglycosylated hCG 18x faster that it cleaves the hormone hCG, furthermore hyperglycosylated hCG dissociates nicked hyperglycosylated hCG 32x faster than it dissociates the hormone hCG. It is concluded that hyperglycosylated hCG is nicked and dissociated into separated subunits very much faster than the hormone hCG.
Intriguingly, hyperglycosylated hCG, which is rapidly nicked and dissociated, seemingly needs to be dissociated for TGF-β-II receptor action. Studies with hCG and cancer show that cancer cells produce a hyperglycosylated hCG free β-subunit, which retains the TGF-β-II receptor binding potential and activating the TGF-β-II receptor [4,6,29]. Studies show, that while the hormone hCG has no TGF-β-II activity, that dissociated hormone hCG β-subunit has full TGF-β-II biological activity [4,24,25]. Many researchers have used dissociated hormone β-subunit to stimulate cancer cells [4,6]. It is concluded that the TGF-β-II receptor binds a dissociated hCG β-subunit and not hyperglycosylated hCG .
The hormone hCG, in contrast, which is very slowly nicked and very slowly dissociated, must not be nicked or dissociated for maximal hormone LH/hCG receptor response [26-28,30]. The receptor only binds non-nicked intact hormone hCG.
It is established that the TGF-β-II receptor binds hyperglycosylated hCG dissociation products (nicked hyperglycosylated hCG β-subunit), and hyperglycosylated hCG free β-subunit as produced by nontrophoblastic neoplasms [4,24,25]. As such, the receptor contains a β- subunit-specific binding site.
The TGF-β-II receptor binds two adjacent fingers on the TGF-β molecule terminating at Glu D55 and Glu E142 [31-33]. Examining the three-dimensional crystal structure of hCG as established by Lustbader et al. , Wu et al.  and Lapthorn et al.  analogous fingers terminating in Glu amino acids are found on both the hormone hCG and the autocrine hyperglycosylated hCG. This is β-subunit Glu residue β21 and Glu residue β65 on the adjacent fingers β17-25 and β60-75 (Figure 2). This is obvious TGF-β-II receptor binding site as bound by TGF-β and hyperglycosylated hCG free β-subunit.
Figure 2 shows the three-dimensional crystal structure of hCG as proposed by Lustbader et al. , Wu et al.  and Lapthorn et al. . This illustrates the proposed β-subunit specific binding site of the TGF-β-II receptor, adjacent to the TGF-β-II -binding fingers.
Lustbader et al. , Wu et al.  and Lapthorn et al.  all went about using X-ray crystallography to examine the three-dimensional structure of hCG. All found that they had to delete the N-linked and O-linked sugar side chains on hCG, the β-subunit C-terminal peptide and other peptide sequences before crystals could be made [33-35]. They made crystals from an hCG molecule comprising α-subunit residues 5-89 and β-subunit residues 2-111 (Figure 1) with no N- or Olinked oligosaccharides. This was just 50% of the molecule by molecular weight. This was just the root structure of the hormone hCG and the autocrine hyperglycosylated hCG and did not help resolve the difference between these two major macromolecules (Figure 2).
Butler  in England had problems with how an autocrine and a hormone emerged with one single identical amino acid sequence. To investigate this, he combined the established X-ray crystallography structures of the 50% root hCG structure [34-36] with a thermodynamic computer-model of the carbohydrate segments of hCG and the β-subunit C-terminal peptide of the hormone hCG and the autocrine hyperglycosylated hCG (not published). Figure 1 shows the complete three-dimensional structure of the hormone hCG and the autocrine hyperglycosylated hCG as proposed by Butler SA.
Intriguingly, the Butler  models explain why the hormone hCG and the autocrine hyperglycosylated hCG are so different. It explains the research findings shown here, why hyperglycosylated hCG is rapidly nicked and dissociated, and why the hormone hCG is not nicked and only slowly dissociated.
As shown by the models, the folding of the β-subunit C-terminal peptide on the hormone hCG, missing in the crystal structure [33-36], involves folding into the β39-58 loop blocking any nicking at β47-48 before terminating at β145. As dictated by the O-linked oligosaccharide differences, the C-terminal peptide on hyperglycosylated hCG did not involve such blocking (Figure 1). In many respects the research described here confirms the correctness of the Butler SA models and the Butler SA models confirm the correctness of this research (Figure 1).
These findings (Figure 1) are contrary to the published findings by Lustbader, by Wu and by Lapthorn [34-36], who predict without examining the C-terminal peptide β110-145, that this segment is independent of the molecules three-dimensional structure, protruding as a random non-folded region projecting away from the molecule. This projection is very wrong, the C-terminal peptide being an intricately folded part of the molecule that controls the molecules destiny.
The only physical difference found between the hormone hCG and the autocrine hyperglycosylated hCG is four O-linked oligosaccharides of type one on the hormone hCG, and of type two found on the autocrine hyperglycosylated hCG (Figures 1 and 2). The O-linked oligosaccharide difference on the hormone hCG must force the β- subunit C-terminal peptide to fold into loop β39-58 blocking nicking.
The seemingly correct Butler three-dimensional structures (Figure 1), shows the tiny structural difference between the two molecules, yet clearly explain the biochemistry phenomena of these two independent, separate molecules. This 2.8% molecular weight sugar difference is at the root of the only difference between the two molecules (Figure 1). It explains how we have an autocrine that binds its TGF-β-II receptor as a cleaved and dissociated nicked hyperglycosylated hCG β-subunit. And how we have a hormone that only binds its LH/hCG hormone receptor as an intact α-, β-dimer. Two very different molecules. Unless someone can find problems with the Butler three dimensional structures, which is very doubtful, they should be used as complete structures models to illustrate for the structural difference between the hormone hCG and autocrine hyperglycosylated hCG molecules.
In conclusion, we have two very different molecules, the hormone hCG (a non-nicked dimer) and the nicked/cleaved hyperglycosylated hCG β-subunit that binds the two very different receptors. Thus we explain this extreme biochemical oddity of how two molecules, and how an endocrine and an autocrine can both have identical amino acid sequences and just difference in the O-linked olugosaccharides. We have an intact hormone and a TGF-β-II autocrine of the cleaved dissociated molecule.
- Cole LA (2013) HCG and hyperglycosylated hCG, promoters of villous placenta and hemochorial placentation. Nicholson R (Edtr), Placenta: Functions, Development and Disease, Nova Publishers, pp: 155-166.
- Elliott MM, Kardana A, Lustbader JW, Cole LA (1997) Carbohydrate and peptide structure of the a- and b-subunits of human chorionic gonadotropin from normal and aberrant pregnancy and choriocarcinoma. Endocrine 7: 15-32.
- Valmu L, Alfthan H, Hotakainen K, Birken S, Stenman UH (2006) Site-specific glycan analysis of human chorionic gonadotropin beta-subunit from malignancies and pregnancy by liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry. Glycobiol 16: 1207-1218.
- Butler SA, Ikram MS, Mathieu S, Iles RK (2000) The increase in bladder carcinoma cell population induced by the free beta subunit of hCG is a result of an anti-apoptosis effect and not cell proliferation. Br J Cancer 82:1553-1556.
- Berndt S, Blacher S, Munuat C, Detilleux J, Evain-Brion D, et al. (2013) Hyperglycosylated human chorionic gonadotropin stimulates angiogenesis through TGF-ß receptor activation. Fed Am Soc Exper Biol J 27:1309-1321.
- Ahmud F, Ghosh S, Sinha S, Joshi SD, Mehta VS, et al. (2015) TGF-ß-induced hCG-ß regulates redox homeostasis in glioma cells. Mol Cell Biochem 399: 105-112.
- Cole LA (2009) HCG and hyperglycosylated hCG in the establishment of hemochorial placentation. J Reprod Immunol 82: 111-117.
- Järvelä IY, Ruokonen A, Tekay A (2008) Effect of rising hCG levels on the human corpus luteum during early pregnancy. Human Reprod 23: 2775-2781.
- Niswender GD (2002) Molecular control of luteal secretion of progesterone. Reproduction 123: 333-339.
- Shi QJ, Lei ZM, Rao CV, Lin J (1993) Novel role of human chorionic gonadotropin in differentiation of human cytotrophoblasts. Endocrinol 132: 387-395.
- Cole LA (2012) Hyperglycosylated hCG and pregnancy failures. J Reprod Immunol 93: 119-122.
- Eta E, Ambrus G, Rao V (1994) Direct regulation of human myometrial contractions by human chorionic gonadotropin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:1582-1586.
- Doheny HC, Houlihan DD, Ravikumar N, Smith TJ, Morrison JJ (2003) Human chorionic gonadotrophin relaxation of human pregnant myometrium and activation of the BKCa channel. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88: 4310-4315.
- Akoum A, Metz CN, Morin M (2005) Marked increase in macrophage migration inhibitory factor synthesis and secretion in human endometrial cells in response to human chorionic gonadotropin hormone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90: 2904-2910.
- Matsuura T, Sugimura M, Iwaki T, Ohashi R, Kanayama N, et al. (2002) Anti-macrophage inhibitory factor antibody inhibits PMSG-hCG-induced follicular growth and ovulation in mice. J Assist Reprod Genet 19: 591-595.
- Stenman UH, Alfthan H, Ranta T, Vartiainen E, Jalkanen J, et al. (1987) Serum levels of human chorionic gonadotropin in non-pregnant women and men are modulated by gonadotropin-releasing hormone and sex steroids. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 64: 730-736.
- Odell WD, Griffin J (1987) Pulsatile secretion of human chorionic gonadotropin in normal adults. N Engl J Med 317: 1688-1691.
- Goldsmith PC, McGregor WG, Raymoure WJ, Kuhn RW, Jaffe RB (1993) Cellular localization of chorionic gonadotropin in human fetal kidney and liver. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 57: 54-61.
- Abdallah MA, Lei ZM, Li X, Greenwold N, Nakajima ST, et al. (2004) Human fetal nongonadal tissues contain human chorionic gonadotropin/luteinizing hormone receptors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89: 952-956.
- Sasaki Y, Ladner DG, Cole LA (2008) Hyperglycosylated hCG the source of pregnancy failures. Fertil Steril 89:1871-1786.
- Cole LA (2007) Hyperglycosylated hCG. Placenta 28: 977-986.
- Bahado-Singh RO, Oz AU, Kingston JM, Shahabi S, Hsu CD, et al. (2002) The role of hyperglycosylated hCG in trophoblast invasion and the prediction of subsequent pre-eclampsia. Prenat Diagn 22: 478-481.
- Brennan MC, Wolfe MD, Murray-Krezan CM, Cole LA, Rayburn WF, et al. (2013) First trimester hyperglycosylated human chorionic gonadotropin and development of hypertension. Prenat Diagn 33: 1075-1079.
- Cole LA, Butler SA (2012) Hyperglycosylated hCG, hCGß and hyperglycosylated hCGß: Interchangeable cancer promoters. Mol Cell Endcrinol 349: 232-238.
- Cole LA, Butler SA. Cole LA (2015) B152 anti-hyperglycosylated human chorionic gonadotropin free β-Subunit. A new, possible treatment for cancer. J Reprod Med 60: 13-20.
- Kardana A, Cole LA (1994) Human chorionic gonadotropin ß-subunit nicking enzymes in pregnancy and cancer patient serum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79: 761-767.
- Kardana A, Elliott MM (1991) The heterogeneity of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). I. Characterization of peptide heterogeneity in 13 individual preparations of hCG. Endocrinol 129: 1541-1550.
- Cole LA, Kardana A, Andrade-Gordon P, Gawinowicz MA, Morris JC, et al. (1991) The heterogeneity of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). III. The occurrence and biological and immunological activities of nicked hCG. Endocrinol 129: 1559-1567.
- Lee CL, Chiu PC, Hautala L, Salo T, Yeung WS, et al. (2013) Human chorionic gonadotropin and its free ß-subunit stimulate trophoblast invasion independent of LH/hCG receptor. Mol Cell Endocrinol 375: 43-52.
- Cole LA (2014) HCG and hyperglycosylated hCG carbohydrate structures corrected. J Glycobiol 4: 114.
- Groppe J, Hinck CS, Samavarchi-Tehrani P, Zubieta C, Schuermann JP, et al. (2008) Cooperative assembly of TGF-ß superfamily signaling complexes is mediated by two disparate mechanisms and distinct modes of receptor binding. Mol Cell Biol 29:157-158.
- Kirsch T, Sebald W, Dreyer MK (2000) Crystal structure of the BMP-2-BRIA ectodomain complex. Nat Struct Biol 7: 492-496.
- Shimanuki T, Hara T, Furuya T, Immura T, Miyazomo K (2007) Modulation of the functional binding sites for TGF-ß on the type ll receptor leads to suppression of TGF-ß signaling. Oncogene 26: 3311-3320.
- Lustbader JW, Yarmush DL, Birken S, Puett D, Canfield R (2013) The application of chemical studies of human chorionic gonadotropin to visualize is three-dimensional structure. Endocr Rev 14: 291-310.
- Wu H, Lusbader JW, Yee L, Canfield RE, Hendriickson WA (1994) Structure of human chorionic gonadotropin at 2.6Å resolution from MAD analysis of the selenmethionyl protein. Structure 2: 545-558.
- Lapthorn AJ, Harris DC, Littlejohn A, Lustbader JW, Canfield RE, et al. (1994) Crystal structure of human chorionic gonadotropin. Nature 369: 455-462.
Citation: Cole LA (2017) The Minute Structural Difference between the Hormone hCG and the Autocrine Hyperglycosylated hCG. J Glycobiol 6: 127. Doi: 10.4172/2168-958X.1000127
Copyright: © 2017 Cole LA. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Share This Article
4thInternational Conference on Glycobiology and Glycochemistry
May 16-17, 2018 Singapore City, Singapore
11th International Conference and Exhibition on Metabolomics & Systems Biology
May 17-19, 2018 Tokyo, Japan
13th International Conference on Metabolomics and Enzymology (10 Plenary Forums - 1 Event)
May 23-24, 2018 New York, USA
4th International Conference on Glycobiology and Glycochemistry
July 16-18, 2018 Melbourne, Australia
5th International Conference on Glycobiology, Lipids & Proteomics
August 27-28, 2018 Toronto, Canada
4th Glycobiology World Congress
September 17-19, 2018 Rome, Italy
- Total views: 1371
- [From(publication date): 0-2017 - Apr 23, 2018]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 1328
- PDF downloads: 43