Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Urmia University, Iran

- Corresponding Author:
- Hossein Sheykhlou

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Technical Education Faculty, Urmia University

Urmia, West Azerbaijan 57561-15311, Iran

**Tel:**09149941762

**E-mail:**[email protected]

**Received date:** October 04, 2015; **Accepted date:** January 06, 2016; **Published date:** January 12, 2016

**Citation:** Sheykhlou H (2016) Thermodynamic Analysis of a Combined Brayton and Rankine Cycle based on Wind Turbine. J Fundam Renewable Energy Appl 6:203. doi:10.4172/2090-4541.1000203

**Copyright:** © 2016 Sheykhlou H. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

**Visit for more related articles at** Journal of Fundamentals of Renewable Energy and Applications

This paper presents the thermodynamic study of a heat and power system which combines an organic Rankine cycle and a gas turbine (GT) cycle. The required power of the compressor in the GT cycle and pump in the Rankine cycle is provided by the WT which according to the amount of cycle required power. For analysis of the cycle, a simulation has been performed using R123 as the working fluid in the Rankine cycle and air and combustion products in the GT cycle. In this end, effect of various parameters such as wind speed, the angular speed of WT, and the gas turbine inlet temperature as well as the compressor pressure ratio, gas turbine isentropic efficiency, condenser temperature and compressor isentropic efficiency on the total thermal efficiency and total exergy efficiency is calculated and analyzed. Thermal efficiency and exergy efficiency of 21.31% and 23.54% is obtained. Also, it is observed that the greatest exergy destruction occurs in the combustion chamber.

Wind turbine; Combined cycle; Rankine/Brayton; Exergy; First and second laws

Excessive use of **fossil** fuels has led to more environmental problems
such as global worming atmospheric pollution, ozone depletion. Use
of renewable energy sources such as wind energy, solar energy rather
than fossil fuels can prevent of global warming. Renewable energy is
abundant and its technologies are well established to provide complete
security of energy supply [1]. Combined cycles are an important tools
for energy production which are used in various forms. Combined
cycles are flexible, reliable, economical and environmental protection.
Several researchers have investigated the performance of power systems
using these various heat sources and various power drivers [2-8].
Khaliq et al. [9] analyzed the reheat combined Brayton/Rankine power
cycle. They used the second-law approach for the thermodynamic
analysis of cycle and investigated the effect of parameters such as
pressure ratio, cycle temperature ratio, number of reheats and cycle
pressure-drop on the combined cycle performance. Their simulation
results showed that the greatest exergy destruction occur in the
combustion chamber. Wang et al. [10] proposed the new combined
power and ejector–absorption refrigeration cycle that could produce
both power output and refrigeration output simultaneously. Khaljani
et al. [11] proposed the heat and power combined cycle combines a
gas turbine (GT) and an ORC through a single-pressure heat recovery
steam generator (HRSG). Their simulation results showed that the
increase in pressure ratio and isentropic efficiency of air compressor
and gas turbine efficiency improves thermodynamic performance of
the system. Also, the most exergy destruction rate takes place in the
combustion chamber, and after that in heat recovery steam generator
and gas turbine. Maeero et al. [12] analyzed and optimized the second
low processes of combined triple power plants. The combined triple
power plants includes of the Brayton cycle (gas-based) and two
Rankine cycles (steam and ammonia-based). The results of the analysis
showed that the most exergy destruction occurs in the heat exchanger.
Also, their study showed that the use of feed water heaters increases
the efficiency and with increases in ambient temperature, the exergy
efficiency decreases. Rabbani et al. [13] analyzed the combined system
that coupled a **Wind** Turbine (WT) with a combined cycle. Required
energy of cycle was provided by the wind energy which according to the
amount of cycle required energy. Their analysis showed that increasing the combustion temperature reduces the critical velocity and mass flow
rate. Increases in wind speed reduce both energy and exergy efficiency
of the overall system. Baskut et al. [14] analyzed the exergy processes of
wind turbine power plants. Exergy efficiency of the power plant found
to be between 0% and 68.20% and the values of exergy efficiencies of
the WTPP were different for different power factor value. Zhu et al.
[15] analyzed the energy and exergy processes of a bottoming Rankine
cycle for engine exhaust heat recovery. The results showed that working
fluid properties, evaporating pressure and superheating temperature
are the main factors influencing the system design and performances,
the distributions of exergy destruction are varied with working fluid
categories and system design constraints. Also, the results showed that
with the increasing of the evaporating pressure, the internal exergy
destruction of the evaporator decreases, and the external exergy
destruction increases. Most working fluids do not have the optimal
evaporating pressure due to the relatively high exhaust gas temperature.
Ozgener et al. [16] analyzed the exergy and reliability of wind turbine
systems. The results showed that exergy efficiency changes between 0%
and 48.7% at different wind speeds, considering pressure differences
between state points. The research done on the combined cycle can be
divided into four categories:

• Examining the main drivers of the combined system and the
feasibility of using different **energy** sources, especially low
temperature heat sources.

• Study of types of working fluid that can be used in combined system and cooling various technologies in combined system.

• Investigation of exergy, energy laws, and mass conservation in system.

• Optimization of combined systems.

The present study analyzes a system that couples a Wind Turbine (WT) with a Brayton/Rankine combined power cycle. The aim of the current study is to determine the performance of the combined system through examining the first and second laws of thermodynamics and utilization of wind power to provide cycle required work. The exhaust gases released from Gas Turbine are high temperatures and low pressures, these high temperatures gases drive the Rankine cycle. A working fluid in organic Rankine cycle machine plays a key role. It determines the performance and the economics of the plant [17]. Liu [18] showed that thermal efficiency for various working fluids was a minorant of the critical temperature. Hung [19] showed that wet fluids are unsuitable for ORC systems due to hydrogen bond in wet fluids. Dry and isentropic fluids do not contain liquid droplets at the turbine outlet. This is mainly due to disastrous impact of liquid droplets in turbine exhaust on the performance of turbine in the process of expansion causing the turbine blades wear off and may reduce the turbine efficiency. Rankine cycle employs an organic fluid such as refrigerant, the refrigerant used in the ORC cycle is R123. The working fluid used the Brayton cycle is air that behaves as an ideal gas in throughout the cycle.

Wind turbines convert the kinetic energy of wind in to the
mechanical power and the mechanical power transmitted in the power
generation system by the shaft. Wind turbines are mounted on tall
towers to receive the most possible energy. AWT with a diameter of 100
m is chosen for the present analysis (**Figure 1**).

The available power can be determined form the amount of air
passing through the rotor of wind turbine per unit time. Mass flow rate
of the air stream touching the rotor surface (A=ᴨR2) was estimated using
Equation. (1). Taking T_{0} = 25°C and p_{0} = 0.101 MPa as reference temperature
and pressure of environment and the density of air is ρ = 1.18 kg/m3, its
mass flow rate is

where R is the radius of the rotor and V_{r} is wind speed.

Exergy of kinetic energy is found using the Equation. (2).

(2)Available power is found using the Equation. (3).

(3)(4)

Where V_{1} is the upstream wind velocity and P_{1} is the upstream
pressure at the entrance of the rotor blades and V_{2} is the downstream
wind velocity and P_{2} is the downstream pressure at the exit of the rotor
blades.

The exit velocity can be determined by using Equation. (5).

(5)where R is the radius of the rotor and ω is measured in radian per second.

C_{p} is the fraction of upstream wind power captured by the rotor
blades. C_{p} is often called the Betz limit.

Other names for this quantity are the power coefficient of the rotor
or rotor efficiency. The power coefficient is not a static value. It varies
with tip speed ratio of the wind turbine. The real world is well below
the Betz limit with values of 0.35-0.45 common even in best designed
wind turbines [20]. Maximum value of C_{p} as 0.5926 according to
Betz criterion. The power coefficient is given by Equation. (6). In this study,
electrical equipment and mechanic equipment losses were assumed to
be ƞ_{alternator} = 0.98 and ƞ_{mechanic} = 0.97, respectively.

The useful work is found using the Equation. (7).

(7)The exergetic efficiency of a wind turbine is defined as a measure of how well the stream exergy of the fluid is converted in to useful turbine work output or inverter work output. The exergy efficiency is found by using the Equation. (8).

(8)A schematic of the proposed cogeneration cycle is shown in **Figure 2** that includes a cycle of gas turbine (GT) and a cycle of organic Rankine
cycle (ORC). WT is used to supply power to the compressor in the GT
cycle and pump fluid through a Rankine cycle. The power generation
capacity of combined cycle is 26 MW. The Brayton cycle components
consist of a combustion chamber, air compressor and GT. The Rankine
cycle components consists of a pump, steam turbine, condenser and **heat** recovery steam generator. Valves of V_{1} and V_{2} are used in the
system that controls the power penetration to the combined power
plant. In the case of the high penetration system, WT produces more
power than the required power of compressor and pump. So in this
case, the wind speed is above the critical speed and the flow valve V_{2} is
opened and V_{1} is closed up to additional power is stored in storage unit.
In the case of the low penetration system, WT produces less power than
the required power of compressor and pump. So in this case, the wind
speed is under the critical speed and the flow valve V_{1} is opened and V_{2} is closed up to additional power stored in storage unit be injected
in the cycle.

According to **Figure 2**, the ambient air at point 3 with pressure of
0.101 *MPa* and temperature of 298.15 K is compressed in air compressor.
Then the compressed air flows is entered into combustion chamber.
Fuel is injected in the combustion chamber at a pressure of 1.2 *MPa*.
Output stream of combustion chamber with a temperature of 1100°C
is expanded in the gas turbine and produces net power of 26MW. The
exhaust of the Brayton cycle at high temperature and low pressure is
used to drive a Rankine cycle. Working fluid in a saturated liquid phase
is pumped to high pressure. After being heated in the internal heat
recovery steam generator is entered the turbine to produce power and is
expanded to the condenser and is condensed to saturated liquid phase.

The assumptions made for the analysis of systems of expression are:

- The system has reached steady state.

- Pressure drop in the system's components is ignored:

(9)- Kinetic and potential energy and frictional losses are neglected.

- System components are Adiabatic.

- Condenser exit state are saturated liquid;

(10)- The ambient temperature and pressure are constant (T_{0} = 25°C and
P_{0} = 100 kPa).

- Air is treated as an ideal gas with a molar composition of 21% oxygen and 79% nitrogen.

The principle of mass conservation for the various components of the cycle can be written as follows:

(11)The calculations are carried out based on the basic assumptions,
which are listed in **Table 1**. Using the law of environmental protection,
theory of energy and **exergy** balance cycles, the balance equations of
each component for enthalpy, energy, entropy and exergy are written
as follows.

Environment temperature | 25°C |

Environment pressure | 0.1013MPa |

Steam turbine inlet pressure | 0.65MPa |

Compressor isentropic efficiency | 0.8 |

Gas turbine isentropic efficiency | 0.85 |

Steam turbine isentropic efficiency | 0.82 |

Pump isentropic efficiency | 0.75 |

Steam turbine inlet temperature | 130.15°C |

Pump inlet temperature | 30.15°C |

Compressor inlet temperature | 25.15°C |

Compressor inlet pressure | 0.1013MPa |

Compressor outlet pressure | 1 MPa |

Net power output | 26 MW |

**Table 1:** Basic assumptions for the simulation of combined cycle.

- Compressor

(12)(13)

- Combustion Chamber

(14)Where ƛ is fuel-air ratio and LHV (MJ/Kg) is lower heating value.

(15)- Gas Turbine

(16)(17)

- Heat recovery steam generator

(18)- Pump

(19)- Steam Turbine

(20)(21)

- Condenser

(22)- The net power input

(23)-The net power output

(24)- The net power input

(25)Where Betz limit φ = 0.4 and n is number of wind turbine and W_{u} is the output useful work of wind turbine and motor efficiency.

Thermal efficiency of the combined system is defined as the ratio of useful output (specific work output from the cycle and the heat extracted in the condenser) to the input energy (specific work input to the cycle and heat entered to the cycle in the combustion chamber). Performance of the system is shown based on the first law of thermodynamics.

(26)where HHV is higher heating value.

Exergy analysis determines the system performance based on
exergy, which is defined as the maximum possible reversible work
obtainable in bringing the state of the system to equilibrium with that
of the environment, and the evaluation is based on the second law of
thermodynamics, because the second law considers not only quantity
but also the quality of energy. Taking T_{0} and p_{0} as reference **temperature** and pressure of environment, thermal losses in each of the system
components were assumed negligible. Exergy at each point of the cycle
is calculated as follows by considering the following assumptions:

(28)

By forgoing the kinetic and potential exergies, the total exergy of
fuel (The mixture of N_{2}, H_{2}O, CO_{2}, O_{2} gases) can be expressed as [21]:

Where e^{CH} is chemical exergy per mole of gas k, x_{K} is the mole
fraction of gas k in the environmental gas phase and R is universal gas
constant. Exergy efficiency is defined as the output exergy (net exergy
work output from the cycle) to the input exergy (net exergy work input
to the cycle and exergy entered in the fuel injection):

Exergy destruction in each component of the combined cycle is calculated as follows,

(31)The total exergy destruction is equal to the summation of the exergy destruction by each of its components.

Parametric analysis is carried out to evaluate the effects of
various design parameters such as wind speed, angular speed of WT ,
compressor pressure ratio, compressor isentropic efficiency, gas turbine
inlet temperature, gas turbine isentropic efficiency and condenser
temperature on the performance of cycle. When one specific parameter
is studied, other parameters are kept constant. **Table 2** shows the **thermodynamic** properties such as enthalpy and entropy as well as the
mass flow rate and exergy rate at each point of the combined cycle at
typical working conditions. The mass flow rate and exergy rate in the
wind turbine is variable and depends on the wind speed changes. **Table
3** shows the performance of the Brayton/Rankine combined cycle at
typical working conditions. Thermal efficiency and exergy efficiency
have been obtained respectively 21.3% and 23.5% with existence of wind
turbines as the supplier of power of combined system whereas thermal
efficiency and exergy efficiency have been obtained respectively 36%
and 48% without the wind turbines. **Table 4** shows exergy destruction in
each component of the combined cycle. The largest exergy destruction
occurs in the Combustion Chamber.

State | T (°C) | P (kPa) | h (kj/kg) | s (kg/kg.k) | m (kg/s) | E (KW) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

1 | 25 | 101.3 | 298.4 | 5.7 | - | - |

2 | 25 | 157.7 | 298.4 | 5.7 | - | - |

3 | 25 | 101.3 | 298.4 | 5.7 | 115.3 | 0 |

4 | 371 | 1000 | 647.5 | 7.377 | 115.3 | 22399 |

5 | 1100 | 1000 | 1378 | 8.065 | 117.3 | 84493 |

6 | 537 | 101.3 | 813.7 | 8.229 | 117.3 | 12554 |

7 | 130 | 650 | 471.6 | 1.773 | 18.34 | 30971 |

8 | 30 | 260 | 456.8 | 1.831 | 18.34 | 30402 |

9 | 30 | 109.7 | 231.4 | 1.109 | 18.34 | 30221 |

10 | 30.31 | 650 | 231.9 | 1.109 | 18.34 | 30228 |

11 | 514 | 101.3 | 779.4 | 7.909 | 117.3 | 12047 |

12 | 298.15 | 1200 | 298.4 | 5.7 | 2 | 85000 |

**Table 2:** Results of simulation for the combined cycle.

Pump work (KW) | 9.105 |

Gas turbine work (KW) | 65869 |

Net work (KW) | 26000 |

Steam turbine work (KW) | 273.1 |

Compressor work (KW) | 40133 |

Thermal efficiency (%) | 21.31 |

Exergy efficiency (%) | 23.54 |

**Table 3:** Performance of the combined cycle.

Compressor(KW) | 5082 |

Gas turbine(KW) | 5684 |

Steam turbine(KW) | 295.4 |

Condenser(KW) | 108.8 |

Combustion chamber (KW) | 22905 |

Pump (KW) | 2.219 |

HRSG (KW) | 21933 |

**Table 4:** Exergy destruction in each component of the combined cycle.

**Figure 3** shows the effect of wind speed on the WT exergy efficiency
and the useful work of WT. According to Equation. (8), exergy efficiency of
WT is equal to the ratio of power at inverter output to useful power
from WT. With an increase in the wind speed, useful power from WT
increases and exergy efficiency of WT decreases. **Figure 4** shows the
effect of wind speed on the total exergy and thermal efficiencies. With
an increase in the wind speed, the mass flow rate of the wind turbine
increases. Thus the output wok of the WT and input work to the
combined cycle increase. According to Equations. (26), (30), with the increase
of input work to the combined cycle, the total exergy and thermal
efficiencies reduce. **Figure 5** shows the effect of the angular speed of
WT on the total exergy and thermal efficiencies. With an increase in the
angular speed of WT, both efficiencies increase.

**Figure 6** shows the effect of the compressor pressure ratio on the
total exergy and thermal efficiencies and compressor work. With the increase in compressor pressure ratio, the enthalpy of the outlet of the
compressor increases and the air flow rate decreases and the flow of fuel
consumption also increases. Net power of gas turbine cycle is constant.
Thus, work of air compressor increases and by increasing the fuel
consumption, input exergy to the combined cycle increase. Reduction
of the air flow rate makes decreasing in the heat transferred to ORC.
Thus, flow rate of working fluid and work of ORC reduce. By impact
of the above factors, the total exergy and thermal efficiencies decrease. **Figure 7** shows the effect of the isentropic air compressor efficiency
on the total thermal and exergy efficiencies and compressor work. By
increasing the isentropic air compressor efficiency, the enthalpy of the
outlet of the compressor decreases and the enthalpy of the input remains
constant. Since the net power of gas turbine cycle is constant. Thus,
the air flow rate increases and the flow of fuel consumption decreases
and input exergy to the combined cycle also decreases. These changes makes the flow rate increasing of working fluid and Rankine cycle work
increasing and increasing in the heat transferred to ORC. According to
these parameters, the total exergy and thermal efficiencies increase with
increasing in the isentropic air compressor efficiency.

**Figure 8** shows the effect of the condenser temperature on the
total exergy and thermal efficiencies and heat transfer in condenser by
increasing condenser temperature, exergy efficiency does not change
much but thermal efficiency reduces. With increasing condenser
temperature, outlet enthalpy of the condenser increases and input
enthalpy of the condenser and flow rate of working fluid of ORC cycle
remain constant. Therefore, heat transfer in condenser reduce. According
to Eq. (26), thermal efficiency reduce by raising the temperature of the
condenser. **Figure 9** shows the effect of GT isentropic efficiency on the
total exergy and thermal efficiencies. Increasing the isentropic efficiency
of gas turbine leads to increase both thermal and exergy efficiencies
of the combined cycle. By increasing isentropic efficiency of the gas
turbine, the enthalpy of the outlet of the gas turbine decreases and since
net power of gas turbine cycle is constant, the air flow rate increases
and fuel flow rate reduces and input exergy to the system decreases.
The energy balance at the HRSG makes flow rate increasing of working
fluid and increasing in the network of ORC. With these changes, the
total exergy and thermal efficiencies increase. **Figure 10** shows the effect
of GT inlet temperature on the total exergy and thermal efficiencies
and gas turbine work. Inlet temperature of gas turbine has a significant
impact on the total exergy and thermal efficiencies. By increasing inlet temperature of the gas turbine, the enthalpy of the inlet and outlet
points of gas turbine and the air flow rate increase and input fuel to the
cycle reduces. Thus, work of gas turbine increases and input exergy to
the cycle decreases. With these changes, the total exergy and thermal
efficiencies increase.

In this paper, a comprehensive study on a system that couples a Wind Turbine (WT) with a combined heat and power cycle from thermodynamic point of view was investigated with considering two objective functions of first and second law efficiency of the system. The proposed heat and power combined system in this study includes Wind Turbines to supply the power of combined cycle, a gas turbine cycle of 26 MW power and an ORC to produce more power. Adding ORC to the system can produce about 273.1 kW additional power from waste heat recovery of exhaust gases of the GT cycle for the considered base operating conditions. The wind power is used to drive the pump and compressor and if required, additional power is stored by the storage unit that enters to the system in the low wind speed.

The parametric analysis results of the base case show that the increase in isentropic efficiencies of air compressor and gas turbine and gas turbine inlet temperature improves thermodynamic performance of the system.

An increasing wind speed and the compressor pressure ratio reduce both energy and exergy efficiencies of the overall system.

Exergy analysis showed that the highest exergy destruction occurs in the combustion chamber and exergy destruction is significant in the compressor and gas turbine and the pump of the organic Rankine cycle has the least exergy destruction.

- Wrixon GT, Rooney ME, Palz W (2000) Renewable energy 2000. Springer-Verlag.
- Gu W, Weng Y, Wang Y, Zheng B (2009) Theoretical and experimental investigation of an organic Rankine cycle for a waste heat recovery system. J Power Energy 223:523-533.
- Wei D, Lu X, Lu Z, Gu J (2007) Performance analysis and optimization of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for waste heat recovery. Energy Convers Manage 48: 1113-1119.
- Chen H, Goswami DY, Stefanakos EK (2010) A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat. Renew Sustain Energy Rev14: 3059-3067.
- Roy P, Désilets M, Galanis N, Nesreddine H, Cayer E(2010) Thermodynamic analysis of a power cycle using a low-temperature source and a binary NH3-H2O mixture as working fluid. Int J ThermSci49: 48-58.
- Yamada N, Minami T, Mohamad MNA (2011) Fundamental experiment of pump less Rankine-type cycle for low-temperature heat recovery. Energy 36: 1010-1017.
- Baik YJ, Kim M, Chang KC, Kim SJ (2011) Power-based performance comparison between carbon dioxide and R125 transcritical cycles for a low-grade heat source. Appl Energy 88: 892-898.
- Rashidi MM, Bég OA, Parsa AB, Nazari F (2011) Analysis and optimization of a trans critical power cycle with regenerator using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms. J Power Energy 225: 701-717.
- Khaliq A, KaushikSC (2004) Second-law based thermodynamic analysis of Brayton/Rankine combined power cycle with reheat. Applied Energy 78: 179-197.
- Wang J, Dai Y, Zhang T, Ma S(2009) Parametric analysis for a new combined power and ejector–absorption refrigeration cycle. Energy 34: 1587-1593
- Khaljani M, Saray RK, BahlouliK (2015) Comprehensive analysis of energy, exergy and exergo-economic of cogeneration of heat and power in a combined gas turbine and organic Rankine cycle. Energy ConversManag97: 154-165.
- Marrero IO,Lefsaker AM, Razani A, Kim KJ (2002) Second law analysis and optimization of a combined triple power cycle. Energy Convers Manag 43: 557-573.
- Rabbani M, Dincer I, Naterer GF (2012) Thermodynamic assessment of a wind turbine based combined cycle. Energy 44: 321-328.
- BaskutO, OzgenerO, OzgenerL(2011) Second law analysis of wind turbine power plants: Cesme, Izmir example. Energy 36: 2535-2542.
- Zhu S, Deng K, QuS (2013) Energy and exergy analyses of a bottoming Rankine cycle for engine exhaust heat recovery.Energy 58: 448-457.
- Ozgener O, Ozgener L(2007) Exergy and reliability analysis of wind turbine systems: A case study. RenewSustainEnergy Rev 11: 1811-1826.
- Bertrand T, Sylvain Q, Sébastien D, George P, Vincent L (2010) Economic Optimization of Small Scale Organic Rankine Cycles.
- Liu BT, Chien KH, Wang CC (2004) Effect of working fluids on organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery. Energy 29: 1207-1217.
- Hung T (2001) Waste heat recovery of organic Rankine cycle using dry fluids. Energy Convers Manage42: 539-553.
- Manyonge AW, Ochieng RM, Onyango FN,Shichikha JM (2012) Mathematical Modelling of Wind Turbine in a Wind Energy Conversion System: Power Coefficient Analysis. Appl Mathematical Sciences 91: 4527-4536.
- Bejan A, Tsatsaronis G, Moran M (1996) Thermal design and optimization. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

- Adsorption Process
- Advanced Photovoiltoic Cells
- Advanced Photovoiltoic Panels
- Advanced Photovoiltoic Systems
- Advanced Photovoiltoic Technologies
- Alternative Energy
- Biomass Energy
- Biomass and Biological Waste Treatment
- CO2 Mitigation
- Chemical Waste Management
- Clean Energy
- Coal Energy
- Composting
- E-waste
- Energy Management
- Environmental Policy
- Fly Ash
- Fossil Fuel
- Geothermal Energy
- Green Energy
- Greenhouse
- Harvesting
- Harvesting Field Greens
- Heavy Metals
- Humic Substance
- Hydro Electric Energy
- Hydro Energy
- Hydrogen Energy
- Hydrogen and Biodiesel
- Hydropower Energy
- Immobilization
- Incineration Research
- Industrial Waste
- Modern Biomass Biofuel
- Nuclear waste
- Organic Matter
- Petrolium and Petrochemistry
- Photovoltoics
- Recyclable Waste
- Renewable Energy
- Renewable Energy and Research
- Renewable Geothermal Energy
- Resource Efficiency
- Science and Technology in Waste Treatment
- Solar Energy (Thermal and Electrical)
- Solar Radiation
- Solid Waste Management
- Special Waste
- Waste Hierarchy
- Waste Management
- Waste Resources Management
- Waste Water
- Wind Energy
- Zero Waste

- 2nd International Conference on Renewable Energy and Resources

August 27-28, 2018 (10 Plenary Forums - 1Event) Boston, USA

- Total views:
**12470** - [From(publication date):

March-2016 - Jul 19, 2018] - Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views :
**11959** - PDF downloads :
**511**

Peer Reviewed Journals

International Conferences 2018-19