alexa Urinary Biomarkers for Kidney Disease in ATTR Amyloidosis | OMICS International
ISSN: 2161-0959
Journal of Nephrology & Therapeutics

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Urinary Biomarkers for Kidney Disease in ATTR Amyloidosis

Rocha A1*, Bravo F2, Beiro I1,3,4, Vizcano J4,5, Oliveira JC2 and Lobato L1,3,4

1Department of Nephrology, St. Anthony Hospital, Central Hospital of Porto, Porto, Portugal

2Department of Clinical Chemistry, St. Anthony Hospital, Central Hospital of Porto, Porto, Portugal

3Unit Clinic Paramiloidose, St. Anthony Hospital, Central Hospital of Porto, Porto, Portugal

4UMIB, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar - ICBAS, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

5Department of Pathology, St. Anthony Hospital, Central Hospital of Porto, Porto, Portugal

*Corresponding Author:
Ana Rocha
Department of Nephrology
St. Anthony Hospital
Central Hospital of Porto
Porto, Portugal
Tel: +351222077500
Fax: +351222053218
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: June 25, 2014; Accepted Date: September 10, 2014; Published Date: September 18, 2014

Citation: Rocha A, Bravo F, Beirão I, Vizcaíno J, Oliveira JC, et al. (2014) Urinary Biomarkers for Kidney Disease in ATTR Amyloidosis. J Nephrol Ther 4:181. doi:10.4172/2161-0959.1000181

Copyright: © 2014 Rocha A, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Nephrology & Therapeutics


Aim: The detection and prognosis of nephropathy in transthyretin amyloidosis depends on albuminuria and renal function. Knowing that urinary levels of alpha-1 microglobulin and beta-2 microglobulin reflect tubular dysfunction while urinary alpha-2 macroglobulin implies glomerular damage, we decide investigate the diagnostic value of these markers in the patients with transthyretin amyloidosis. Methods: Serum and urinary samples collected from 30 patients and 11 asymptomatic carriers were tested for alpha-1 microglobulin, beta-2 microglobulin, alpha-2 macroglobulin, albumin, creatinine and cystatin C. Results: Pathological urinary alpha-1 microglobulin was detected in 17 patients, beta-2 microglobulin in 6 and alpha-2 macroglobulin in 5; 5 patients had albuminuria (mg/g creatinine) 30-300 and in 20 patients values >300 were present. Asymptomatic carriers did not present pathological excretion of these biomarkers and albuminuria was >30 in 1 individual. The excretion rates of alpha-1 microglobulin and beta-2 microglobulin were positively correlated with albuminuria (P<0.001), serum creatinine (P<0.05) and cystatin C (P<0.001). Urinary alpha-2 macroglobulin was almost exclusively found in the presence of albuminuria, although their levels do not correlate. Conclusion: Urinary biomarkers emerge as a potential approach to detect renal disease but unexpectedly, urinary alpha-2 macroglobulin was not a marker of the severity of albuminuria


Transthyretin; Amyloid; Low molecular weight proteins; Kidney; Proximal tubules


The Amyloidoses Associated with Transthyretin (ATTR) are autosomal-dominant diseases related to at least 100 different Transthyretin (TTR) mutations. The single amino-acid substitution of methionine for valine at position 30 is the most common [1]. Although this disorder was initially thought to follow a benign evolution concerning the kidney, it was later recognized that progression to End- Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) occurs in up to 10 percent of patients as natural course of the disease [2].

The detection and prognosis of ATTR nephropathy depend on the presence of albuminuria and an elevated serum creatinine concentration. These are correlated with the amount of amyloid in the glomeruli, arterioles, and medium vessels. When amyloid is confined to the tubulointerstitium or vasculature, proteinuria is minimal and reduced Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) is the principal clinical manifestation. In some patients, proximal tubular epithelial cells contained reabsorption-like droplets TTR positive and Congo-red stain negative, but clinical expression of tubular dysfunction has not been described until now [2].

Conventional measurements of renal function, such as creatinine and BUN levels, are limited by several non-renal factors, including body weight and nutritional status, which are particularly relevant in this population. Of special note, increased concentrations of albuminuria among patients with a GFR >60 ml/min (an area of weakness for serum creatinine and GFR), may define a higher risk patients to develop clinical nephropathy.

Specific urinary biomarkers for tubular and interstitial pathologic abnormalities are needed for early detection and timely treatment. Ideally, there should be early markers of nephropathy in initial stages of ATTR, even before neurological manifestations

Although Orthotopic Liver Transplantation (OLT) is performed as a potential curative treatment, new strategies have been developed to treat Familial Amyloidotic Polyneuropathy (FAP) [3]. Tafamidis was approved for the treatment of ATTR in adult patients with stage 1 symptomatic polyneuropathy to delay peripheral neurologic impairment [4]. Several trials, some already completed and others recruiting participants, are evaluating new drugs [5]. Until now, trials did not clarify whether kidney disease is a criterion for excluding or adopting the use of a given drug. Most trials accept patients with evidence of neuropathy, some with cardiomyopathy but none of them have admitted patients with nephropathy as an isolated feature. It is questionable whether a patient with proteinuria, renal amyloid deposition identified as TTR and without other manifestations of disease would be a candidate for any future therapy.

In the past decades, several urinary proteins have been identified as early prognostic markers in different kidney diseases [6]. Beta-2- Microglobulin (B2M) and Alpha-1-Microglobulin (A1M) are both low molecular weight proteins that are freely filtered by glomerulus, efficiently reabsorbed and catabolized by proximal tubule. No active tubular secretion or significant extra renal elimination occurs. Therefore, in the presence of renal dysfunction, B2M and A1M serum levels are increased when compared to those patients with normal renal function [7]. Alpha-2 Macroglobulin (A2M) is a tetrameric glycoprotein, produced in human plasma that has a molecular mass of 725 kDa [8]. Urinary levels of A2M increase when glomerular leakage occurs and, consequently, can act as a marker of such impairment. The aim of this study was to evaluate urinary A1M, B2M and A2M as early markers of ATTR nephropathy and predictors of outcome of renal disease.

Patients and Methods

We evaluated a cohort of thirty patients and eleven asymptomatic gene carriers with the TTR V30M mutation. Information about demographics and clinical characteristics was collected. Age-at-onset of FAP was defined as the age of initial neurologic features

Amyloid deposition was confirmed histologically in 24 patients; sections from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded biopsy specimens were stained with Congo red and viewed under cross-polarized light

Patients who attended our clinic were followed by the same nephrological team. Diabetic patients and patients submitted to OLT, therapy with tafamidis or under any therapeutic clinical trial were excluded.

Markers Measurements

On the day of the urine sample collection, blood samples were taken.

Serum and urinary creatinine levels (mg/dL) were measured by a rate-blanked compensated Jaffé method on a Modular P analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Urinary albumin levels (mg) were measured with an automated immunoturbidimetric assay using the Cobas Integra 800 analyser (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The amount of albuminuria was estimated by the albumin to creatinine ratio (mg/g). Albuminuria <30 mg/g was considered normal.

Urinary B2M (ng/mL) was measured by a chemiluminescent immunometric assay using IMMULITE 2000 (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany), whereas urinary A1M levels (mg/L) and urinary A2M (mg/L) were measured with nephelometry on a Siemens BNII nephelometer (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany).

Urinary values of A1M >12 mg/L, A2M >9.4 mg/L and B2M >300 ng/mL were considered abnormal. These biomarkers were corrected for urinary creatinine

The GFR was estimated by serum cystatin C (CysC) expressed in mg/dL. It was determined on a nephelometric analyzer (Behring Nephelometer 2; Paris La Défense Cedex, Paris, France) by means of particle-enhanced immunonephelometry (N latex CysC; Dade Behring, Marburg, Germany) after calibration and control. Cystatinestimated GFR was calculated according to Larsson formula: GFR = 77.239 x CysC-1.2623 [9].

The inflammatory state was evaluated by determination of C-reactive protein (CRP) (reference value <5 mg/L) and ferritin values (reference range 12.5-454 ng/mL). Pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (pro- BNP) concentration was measured in all subjects (reference value < 227 pg/mL).

Statistical Analysis

Correlations were assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient test. The level of significance was considered to be P<0.05. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation


Patients were 49.4 ± 12.6 years-old, 18 females and 12 males, who presented a neuropathy evolution of 5.0 ± 4.4 years. Asymptomatic gene carriers were 41.4 ± 15 years-old, 9 females and 2 males.

Twenty four patients were biopsied and deposition of amyloid was demonstrated in 21: 15 (71.4%) on salivary gland biopsy, 4 (19%) on renal biopsy (Figure 1), 1 (4.8%) on myocardial tissue biopsy and 1 (4.8%) from peripheral nerve tissue biopsy.


Figure 1: Anti-TTR fixation showed droplets accumulation in the renal proximal tubular cells, ATTR V30M-amyloidosis, immunoperoxidase technique, original magnification x400.

The laboratory data is summarized in Tables 1, 2 and 3. Eleven patients showed overt renal failure, with 5 of them progressing to dialysis. None of the patients showed glycosuria.

  Patients (n = 30) Asymptomatic gene carriers (n = 11)
uAlb (mg/g) 1663.9 ± 2019.9 11.5 ± 14.1
Cr (mg/dL) 1.71 ± 2.17 0.72  ± 0.14
CysC (mg/dL) 1.54 ± 1.15 0.66  ±  0.12
GFR (mL/min) 76.9 ± 52.6 137.4  ±  32.5
CRP (mg/L) 4.8 ± 10.4 3.8 ± 5.3
Ferritin (ng/mL) 190 ± 184 171 ± 228
pro-BNP (pg/mL) 1064 ± 2165 59 ± 48

Table 1: Study population laboratory parameters.

Gender Age uAlb Cr CysC GFR B2M A1M A2M CRP Ferritin pro-BNP
M 63 21,1 0,96 0,87 91 28,7 8,5 <2,53 1,42 278 34,2
F 37 3,2 0,53 0,48 201 104 <5,16 <2,41 0,83 50 26,7
M 63 3,5 0,89 0,85 93 18,9 <5,96 <2,41 2,91 821 36,7
F 28 4,6 0,82 0,62 141 16,1 <5,16 <2,41 3,37 60 25,7
F 30 16,7 0,5 0,54 171 74,1 <5,96 <2,41 1,23 127 58,7
F 33 2 0,72 0,65 134 121 <5,96 <2,41 18,39 90 42,6
F 30 11 0,74 0,61 144 20,9 <5,16 <2,41 2,18 166 41
F 27 0,9 0,78 0,64 136 91,3 <5,96 <2,41 1,58 49 71,3
F 33 7,1 0,66 0,57 160 72 12 3,34 8,34 152 198,1
F 63 7,4 0,7 0,73 114 43,7 8,86 <2,41 0,76 37 56,9
F 48 49,5 0,65 0,67 127 98,9 9,21 <2,47 0,75 47 55,6

Table 2: Laboratory assessment in asymptomatic gene carriers.

Gender Age uAlb Cr CysC GFR B2M A1M A2M CRP Ferritin pro-BNP
M 64 5,9 1,27 1,25 56 4,29 <5,69 <2,47 3,39 158 256,6
F 62 78,9 0,69 1,07 68 5,22 6,6 <2,47 2,8 453 1643
M 59 1877,8 1,12 0,842 94 5,69 24,3 2,6 1,43 95 155,9
F 52 1762,5 1,46 1,51 43 12,9 32,5 14,7 0,83 128 169,3
M 38 680,5 1,52 1,71 37 15,16 34,4 <2,53 7,96 326 134
F 55 4222,2 0,91 1,15 62 18,4 26,6 5,29 1,07 70 323,7
F 32 1192,7 0,47 0,497 190 25,7 6,46 <2,41 0,37 45 81,4
F 44 671 0,65 0,843 94 25,7 25,7 3,6 0,39 143 131,8
F 41 4187,1 0,54 0,96 79 28,2 9,16 <2,47 0,14 13 91,6
F 43 1298,4 0,63 1,07 68 31,2 41,2 <2,41 53,46 38 594,9
M 43 152,8 0,87 1,29 53 43,2 6,99 <2,41 26,35 91  
F 71 5103,3 4,56 3,76 13 46,13 123 17 1,87 490 2657
F 34 8,4 0,76 0,75 110 55,3 6,29 <2,47 4 57 196
F 69 676 0,78 1,33 51 59,7 8,22 <2,47 4,05 322 239,9
M 50 67,9 0,76 0,63 138 59,9 10,2 <2,47 2,6 553 16,6
F 39 696,2 0,35 0,47 204 63 15,5 <2,47 1,97 19 171
M 32 3,7 0,87 0,69 122 74,3 6,61 <2,41 0,51 18 16,3
M 56 83,2 0,81 0,66 130 84,7 <5,96 <2,47 3,45 110 81,7
F 48 642,5 0,52 0,85 93 105 14,2 <2,41 0,84 18 144,7
M 40 577 2,94 2,91 18 117 47,6 2,5 0,19 45 1076
F 39 6,2 0,63 0,64 135 119 <5,16 <2,41 0,27 122 134,5
F 46 2,9 0,59 0,67 128 127 13,7 6,3 0,59 91 40,2
M 36 790 0,58 0,79 103 173 16,5 4,35 2,2 288 174,8
F 52 2381,7 1,43 2,86 18 297 9,34 <2,47 10,32 244 4205
M 28 6,8 0,73 0,76 107 327 7,36 <2,47 0,76 271 20,6
M 64 1989 1,56 1,78 35 784 25,3 10 2,32 482 646,7
M 49 3193,3 1,98 2,95 18 6592 37,3 4,93 4,03 68 1712
F 60 4728,7 6,17 3,19 16 26122 158 11,3 2,89 47 904,4
F 69 7526,9 4,82 3,79 13 30627 98,5 4,85 1,89 204 4216
F 68 5303,8 10,45 4,65 10 71105 34,8 89,8 0,68 691 10616

Table 3: Laboratory assessment in patients.

B2M was detected in all asymptomatic gene carriers with a mean value of 62.7 ng/mL (range 16.1 to 121 ng/mL). Also, A1M was present in 4 subjects with a mean value of 9.7 mg/L (range 8.5-12 mg/L) and A2M was only detected in one individual with a value of 3.34 mg/L. All values were on the reference range.

Pathological urinary A1M, B2M and A2M levels were detected in 17, 6 and 5 patients respectively. However, none of the asymptomatic gene carriers showed such abnormal excretion

A1M concentration was 45.2 ± 41.3 mg/L in all 30 patients. Medium B2M and A2M concentration were 22592.8 ± 27047.6 ng/mL and 28.6 ± 34.3 mg/L, respectively. The values corrected for urinary creatinine were 86 ± 110 mg/L, 54759 ± 63665 ng/mL and 56 ± 75 mg/L for each marker respectively

Six patients had albuminuria <30 mg/g, 4 between 30 and 300 mg/g and 20 >300 mg/g. Among normoalbuminuric patients we found one with urinary pathological levels of A2M and A1M and another with abnormal B2M levels. Among 14 patients who evolved to ESRD, 5 presented simultaneous detection of A1M and A2M.

A1M and B2M, were positively correlated with albuminuria, serum creatinine and cystatin C (Table 4) in all patients. A2M was almost exclusively found in the presence of albuminuria >30 mg/g, although their levels do not correlate with the severity of albuminuria

  A1M A1M/cr B2M B2M/cr
Variables R P Value R P Value R P Value R P Value
uAlb 0.68 <0.01 0.79 <0.001 0.71 <0.01 0.66 <0.01
Cr 0.57 <0.05 0.71 <0.01 0.74 <0.001 0.69 <0.01
CysC 0.70 <0.001 0.76 <0.001 0.65 <0.01 0.58 <0.01

Table 4: Correlations between alpha 1-microglobulin (A1M) and beta-2 microglobulin (B2M).

There were no significant correlations between urinary levels of A1M, B2M and A2M and pro-BNP, CRP and ferritin levels.


In current clinical practice, definitive diagnosis of ATTR nephropathy is based on renal biopsy findings. In our experience, however, the diagnosis can be reliably made in patients with albuminuria in the unequivocal presence of neuropathy. Conversely, we face two constraints. The first is that albuminuria is not a marker of tubulointerstitial damage. The second refers to the fact that this marker is absent in 10 percent of the patients who progress to ESRD [10].

Thus, improved methods for detect onset of kidney amyloid deposits, even before clinical disease, are needed to allow earlier treatment. This study is the first description of the contribution of urinary proteins, other than albumin, as non-invasive and costeffective markers to anticipate renal TTR amyloidosis

A low content of protein in the urine, readily determinable, offers advantage over current biofluids widely used such as serum and plasma. The urine proteome represents the integrated product of glomerular filtration of plasma and protein shedding by cells of the proximal renal tubule, suggestive of both systemic and local contributions [11].

In our study, concentrations of all 3 urinary biomarkers increased progressively with decreasing GFR. One third of our patients presented a clear glomerular proteinuria, although significant tubular component was also observed. Urinary excretion of low-molecular proteins A1M and B2M, which are reliable indicators of tubular impairment, was present in 60 percent of patients. The occurrence of low molecular weight proteinuria, despite the absence of typical tubular syndrome, can be explained by the fact that megalin, a multiligand receptor expressed on the renal proximal tubules, functions as a specialized chaperone protein for internalization and degradation of a number of proteins, including A1M e B2M [12]. We speculate that the mechanism for low molecular weight proteinuria is not tubular damage but rather a saturation of the megalin-mediated endocytosis. So, the protein overload present in the lumen of the proximal tubule results in a combined low and high molecular weight proteinuria. We presume that urinary excretion of tubular proteins is related with severity of kidney injury and it is not a precocious marker.

The progressive dysfunction of the glomerular barrier leads to nonselective waste of high molecular weight proteins. Excretion of A2M is considered to be related with the severity of albuminuria. Unexpectedly, this correlation was not found.

Tencer et al. reported the proteinuria selectivity index as useful to describe changes of the glomerular permeability for macromolecules in glomerular diseases [13]. Proteins the size of A2M cannot normally pass the glomerular barrier. Based on a comparison of the clearance of high-molecular-weight proteins to that of albumin, the pattern of glomerular proteinuria may be described as either selective or nonselective. Early in the course of diabetic glomerular disease, selective proteinuria in both micro- and macroalbuminuric stages is observed. As the disease progresses, proteinuria becomes more nonselective and those with selective proteinuria tend to have a better outcome.

We consider that probably the low number of patients with pathological elimination of A2M did not allow a significant correlation

However, the combined excretion of low and high molecular weight proteins was exclusively found in patients who progressed to ESRD.

Therefore, periodic screening of subclinical tubulopathy using these urinary biomarkers appears to be a simple and non-invasive means of identifying ATTR patients at risk of kidney disease, including impeding decline in kidney function

Vyssouli et al. in a study involving 1445 nondiabetic patients revealed that urinary A1M is independently associated with circulating acute phase proteins in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension. They concluded that urinary A1M may reflect the overall inflammatory status in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension, beyond its value as a marker of renal function [14]. In order to exclude the variation associated with inflammatory markers we evaluated CRP and ferritin. None of the individuals presented abnormal values. We did not find a correlation between A1M and these inflammatory proteins

Cardiomyopathy is another well-known complication in FAP Considering that pro-BNP appears to be a sensitive marker for heart complications and proved valuable for follow-up purposes [15], we decided to search for a correlation between cardiac and kidney biomarkers. Nonetheless, no significant relation was found for this sample

It must be highlighted that our study design has some limitations, such as the small size of the sample and the lack of a gold standard method to evaluate GFR. Additionally, we only had single measurements of B2M, A1M, A2M, CysC, and creatinine, and these measurements are known to vary within participants.

Actually, an encouraging source of molecular markers for renal dysfunction and structural injury is urinary exosomes, nanovesicles released by renal epithelial cells including glomerular podocytes, renal tubule cells and the cells lining the ureter and bladder [16]. When combined with mass spectrometry and other proteomics techniques, urinary exosomes provide an opportunity to study proteins that were once either difficult or impossible to reach. For amyloidosis a first approach was designed in light chain amyloidosis [17].

However, it should be noted the fact that several proteins were evaluated together in the same population

It is likely that a combination of biomarkers will be required for assessing disease detection and future response to a treatment. In conclusion, the use of urinary low and high molecular weight proteins, like A1M, B2M and A2M, represented useful markers to estimate injury severity and monitoring the progression of renal lesion in ATTR V30M. The design of clinical urinary proteomics studies may increase our understanding of renal involvement in ATTR in the near future

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

  • World Nephrologists Meeting
    July 23-24, 2018 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 22nd European Nephrology Conference
    October 15-16, 2018 Warsaw, Poland
  • 18th International Conference on Nephrology & Therapeutics
    October 22-23, 2018 Osaka, Japan

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11904
  • [From(publication date):
    November-2014 - Jul 20, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8131
  • PDF downloads : 3773

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7