Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

^{1}Department of Geology, Kwara State University, Malete, Nigeria

^{2}Department of Geology, University of Ibadan, Nigeria

- Corresponding Author:
- Owoyemi OO

Department of Geology

Kwara State University, Malete, Nigeria

**Tel:**+234 811 567 8149

**E-mail:**[email protected]

**Received Date:** March 23, 2017; **Accepted Date:** April 25, 2017; **Published Date:** May 02, 2017

**Citation: **Owoyemi OO, Adeyemi GO (2017) Variability in the Highway Geotechnical Properties of Two Residual Lateritic Soils from Central Nigeria. J Geol Geophys 6:290. doi: 10.4172/2381-8719.1000290

**Copyright:** © 2017 Owoyemi OO, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

**Visit for more related articles at** Journal of Geology & Geophysics

Sixty-four bulk samples of two residual lateritic soils forming the subgrade of the failed sections flexible highway pavement linking Ilorin to Mokwa in central Nigeria were investigated. This was with a view to determining the level of variation in the geotechnical properties of soil samples taken systematically within restricted area in two locations underlain by different bed rocks. One set was developed over sandstone formation of the Southern Bida Basin while the other set was developed over migmatite-gneiss. Consistency limits, grain size distribution, specific gravity, compaction, California Bearing Ratio (CBR), permeability and compressibility characteristics of these soils were determined using the British standard procedures 1377. Coefficient of variation was used to measure the degree of variation in the determined properties. The coefficients of variations for the sandstone derived soil (1.68% and 56.86%) are higher than that of the migmatite-gneiss derived soil (1.28%-54.40%). Permeability, linear shrinkage, and coefficient of volume compressibility possess the highest variability. Atterberg limits and derived indices, amount of fines, soaked and unsoaked CBR possess moderate variability, while moisture density parameters (MDD and OMC), natural moisture content and specific gravity exhibits the least variability. In order to prevent design errors, field sampling should be very thorough involving collection of several samples. This approach will eliminate wrong inferences often associated with results of testing of few samples

Highway geotechnics; Coefficient of variation; Sampling; Subgrade; Parent rock

The Ilorin-Mokwa road is an economically important highway
linking the Nigerian Southwest with the Northwest. This highway is the
major transport route for agricultural goods, services and petroleum
products between these regions. It is characterized by all manner
of structural failures ranging from waviness to large potholes and
completely failed sections. A number of reasons ranging from faulty
designs, lack of drainage, thin wearing course coverings, negligible
quality control, inadequate maintenance funding, geological and
pedogenic factors to geotechnical factors have been adduced to the
general poor conditions of Nigerian roads [1-3]. Although, there are
many probable reasons for the failure of this important highway, certain
observations were made while carrying out preliminary studies on it. **Figure 1** shows that the thickness of the highway flexible pavement
and its foundation are not good enough and do not meet up with
recommended specification for upper layers of highly trafficked flexible
highway pavements. It was also noticed that the highway lacks adequate
crown and possesses little slope that give room for efficient drainage
of rainwater away from the pavement surface. Water penetrates the
pavement from the surface and infiltrates from the sides of the road
because of holes in the pavement and the fact that most sections do
not have shoulders bordered by ditches as shown by **Figure 2**. The road
therefore sometimes serves as drainage path for rainwater because the
pavement is not well elevated. Incidentally, this federal highway has the
highest average daily traffic and percentage of heavy vehicles in Nigeria
[3]. This road therefore, requires more skillful design and careful
considerations of all possible factors that might affect its service life.

Researchers have reported the variability in geotechnical properties of Nigerian soils [4-7]. However the study area has not been covered in such research. Fundamentally there are many sources of variabilities and uncertainties associated with site characterization. This includes measurement errors and statistical uncertainty. While the actual variability involves only the variability of soil properties, the total variability includes other additional sources of uncertainties such as measurement errors and statistical uncertainties [8]. This research however assumes that the other sources of variabilities aside the actual variability have been cancelled out by comparing two genetically different residual soils and observing the trend of variabilities in both soils.

It is often assumed that soil properties are the same throughouts a rather wide area when sampling for geotechnical tests. However, undetailed sampling can lead to conclusions that significantly differ from true soil behavior. Therefore, there is a need to quantify the amount of uncertainties attached to highway subgrade sampling so as to minimize design errors attached to undetailed sampling. The aim of this paper was to establish the degree of variation of some highway geotechnical parameters within restricted area underlain by different bedrocks. Phoon and Kulhawy recommend a statistical analysis including the coefficient of variation and the scale of fluctuation for this purpose [9]. However scale of fluctuation for evaluating spatial variability of parameters that can be obtained from in situ tests because they provide continuous record of ground properties [10].

**Location of Study Area**

A study location was located in Shao near Ilorin on latitude
N08°33.268’ and longitude E004°30.730’, while the second location was
located near Mokwa and it lies on latitude 09°12.484’ and longitude E
004°52.459’. These two locations belong to the same climatic belt and
but underlain by different bedrocks. Ilorin is underlain by Precambrian
Basement Complex rocks, while Mokwa is underlain by the Cretaceous
Sandstone Formation of the Bida Basin. The Bida Basin is a NW-SE
trending intracratonic sedimentary basin extending from Kontagora in
Niger State of Nigeria to areas slightly beyond Lokoja in the south. It is
delimited in the Northeast and Southwest by the Precambrian Basement
Complex [11]. **Figure 3** shows the location and geology of the study
areas. Nigeria is located within the tropics and therefore experiences
high temperatures throughout the year. The mean temperature for the country is 27 °C. Average maximum temperatures vary from 32°C
along the coast to 41°C in the far north, while minimum figures range
from 21°C in the coast to below 13°C in the north. The climate of the
country varies from a very wet coastal area with annual rainfall greater
than 3,500 mm to the Sahel region in the north eastern parts with
annual rainfall less than 600 mm. Generally, there is a distinct wet and
the dry season within a year. The length of the rainy season decreases
from 9-12 months in the south to only 3-4 months in the extreme
Northeast. Average rainfall in the northern limit of the belt is about 254
mm annually. Mean monthly relative humidity is about 29%. The study
area falls within the zone that receives 140-160 mm of rain per annum.

Two locations 15 m away from the highway with different exposed
bedrocks (Migmatite-Gneiss and Sandstones) were selected. In each
location, disturbed samples were taken at 5 m sampling interval
within gridded as shown in **Figure 4**. Index and engineering tests
relevant in highway geotechnics were carried out on the samples. All
tests were carried out in accordance with the British standard method
of testing soil 1377, modifications where necessary were however
made [13]. Determined parameters include consistency limits, grain
size distribution, specific gravity, compaction, soaked and unsoaked
California bearing ratio (CBR) permeability and compressibility. The
variability in the values of measured parameters was presented using
contour plots while coefficient of variation was used to measure the
degree of variation of these properties. The contour plots were made
using MATLAB curve fitting method. The higher the coefficient of
variation, the greater the dispersion in a set of variables and values up
to 10% is believed to show significant variability within any set of data.

**Linear shrinkage**

The linear shrinkage of the sandstone derived soil ranges from 1.5% to 7.3% while that of the soil developed over migmatite ranges from
2.2% to 10.1%. Although the linear shrinkage of the sandstone soil
is averagely lower than that of migmatite soil, it has higher standard
deviation, variance and coefficient of variation. **Figure 5** compares the
contour plots of the linear shrinkage values of the migmatite derived
(MG) soil samples and the sandstone derived (SS) soil samples. It
can be seen from this figure, that the contours for SS are more closely
spaced with highly contrasting colours than MG. This indicates higher
variability in the linear shrinkage values of the SS soil samples.

**Atterberg limits**

**Table 1** shows the values obtained from the statistical treatment
of data obtained from liquid limit, plastic limit and plasticity index of
the studied soils. The degree of variability in Atterberg limits values for
the sandstone soil is generally higher than that of the migmatite soil.
This can be observed in the consistently higher values of the coefficient
of variation characteristic of the sandstone soils. The coefficient of
variation in the Atterberg limit for the migmatite derived soil ranges
from 17.00% to 21.64% while that of the sandstone soil ranges from
11.26% to 17.32%. **Figures 6**-**8** show the contour plots of the Atterberg
limit of the studied soils. It can be noticed from these figures that the
Atterberg limit values of the SS soil samples vary more within the
gridded sampling area than the MG soil samples.

Soil type | Statistical parameter | Liquid limit (%) | Plastic limit (%) | Plasticity index (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|

Migmatite derivedsoil | Range | 28.4-49.1 | 16.0-30.8 | 11.03-27.06 |

Variance | 21.05 | 14.26 | 8.87 | |

Standard deviation | 4.59 | 3.78 | 2.98 | |

Coefficient of variation (%) | 11.29 | 16.35 | 17.32 | |

Sandstone derived soil | Range | 20.8-44.2 | 10.9-27.7 | 8.34-17 .04 |

Variance | 32.07 | 18.34 | 8.2 | |

Standard deviation | 5.66 | 4.28 | 2.86 | |

Coefficient of variation (%) | 17 | 21.34 | 21.64 |

**Table 1:** Statistical analysis of Atterberg Limits data.

**Grain size distribution parameters**

**Table 2** shows coefficient of variation of the grain size distribution
parameters of the studied soils. Variation up to 150% was recorded
in the grainsize distribution parameters of the studied soils. The high
coefficient of variation values associated with the grain size distribution
characteristics of these soils implies that their grain size distribution
characteristics vary significantly within restricted area. Except for
coefficient of curvature, the sandstone derived soil has higher coefficient
of variation than the MG soil. This implies that the sandstone derived
soil has higher level of heterogeneity than the SS one. **Figure 9** compares the contour plots of the amount of fines present in the SS soil with the
amount present in the MG soil.

Grain size distribution parameter | Coefficient of variation (%) | |
---|---|---|

Migmatite derived soil | Sandstone derived soil | |

Amount of gravel sized particles | 70.22 | 145.37 |

Amount of Sandsized particles | 23.34 | 22 |

Amount of silt sized particles | 33.58 | 53.92 |

Amount of clay sized particles | 68.94 | 95.86 |

Amount of fine particles | 32.47 | 45.22 |

Coefficient of Uniformity | 115.54 | 130.63 |

Coefficient of curvature | 136.75 | 150.9 |

**Table 2:** Statistical analysis of grain size parameters.

**Specific gravity, moisture content and derived atterberg
indices**

**Table 3** shows the summary of the statistical evaluation of spatial
variability in the specific gravity, moisture content derived indices of
both soils. The coefficient of variation in specific gravity values for the MG soil is similar to that of the sandstone ones. There is also little
spatial variation in specific gravity values across the gridded area. Since
specific gravity is a measure of degree of weathering, it implies that the
two set of soil have similar degree of weathering and are uniformly
weathered [14]. There is little variation in the spatial distribution of
moisture content for both set of soils. The degree of variations in the
values of parameters derived from index properties for the MG soil
is lower than those recorded for the SS soil. This trend can also be observed in the contour plots of the values of natural moisture content
and specific gravity of the studied soil shown in **Figures 10** and **11**.

Soil | Statistical parameter | Specific gravity | Moisture content (%) | Derivedatterberg indices | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

Flow index | Toughness index | ||||

Migmatite derived soil | Range | 2.6 –2.7 | 19.2 -25.66 | 15.30-32.4 | 0.45-1.22 |

Variance | 0.001 | 3.81 | 12.05 | 0.04 | |

Standard deviation | 0.03 | 1.95 | 3.47 | 0.19 | |

Coefficient of variation (%) | 1.28 | 8.59 | 17.14 | 21.67 | |

Sandstone derivedsoil | Range | 2.55 –2.7 | 13.98 -1.52 | 7.36-4.90 | 0.47-1.60 |

Variance | 0.002 | 3.27 | 19.86 | 0.08 | |

Standard deviation | 0.04 | 1.81 | 4.46 | 0.29 | |

Coefficient of variation (%) | 1.68 | 10.51 | 26.45 | 34.55 |

**Table 3:** Statistical analysis of data for specific gravity, moisture content and derived units.

**Moisture density relationship and California bearing ratio**

CBR is a measure of road subgrade strength and important
parameter used in highway design. **Table 4** presents the summary of the
statistical treatment of the results of CBR and compaction test carried out on both soils. While the coefficient of variation of the unsoaked
CBR and maximum dry density for the MG soil is higher than that
of the SS soil, the soaked CBR is higher for the sandstone soil. The
coefficient of variation for optimum moisture content for the SS soil
is higher than that of the MG soil. The differences in the coefficient of
variation for CBR and OMC of the studied soils are marginal. This is also evident from **Figures 12** and **13** which shows the contour plots for
OMC and CBR values respectively.

Soil | Statistical parameter | MDD(Kg/m^{3}) |
OMC (%) | Unsoaked CBR (%) | Soaked CBR (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

Migmatite derived soil | Range | 1830.05-1970.16 | 16.0-19.20 | 22.0-88.7 | 12.53-36.25 |

Variance | 41996.37 | 0.72 | 274.48 | 37.98 | |

Standard deviation | 204.93 | 0.85 | 16.57 | 6.16 | |

Coefficient of variation (%) | 11.3 | 4.86 | 29.07 | 27.39 | |

Sandstone derived soil | Range | 1070.02-1960.04 | 13.0-16.0 | 43.1-126.9 | 16.53-45.32 |

Variance | 1811.84 | 0.77 | 608.66 | 84.31 | |

Standard deviation | 42.57 | 0.88 | 24.67 | 9.18 | |

Coefficient of variation (%) | 2.23 | 6.03 | 27.51 | 28.31 |

**Table 4:** Summary of the statistical treatment of the CBR and moisture dry density values of the studied soil.

**Permeability and compressibility**

The coefficient of variation of the coefficient of permeability for the
MG soil is higher than that of the SS soil. **Table 5** shows the summary of
the determined statistical parameters for permeability and coefficient of
(volume) compressibility. The coefficient of variation of the coefficient
of (volume) compressibility for the MG soil is higher than that of the
SS soil.

Soil | Statistical Parameter | Permeability coefficient (cm/sec) | Coefficient of Volume Compressibility (m^{2}/KN) |
---|---|---|---|

Migmatite soil | Range | 9.2×10-7-3.5×10-6 | 4.4×10-5-6.1×10-4 |

Variance | 9.91×10-13 | 3.2×10-8 | |

Standard deviation | 9.96×10-7 | 1.8×10-4 | |

Coefficient of variation (%) | 54.35 | 43.38 | |

Sandstone soil | Range | 1.0×10-6-3.1×106 | 2.4×10-4-7.1×10-4 |

Variance | 8.4×10-13 | 3.3×10-8 | |

Standard deviation | 9.17×10-7 | 1.8×10-4 | |

Coefficient of variation (%) | 46 | 54.38 |

**Table 5:** Summary of the statistical treatment of the permeability and consolidation data.

**Figure 14** shows the contour plot of the coefficient of Permeability
values of the studied soil, while **Figure 15** shows the contour plot of the
coefficient of (volume) compressibility values. These figures also show
that the variability in the coefficient of permeability values of the MG
soil samples is more than that of the SS ones.

**Degree of variation and sampling**

Comparing **Figures 16** and **17**, it can be observed that the degree
of variability of the laboratory determined highway geotechnical
parameters for both set of soil vary similarly. The variation associated with the properties of the studied soils appears to be higher for some
parameters than it is for others. On this basis, for this work, the observed
coefficient of variations of the studied soils has been grouped into three.
Category one consist of parameters with relatively high coefficient of
variation, these include permeability, linear shrinkage and coefficient
of volume compressibility. Category two consist of parameters with
relatively moderate coefficient of variation, which include atterberg
limits, amount of fines, soaked and unsoaked CBR. Category three
consists of parameters with relatively low coefficient of variation,
which include moisture density parameters (MDD and OMC), natural
moisture content and specific gravity. Therefore, sampling for the
determination of properties belonging to category one should be most
detailed and more samples should be tested to minimise design error
due to using values that do not correctly represent the soil mass being
investigated.

Highway geotechnical parameters of two genetically different residual lateritic soils were treated statistically to determine the degree of variation associated with them within a restricted area. The coefficient of variation for the migmatite derived soil samples range between 1.28% and 54.40% while those of the sandstone derived soil range between 1.68% and 56.86%. Except for specific gravity, significant variability exists in the values of all determined highway geotechnical parameters of the studied soil samples within restricted area. Except for Permeability coefficient and unsoaked CBR, the Mokwa sandstone derived lateritic soil exhibits more heterogeneity than the Shao migmatite-gneiss derived one. Permeability coefficient, linear shrinkage and coefficient of volume compressibility possesses relatively high variability. Atterberg limits, amount of fines, soaked and unsoaked CBR have relatively moderate coefficient of variation while moisture density parameters (MDD and OMC), natural moisture content and specific gravity have relatively low variability. Therefore, detailed sampling, statistical analysis and geological considerations should be the basis for determination of parameters often utilised for foundation design for flexible highway pavement.

- Adeyemi GO, Oyeyemi F (1998) Geotechncial basis for failure of sections of the Lagos-Ibadan expressway, Southwestern Nigeria. Bull EngGeol Environ 39; 39-45.
- Abam TKS, Ofoegbu CO, Osadebe CC, Gobo AE (2000) Impact of hydrology on the Port-Harcourt-Patani-Warri Road. Environ Geol 40: 153-162.
- Campbell AE (2009)Federal road management for sub-Saharan African nations: A Nigerian case study.Ontario, Canada, pp: 125.
- Adeyemi GO, Wahab KA (2008) Variability in the geotechnical properties of a lateritic soil from southwestern Nigeria. J Int Ass Eng Geo Environ 67: 579-584.
- Mustapha M (2008)Physical properties of residual profile found in Minna. AU JT 11: 91-98.
- Adebisi NO, Adeyemi GO, Oluwafemi OS, Songca SP (2013) Importantproperties of clay content of lateritic soils for engineering project. J Geograp Geo.
- Eze EO, Adeyemi GO, Fasanmade PA (2014) Variability in some geotechnical properties of three lateritic sub-base soils along Ibadan oyoroad. J Applied GeolGeophy.
- Wang Yu, Zijun Cao, Dianqing Li (2016) Bayesian perspective on geotechnical variability and site characterization. Eng Geo 203: 117-125.
- Phoon KK, Kulhawy FH(1999) Evaluation of geotechnical variability. Canadian Geotech J 36: 625-639.
- Bronco LP, Gomes AT, Cardoso AS, Pereira CS (2014) Natural variability of shear strength in a granite residual soil from Porto. GeotechGeolEng 32: 911-922.
- Adeleye DR(1974) Sedimentology of the fluvial bidasandstones (cretaceous) Nigeria. Sediment Geo 12:1-24.
- Oyawoye M(1972)The basement complex of Nigeria. Ibadan. AfriGeolpp: 66-102.
- British Standard Institution(1990) Laboratory testing. London.
- Tuncer ER, Lohnes RA(1977)An engineering classification for basalt-derived lateritic soils. Eng Geo 4: 319-339.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

- Agricultural Biodiversity
- Atmosphere
- Atmospheric Chemistry
- Atmospheric inversions
- Biosphere
- Chemical Geology
- Chemical Oceanography
- Climate Change
- Climate science
- Climatology
- Coastal Meteorology
- Convective Storms
- Crystallography
- Deposition Geology
- Disaster
- Disaster Science
- ELNINO Effect
- Earth Science
- Earth sciences
- Ecology
- Environment
- Environment pollution
- Environmental Conservation
- Exploration Geophysics
- Floods
- Forecasting Algorithms
- Forensic Geology
- Gemology
- Geochemistry
- Geochronology
- Geographic information system
- Geography
- Geologic Time Scale
- Geological Engineering
- Geological Rock
- Geological Society of America
- Geology
- Geomicrobiology
- Geomorphology
- Geoscience
- Geosciences
- Geostatistics
- Glacial erosion
- Glaciology
- Global-Warming
- Globalisation
- Health ecology
- Hotspot Geology
- Hurricane Climatology
- Hydrogeology
- Mastering Geology
- Mesoscale Systems
- Mineralogy
- Natural Hazards
- Nature
- Nonconformity Geology
- Numerical Weather Prediction
- Ocean Warming
- Oklahoma Geological Survey
- Operational Forecasting
- Ozone Layer
- Physical Geography
- Physical Geology
- Polar Melting
- Precipitation
- Satellite Radiance
- Structural Geology
- Synoptic Climatology
- Tornado Climatology
- US Geological Earthquake
- US Geological Survey
- Volcanic Eruption
- Weather and Forecasting

- Total views:
**259** - [From(publication date):

May-2017 - Sep 23, 2017] - Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views :
**223** - PDF downloads :
**36**

Peer Reviewed Journals

International Conferences 2017-18