alexa Virus Inactivation Using a High Dose of Gamma-Irradiation: A Possible Approach for Safer Vaccines Against Highly Infectious Agents | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2157-7560
Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Virus Inactivation Using a High Dose of Gamma-Irradiation: A Possible Approach for Safer Vaccines Against Highly Infectious Agents

Mohammed Alsharifi* and Shannon C. David

Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Research Centre for Infectious Diseases, School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia

*Corresponding Author:
Mohammed Alsharifi
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Research Centre for Infectious Diseases
School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide
Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia
Tel: +61883134632
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: May 11, 2017; Accepted date: May 22, 2017; Published date: May 26, 2017

Citation: Alsharifi M, David SC (2017) Virus Inactivation Using a High Dose of Gamma-Irradiation: A Possible Approach for Safer Vaccines Against Highly Infectious Agents. J Vaccines Vaccin 8:360. doi:10.4172/2157-7560.1000360

Copyright: © 2017 Alsharifi M, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination

Short Communication

Vaccination is arguably the most crucial protection strategy available against infectious agents. The World Health Organisation (WHO) estimates immunisations against the pathogens diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, and measles avert 2-3 million deaths every year [1]. However, despite our advanced knowledge and the availability of highly effective vaccines against many diseases, several infectious agents, such as influenza A virus, continue to be a major scientific challenge. Accumulating reports of human infection with Avian influenza strains H5N6, H7N9, H9N2, and the highly pathogenic H5N1 illustrate a major public health concern. Current seasonal influenza vaccines will not protect against newly emerging pandemic strains if they acquire efficient human-human transmission and disseminate through the population. In fact, commercially available inactivated vaccines against influenza A virus confer strain specific antibody-mediated protection only, and require annual reformulation to accommodate for the frequent emergence of antigenically distinct strains. In addition, the WHO recommendation for flu vaccine formulation is based on an educated-guess approach guided by WHO surveillance of recent virus activity. Our recent encounter with the pandemic pH1N1 influenza A virus in 2009 illustrates the inability of current flu vaccination strategies to control novel emerging and pandemic strains. The time required to manufacture new vaccines based on newly arising strains similarly limits the effectiveness of current strategies. These shortcomings highlight the need for a new approach to develop flu vaccines that are capable of providing protection against emerging strains.

We have previously reported the use of gamma-irradiation to inactivate Influenza A virus for vaccine purposes, and illustrated the ability of this vaccine (γ-Flu) to induce cross-protective immunity against both seasonal and pandemic virus strains, including Avian H5N1 [2]. Importantly, we demonstrated the ability of γ-Flu to induce cross-reactive cytotoxic T-cell responses [3] as well as strain-specific neutralising antibody responses [4]. We have recently published the possibility of using irradiation doses as high as 50 kGy to inactivate influenza A virus without severely affecting vaccine immunogenicity [5]. The possible use of high irradiation dose would allow inclusion of highly pathogenic Influenza A strains in future vaccine formulations. This approach could also be used to develop a contingency plan against future pandemics, including the possibility of vaccine stockpiling as we have previously illustrated the stability of freeze-dried γ-Flu formulations [6].

It is generally accepted that inactivation of microorganisms using γ- irradiation follows physical laws, including the concept of an ‘exponential law’, whereby there always exists a finite probability that an organism may survive irrespective of the irradiation dose used [7]. To ensure sterility of irradiated materials, the concept of Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) has been adopted, which refers to the probability of micro-organisms surviving the irradiation process [8]. SAL is arbitrarily determined and a value of 10-3 or 10-6 (one in a thousand or a million chance of having live microorganisms in any one unit) has been widely accepted. To estimate the irradiation dose required to achieve a chosen SAL, a mathematical concept based on the decimal reduction value (the D10 value) has been used [9]. The D10 value refers to the irradiation dose required to inactivate 90% of the microbial population (i.e. a dose causing a single log10 reduction). In fact, while a SAL value of 10-3 or 10-6 has been widely accepted, exposure to higher radiation doses that exceed the critical parameter of SAL can be considered as an effective approach to further reduce the probability of any live pathogens persisting after irradiation [10]. In addition, an exposure to an irradiation dose of 50 kGy has been largely considered as mandatory for treatment of products suspected of being contaminated with highly pathogenic agents (e.g. H5N1 Influenza, Ebola) [9]. However, an exposure to high irradiation dose may be associated with extensive damage to antigenic structure, consequently affecting vaccine efficacy.

It is important to emphasize that the “radiation sensitivity” of a pathogen is mainly related to damage to nucleic acid structure (for example, single- or double-strand breaks, cross-linkages, and other nucleotide damage). In addition, gamma-irradiation has been shown to be associated with protein damage [11], including fragmentation due to breakage of covalent bonds within the polypeptide chain [12]. This is illustrated by excessive damage to Murine Norovirus 1 (MNV-1) capsid protein VP1 following irradiation with increased doses of gamma-rays at room temperature [13]. Importantly, modulating irradiation conditions could help control the extent of the structural damage. Our recently published data illustrate that irradiation of influenza A virus on dry ice is associated with limited structural damage compared to irradiation at room temperature [5]. Our data show that influenza A virus irradiated at room temperature suffered significantly greater loss of surface protein functionality and increased damage to virion integrity, leading to reduced vaccine efficacy. In contrast, irradiation on dry-ice aided preservation of virion integrity and allowed for significant maintenance of antigenic epitopes. Thus, our data illustrated the high immunogenicity of materials irradiated on dry-ice, despite the exposure to 50 kGy. Achieving vaccine sterility without damaging antigenic epitopes is essential for future development of highly effective vaccines. Interestingly, irradiation of frozen materials (at -80°C) has also been reported previously for inactivation of Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus (VEEV) and Eastern Equine Encephalitis Virus (EEEV) for vaccine purposes using high doses of irradiation. VEEV irradiated with 50 kGy was reported to induce protection against subcutaneous and aerosol challenge with live virus in mice [14]. In addition, EEEV irradiated with 100 kGy was shown to induce both neutralising antibody responses and protection against aerosol challenge [15]. These studies support our early proposal regarding the suitability of gammairradiation to inactivate highly infectious agents for vaccine purposes [7]. A combination of high irradiation dose and a controlled irradiation temperature appeared to be sufficient to minimise structural damage, and consequently ensures vaccine safety and efficacy. This technique may be applied to pathogens against which vaccine design has been inherently complicated. Recent reports of phase I human clinical trials of an attenuated HIV vaccine doublytreated with gamma-irradiation (30 kGy) and chemical inactivation (Trial Registration: Clinical Trials NCT01546818) illustrate the effectiveness of gamma-irradiation as a clinically relevant vaccine inactivation method [16].

Overall, gamma-irradiation represents a very promising approach for development of highly effective vaccines. The high immunogenicity of materials irradiated with 50 kGy considerably expands the list of pathogens suitable for irradiation treatment for vaccine purposes. In addition, irradiation may be used to inactivate existing live attenuated vaccines to enhance safety and to allow for administration of an increased antigen dose without compromising efficacy.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 377
  • [From(publication date):
    June-2017 - Sep 22, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 323
  • PDF downloads :54
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords