alexa
Reach Us +441474556909
Volume Based Measurement of Fabric Drape using Surfer Software and Studies on Effect of Influencing Factors | OMICS International
ISSN: 2165-8064
Journal of Textile Science & Engineering
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Volume Based Measurement of Fabric Drape using Surfer Software and Studies on Effect of Influencing Factors

Gnanavel P1* and Ananthakrishnan T2

1Deptartment of Textile Technology, KSR College of Technology, Tamilnadu, India

2Deptartment of Textile Technology, Govt. SKSJT Institute, Karnataka, India

*Corresponding Author:
Gnanavel P
Deptartment of Textile Technology
KSR College of Technology
Tiruchengode 637-215
Tamilnadu,India
Tel: +91-997-61-67-66
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: May 13, 2014; Accepted Date: May 16, 2014; Published Date: May 19, 2014

Citation: Gnanavel P, Ananthakrishnan T (2014) Volume Based Measurement of Fabric Drape using Surfer Software and Studies on Effect of Influencing Factors. J Textile Sci Eng 4:159. doi: 10.4172/2165-8064.1000159

Copyright: © 2014 Gnanavel P, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Textile Science & Engineering

Abstract

The human being needs more comfort on clothing than its color, design and appearance. Drape is one of the important factor influencing the aesthetics and comfort of fabrics. In the initial days fabric drape was measured by using Cusick’s drape meter. Due to technology development and up gradation several instruments were developed by many researchers. In this research work one such latest technology was used to measure fabric drape in three dimensional way using SURFER software.

Here, the instrument used for measuring fabric drape was slightly modified from the Cusick Drape meter. The perforated circular disc was placed over the sample to measure the xyz coordinates of sample on radials range from 9.5cm to 14.5cm at each 5o intervals. The civil engineers use XYZ coordinates to measure the surface the of land profile (either hill or valley) using software. The same concept was followed to measure the profile of drape in three dimensional way using SURFER software. The xyz values are fed as input to the software and it generates contour lines, 3D view, vector lines, drape volume and drape profile area as output.

The drape coefficient was computed from the volume of drape profile and analyzed to study the effect of six different seams, seam directions and number of stitches with two different stitch densities. The seam type, number of stitches (single/double), their interaction density * number of stitches and stitch density * seam have significant effect on volume based drape coefficient.

The calculated volume (obtained from average radius and height) is compared with volume generated by SURFER software method and it was found that there is significance difference exists.

Keywords

Drape coefficient; Seam; Seam direction; Drape meter

Introduction

Clothing is one of the fundamental needs of the human being. It acts as the interface between the body and the environment and influences the comfort perceptions of the wearer.

Clothing selection is based on the needs and desires of the people. By touching one gets information such as perception of the surface, its temperature, hardness and roughness, etc. All though in some cases it is recommended to wear certain clothing and selection is not possible, for example dress of a fire fighter, military uniform, etc. Textiles differ from other technical structures in that it must have sufficient strength and at the same time it is to be flexible, elastic and easy to pleat and shape.

The clothing satisfies some aesthetic needs or fulfills any particular demand of human being. Aesthetics is a branch of philosophy dealing with the nature of beauty, art and taste with the creation and appreciation of beauty. It is more scientifically defined as the study of sensory or sensory-emotional values. The fabrics or garments are comfortable in aesthetic and physiological sense when we evaluate textiles in traditional use [1-5].

There are number of properties of fabric which plays a significant role in aesthetic comfort. Some are listed below;

1. Bending rigidity

2. Drape

3. Thickness

4. Grams per meter square (density)

5. Surface smoothens

6. Compressibility

7. Stretch ability

8. Shear rigidity

9. Bulkiness

10. Surface friction

11. Air permeability

12. Moisture permeability

Drape is one of the important terms to express the comfort and aesthetics of apparel products. Drape is a property which characterizes the shape of a fabric when it is hanging down of its own weight. “Drape Co-efficient (DC)” is the main parameter used to quantify fabric drape. Several physical properties have been suggested as contributors to the drape of woven fabrics. Drapability of a fabric is combined effect of several factors such as: stiffness, flexural rigidity, weight, thickness etc. It plays a significant role in providing graceful aesthetic effects in garment [6-9].

There are number of testing instruments which are used to assess the aesthetic comfort of fabrics. One such instrument is Cusick’s drape meter. The drape node number and drape coefficient are important factors to express the drape behavior of fabric, which was calculated from the shadow obtained in drape meter.

The presence of seam line influences the drape of the fabrics. The fabric has more stiff along the seam line than the remaining parts. However, fabric drape can be more realistically investigated by considering seams. The fabric is converted into garment by means of seam. The seam is a line where two or more fabrics are joined. The stitch is the configuration of the interlacing of sewing thread in a specific repeated unit [10].

This research focuses the new method to measure the third dimension of fabric drape with an attachment designed to Cusick’s drape meter and to study the effect of various seams, seam directions, number of stitches (single/double) with two stitch densities on drape. The SURFER software package generates drape profiles and provides detailed information for analysis of drape in better way (Figure 1) [11- 14].

textile-science-engineering-experimental-flow-chart

Figure 1: Experimental flow chart.

Materials

To analyze the effect of various seams in different directions with two stitch densities the following yarn and fabric particulars were used (Tables 1-3).

S.No Particulars Values
1 Yarn Count, Tex, (Ne ) 14.7x2,(2/40)
CV 2.4
2 Twist per cm,(TPI) 6.85, (17.4)
CV 3
3 CSP 5298
CV 3.1
4 Blend composition, %  
Polyester 65
Cotton 35

Table 1: Yarn Particulars.

S.No Particulars Values
1 Warp and weft yarn Count,  Tex, (Ne ) 14.7x2,(2/40)
2 Threads per cm
Warp (Ends per Inch) 24.4 (62)
Weft (Picks per Inch) 22.8 (58)
3 GSM 148.3
4 Crimp %  
Warp 7.8
Weft 5.1
5 Breaking load, kg  
Warp way 74.9
Weft way 63.4
6 Bending Length (cm)  
Warp way 2.36
Weft way 2.18
7 Elongation %  
Warp way 101
Weft way 13.2

Table 2: Fabric Particulars.

1 Polyester sewing thread  
count, Tex, Ne 14.5x2, 19.5
Ticket Number 99
CV 2.2
2 Twist per cm, (TPI) 7.2, (18.3)
CV 5.6
3 Yarn Strength, kg 1.09
CV 2.32
4 Elongation % 10.9
CV 5.2

Table 3: Sewing Thread Particulars.

Pre-treatment

The following sequences of pre treatment were given to the fabric.

Scouring → bleaching → cold wash → neutralization → calendaring

Cutting and stitching

The fabric is cut and sewn 3 different directions (warp, weft and bias) with single & double stitches as shown below (Figure 2).

textile-science-engineering-seam-directions

Figure 2: Seam directions.

D1 sgl: Single row of stitch parallel to warp

D1 dbl: Double row of stitches parallel to warp

D2 sgl: Single row of stitch parallel to weft

D2 dbl: Double row of stitches parallel to weft

D3 sgl: Single row of stitch in bias direction

D3 dbl: Double row of stitches in bias direction.

Stitch types

Stitch is one unit of thread formation by passing the needle thread through the material and interlocking with a bottom thread.

SEAM. A seam is a joint consisting of a sequence of stitches uniting two or more pieces of fabric material. In this project, six most common types of seams are used to make samples from two groups, ie superimposed seam, and lapped seams.

Class SS, Superimposed Seams: The superimposed seams are formed by placing two plies of fabrics one over other and seam it. Superimposed seams are usually made with two plies of material, although more than two plies can be used for special projects. Types of superimposed seams used are SSa, SSa-1 and SSq.

Class LS-Lapped Seams: Lapped seams are formed by overlapping the material with sufficient distance and stitch it with one or more rows. Types of lapped seams used are LSba, LSc-2, and welt. It is shown below (Figure 3).

textile-science-engineering-different-seam-types

Figure 3: Different seam types.

Methodology

Surfer software method

In this method perforated disc was placed over the sample and XYZ values were measured by at each 50 intervals on different radial diameters such as 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, and 29 using specially designed scale, which is shown below (Figure 4).

textile-science-engineering-circular-perforated-disc

Figure 4: Circular perforated disc.

The XYZ values are fed input to Surfer software, which is a gridbased mapping program that interpolates irregularly spaced XYZ data into a regularly spaced grid. The grid is used to produce different types of maps including contour, vector, image, shaded relief, 3D surface, and 3D wire frame maps (Figure 5).

textile-science-engineering-procedural-flow-chart

Figure 5: Procedural flow chart.

The surfer generates grid file from X,Y,Z values which was used to generate contour map, 3D map, vector map, etc.

Gridding overview

A grid is a rectangular region comprised of evenly spaced rows and columns. The intersection of a row and column is called a grid node. Rows contain grid nodes with the same Y coordinate, and columns contain grid nodes with the same X coordinate. Gridding generates a Z value at each grid node by interpolating or extrapolating the data values.

Advantages of using surfer

It generates the 3D drape profile along with contour lines using the XYZ data, which is illustrated in the above figure 6).

textile-science-engineering-contour-map-vector

Figure 6: Contour map, 3D map and Vector map of same sample.

The contour map shows lines of equal elevation (i.e. depth in this case) of the draped fabric. The lines spaced closely indicate a steeper bending, while the spaced line indicates more flatter region.

From the same map a 3D Surface can be generated which gives the visual appearance of draped sample. The Vector map shows the direction and magnitude of flow that is curvatures and also we can visualize top and front view of drape profile using this software (Figure 7).

textile-science-engineering-rotated-profile-picture

Figure 7: Rotated profile of the picture.

Drape profile volume measurement

The SURFER software also measures volume of drape profile. This volume data is used as additional parameter along with drape coefficient to quantify fabric drape. The normalized volume of drape is defined as follows

Normalized Drape volume = Volume of drape profile / (Max. Volume - Min. Volume) =Volume of drape profile / 2715 (3.14*15*15*6) – (3.14*9*9*6)

The low value of Normalized volume indicates the material is more stiff as it increases the material bends easily [15,16].

Results and Discussion

Effect of stitch densities, seams, and seam direction on volume based drape

(Nominalized volume) (Table 4)

S.No Stitch density Seam type Direction Number of stitch Volume Normalized volume
1 9 S1 warp single 641 0.2362
2 double 651 0.2397
3 weft single 659 0.2427
4 double 689 0.2539
5 bias single 624 0.23
6 double 634 0.2335
7 S2 warp single 622 0.229
8 double 617 0.2272
9 weft single 575 0.2117
10 double 647 0.2384
11 bias single 563 0.2073
12 double 590 0.2173
13 S3 warp single 620 0.2283
14 double 611 0.2252
15 weft single 641 0.2362
16 double 555 0.2044
17 9 S3 bias single 658 0.2423
18 double 593 0.2186
19 S4 warp single 617 0.2272
20 double 588 0.2167
21 weft single 598 0.2202
22 double 618 0.2276
23 bias single 638 0.2349
24 double 553 0.2038
25 S5 warp single 599 0.2206
26 double 553 0.2036
27 weft single 590 0.2173
28 double 599 0.2206
29 bias single 592 0.2182
30 double 543 0.2
31 S6 warp single 634 0.2337
32 double 551 0.2029
33 weft single 558 0.2055
34 double 543 0.2001
35 bias single 552 0.2033
36 double 552 0.2034
37 13 S1 warp single 643 0.2478
38 double 569 0.2095
39 weft single 606 0.2232
40 double 614 0.2261
41 bias single 628 0.2313
42 double 606 0.2232
43 S2 warp single 636 0.2342
44 double 573 0.211
45 weft single 636 0.2342
46 double 564 0.2077
47 bias single 643 0.2368
48 double 510 0.1878
49 13 S3 warp single 566 0.2084
50 double 552 0.2033
51 weft single 610 0.2246
52 double 479 0.1764
53 bias single 566 0.2084
54 double 483 0.1779
55 S4 warp single 592 0.218
56 double 558 0.2055
57 weft single 568 0.2092
58 double 613 0.2257
59 bias single 630 0.232
60 double 559 0.2058
61 S5 warp single 676 0.2489
62 double 670 0.2467
63 weft single 632 0.2327
64 double 603 0.222
65 bias single 641 0.236
66 double 629 0.2316
67 S6 warp single 634 0.2335
68 double 649 0.239
69 weft single 628 0.2313
70 double 566 0.2084
71 bias single 621 0.2287
72 double 597 0.2198

Table 4: Normalized volume values of samples in SURFER software method.

Dependent variable: Normalized drape volume

Independent variables: Stitch density (2), Seam (6), Direction (3), Number of Stitch (2)

Null hypotheses: There is no effect of stitch density on Normalized drape volume.

There is no effect of seam on Normalized drape volume.

There is no effect of number of stitches on Normalized drape volume.

There is no interaction effect of various factors on Normalized drape volume.

Alternative hypotheses: Stitch density has a significant effect on Normalized drape volume.

Density has a significant effect on Normalized drape volume.

Seam has a significant effect on Normalized drape volume.

Direction has a significant effect on Normalized drape volume.

Number of Stitches has a significant effect on Normalized drape volume.

There is a significant interaction effect of various factors on Normalized drape volume (Table 5) [17-20].

Source Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Density 2.94E-05 1 2.94E-05 0.233 0.632
Seam 0.003 5 0.001 4.274 .004*
Direction 0 2 0 1.97 0.154
No.of.stitches 0.002 1 0.002 16.96 .000*
Density * Direction 0 2 5.17E-05 0.411 0.666
Density *No.of.stitches 0 1 0 3.264 .079**
Density * Seam 0.005 5 0.001 8.517 .000*
Direction *No.of.stitches 0 2 0 1.028 0.368
Seam * Direction 0.001 10 8.54E-05 0.679 0.737
Seam *No.of.stitches 0.001 5 0 1.177 0.339
Error 0.005 37 0    
Total 3.523 72      

Table 5:Anova results of samples- Volume (Surfer method).

It can be seen from the above table that a high value of F5,37 (4.274) and p-value of 0.004 for the factor Seam verify that the corresponding null hypothesis is rejected at 5% level of significance.

The F1,.37 value of 16.956 with a p-value of 0.000 for the factor Number of stitches (single/double) verify that the corresponding null hypothesis is significant at 5% level of significance and hence rejected.

It can also be seen from the above table that the value of F for the other main effect such as Density and Direction do not have any significant effect on Normalized drape volume.

The value of F1,10 (3.264) with a p-value of 0.079 for the interaction between Density* Number of stitches verify that the null hypothesis is marginally rejected at 10% level of significance.

The F5,10 value of (8.517) with p-value of 0.000 for the interaction between Density* Seam verify that the corresponding null hypothesis is rejected at 5% level of significance. The other interactions do not have any significant impact on Normalized drape volume.

Also it can be noted from the table that R-Square value is 0.737, which means that the model can explain about73.7 per cent of variability in Normalized drape volume. This is higher than that of drape co-efficient (71.5 percent), thus is more discriminative measure to characterize drape.

Comparison of volume generated by SURFER software and calculated volume

The volume of drape profile to be computed from average radius and height values and it is compared with the volume generated by SURFER software method (Table 6 and 7).

S.No Stitch Density Seam type Direction No.of Stitches Calculated volume Volume by SURFER
1 13 S1 Warp sgl 573.7 673
2 dbl 501.5 569
3 Weft sgl 496 606
4 dbl 522.3 614
5 Bias sgl 524.5 628
6 dbl 509.7 606

Table 6: computed volume and SURFER volume for seam type 1.

Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 26878.7 1 26879 28 0.0004 4.9
Within Groups 9730.1 10 973      
Total 36608.9 11        

Table 7: Anova results of sample (computed volume and SURFER volume).

From the results there is significant difference exists between computed volume and volume by SURFER. The volume computed by average height and radius gives only the volume of frustum. It doesn’t include irregularities on drape profile, but SURFER volume gives the exact volume of drape profile including drape nodes and other irregularities over surface [21-24].

Conclusion

Measurement of depth and analysis by SURFER software has opened up a new drape parameter namely Normalized volume based drape to be defined. The seam type, number of stitches (single/double), their interaction density* number of stitches and stitch density* seam have significant effect on volume based drape coefficient. The other main factors and interactions do not have significant effect on volume based drape.

The image processing method and other old techniques gives information about the 2D image of drape profile and drape profile area. Measuring the depth and use of SURFER software provides the detailed information about drape profile area, drape profile volume, 3D image of drape profile in 3600 with rotation, vector image, contour image and variogram. Further one can easily identify the seam line on the image. It is a new tool to quantify the drape in better way.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Article Usage

  • Total views: 13229
  • [From(publication date):
    August-2014 - Aug 18, 2019]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 9423
  • PDF downloads : 3806
Top