alexa Optimizing UHPLC Fittings and Connections: A Case Study | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2157-7064
Journal of Chromatography & Separation Techniques
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Optimizing UHPLC Fittings and Connections: A Case Study

Eduard Rogatsky*, Shaynah B, Cai M and Daniel TS

Biomarker Analytical Resource Core, Einstein-Montefiore Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Eduard Rogatsky
Biomarker Analytical Resource Core
Einstein-Montefiore Institute for Clinical and Translational Research
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, USA
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: July 25, 2013; Accepted Date: August 16, 2013; Published Date: August 19, 2013

Citation: Rogatsky E, Shaynah B, Cai M, Daniel TS (2013) Optimizing UHPLC Fittings and Connections: A Case Study. J Chromatograph Separat Techniq 4:193. doi: 10.4172/2157-7064.1000193

Copyright: © 2013 Rogatsky E, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Chromatography & Separation Techniques

Abstract

We experienced persistent problems in achieving robust connections in UHPLC applications utilizing sub-3 micron particle size reversed phase chromatographic columns. Our application involved column testing, which involves frequent disconnection and re-connection of different columns into/from the flow path ofthe UHPLC system. In this paper we report our findings and recommendations.

Case Report

UHPLC abbreviates Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography. UHPLC is the next generation of liquid chromatographic separation, based on higher pressures of 800-1200 bar, while standard HPLC instrumentation was designed for pressure limits of 400-600 bar. The evolution of HPLC into UHPLC deeply impacted many different aspects of routine chromatography. UHPLC is not just an HPLC upgrade that reproducibly delivers mobile phases at higher pressure. First of all, UHPLC is designed to operate sub-3 µm particle size chromatographic columns and is optimized for transfer of narrow chromatographic peaks with minimal distortion to the detector[1-3].

Initial UHPLC systems utilized non-adjustable metallic fittings. Once a ferrule becomes compressed and locked, it cannot be moved (Figure 1). That design provided maximum ruggedness, although it is advantageous only if one specific column brand is used. Different column manufacturers have some differences in design of the column end-fittings. As a result, true zero dead volume connection might not be achieved and chromatographic peaks will be distorted [3,4]. In this case, brand new tubing and new set of fittings should be installed.

chromatography-separation-techniques-UHPLC-fitting

Figure 1: Non-adjustable 2 piece ferrule UHPLC fitting. Once a ferrule becomes compressed and locked, it cannot be moved.

Adjustable and reusable fittings provide much more flexibility for chromatographers. There are different varieties of HPLC and UHPLC fittings that are available in the market. However the choice of the right fittings is not simple and it should be based on the application. Typically, metallic ferrules should be avoided with PEEK tubing, because during tightening of a metallic ferrule, softer polymeric tubing will be compressed. As a result, the tubing surface where the metallic ferrule grips will slightly shrink; tubing internal diameter will be slightly decreased, causing a noticeable rise in backpressure (author unpublished observation). If the metallic ferrule is tightened and untightened several times, the back pressure may increase more. We have observed that some high pressure rated adjustable fittings perfectly holdpressure when they are newly installed. However, they do not hold pressure anymore after a few dis-and reconnections. Certain UHPLC fittings are more prone to be over-tightened and require more torque control during tightening; a serious problem can result where they can become stuck inside of the valve port or column. Such problems with connections rarely occur with standard HPLC applications where operational pressures are typically below 250 bar.

We purchased an Agilent 1290 UHPLC system (Wilmington, Delaware, USA), including the column thermostat modelG1316C, equipped with low volume heat exchanger G1316-80003. The heat exchanger tubing (thin capillary) is connectable to the LC column by re-adjustable fittings equipped with polymeric ferrules (Figure 2). The outlet of the heat exchanger was standard stainless steel 1.6 mm (1/16 inch) outside diameter, while inside of the heat exchanger it is a thin and soft capillary (Figure 3). During initial method development we tested various columns to find the best efficiency and selectivity in our application. Column testing requires frequent column exchange, and we observed that a column replacement is not a quick simple task as expected. Original end fitting requires at least a few adjustments (re-tightening by wrench) to assure absence of a leak from the fitting in the operation pressure range. After several column replacements, the ferrule becomes compressed and is either stuck inside a column or not maintaining high pressures anymore. The thin capillary heat exchanger tubing during tightening of a fitting often becomes severely bent and eventually broken. Oncebroken, the entire heat exchanger module has to be removed and replaced. Since the heat exchanger design appears to beless rugged and more fragile than expected, we added an extra union and short tubing between the column and heat exchanger outlet in order to protect the heat exchanger unit, the ferrule and to simplify tightening (Figure 4). However, such a design adds extra volume and changes the retention time (data not shown), which should be avoided. Many adjustable UHPLC fittings equipped with polymeric ferrules are optimal for polymeric tubing, but not ones that are made from stainless steel. This is because polymeric ferrules are softer then stainless steel, and cannot provide sufficient grip strength around the tubing at UHPLC pressures (unlike HPLC). After many trials, and various connection combinations, we found a simple and complete solution. The original heat exchanger nut and polymeric ferrule were removed (Figure 3) and replaced by EXP H and-Tight Nut and Titanium Hybrid Ferrulekit (p#15-20-03888) available from Optimize Technologies (Oregon City, OR USA) (Figure 5). This fitting utilizes a novel sealing concept, and consists of both PEEK and titanium in a one piece ferrule. This unique hybrid design ensures the integrity of the seal at UHPLC pressures (above 1400 bar). This fitting allows hand tightening followed by only a half turn adjustment with the wrench. This protects the fragile heat exchanger capillary from mechanical stress load and potential damage during repeated column installation or removals (Figure 6).

chromatography-separation-techniques-polymeric-ferrule

Figure 2: Agilent 1290 re-adjustable polymeric ferrule.

chromatography-separation-techniques-Heat-ecxhanger

Figure 3: Heat ecxhanger outleet tubing design.

chromatography-separation-techniques-short-tubing

Figure 4: Union and additional short tubing was added to protect fragile heat exchanger tubing and polymeric ferrule.

chromatography-separation-techniques-Original-fittings

Figure 5: Original fittings was replaced by EXP Hand-Tight Nut and Titanium Hybrid Ferrule.

chromatography-separation-techniques-mechanical-effort

Figure 6: No mechanical effort in UHPLC column installation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we would like to mention there is no straightforward process for finding the optimal fitting because of the current variety of different products in the LC market. This necessitates detailed knowledge of hardware. In addition, for any chromatographic system, there is no perfect design, and some optimization is always required.

Acknowledgements

The project described was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), through CTSA grant numbers UL1TR000086, TL1R000087, KL2TR000088. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11821
  • [From(publication date):
    August-2013 - Nov 21, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7974
  • PDF downloads : 3847
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords