alexa Analysis with Ultrasound of Different Surgical Meshes for Abdominal Hernia Repair: Experimental Study
ISSN: 2161-0940

Anatomy & Physiology: Current Research
Open Access

Like us on:
OMICS International organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations

700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Research Article

Analysis with Ultrasound of Different Surgical Meshes for Abdominal Hernia Repair: Experimental Study

Grossi JVM1*, Manna BB2, Montes JHM3, Nicola RF3, Nery LA2, Cavazzola S4, Cavazzola LT5 and Leão HZ6

1Resident of Gastroentestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, General Surgery, Saint Lucas Hospital, Pontific Catholic University of Porto Alegre, PUCRS Porto Alegre-RS, Brazil

2Faculty of Medicine, Lutheran University of Brazil, Brazil

3Department of Radiology, Saint Lucas Hospital, Pontific Catholic University of Porto Alegre RS, Brazil

4Faculty of Medicine, Lutheran University of Brazil, Brazil

5Full Professor of Morphology and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Lutheran University of Brazil, Brazil

6Full Professor of Human Anatomy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre - RS, Brazil

*Corresponding Author:
João Vicente Machado Grossi
Department of Surgery, General Surgery, Saint Lucas Hospital
Pontific Catholic University of Porto Alegre
PUCRS Porto Alegre-RS, Brazil
Tel: 55 51 81550660
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: April 12, 2014; Accepted date: June 14, 2014; Published date: June 16, 2014

Citation: Grossi JVM, Manna BB, Montes JHM, Nicola RF, Nery LA, et al. (2014) Analysis with Ultrasound of Different Surgical Meshes for Abdominal Hernia Repair: Experimental Study. Anat Physiol 4:148. doi: 10.4172/2161-0940.1000148

Copyright: © 2014 Grossi JVM, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

 

 

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the ultrasound dampening effect of the different types of meshes abdominal surgery after implantation in Wistar rats.
Method: We used two Wistar rats, assessed positions and different types of meshes. The animals were anesthetized prior to surgery to open the abdominal cavity for placement of the prosthesis. Divided into three stages, 1) analysis of the abdominal cavity with ultrasound and no mesh 2) onlay position (mesh placed anterior the abdominal muscles) 3) underlay (intraperitoneal) for the posterior muscular. The meshes were used polypropylene (PP), polyester (PE), polypropylene/poliglecaprone (PU), polytetrafluoroethylene condensate (MO), polyester/ collagen (PC) and polypropylene/polydioxanone/oxidized regenerated cellulose (PRO). The animals were euthanized after the procedure.
Results: There was no need to exclude the animals. The initial assessment showed no areas of difficulty or ease that would harm the exam. In all analyzes there was no problem identifying the the skin and subcutaneous tissue. There was a statistically significant difference in the attenuation of the meshes in both the onlay position p<0.001. Underlay position there was a small improvement in the graduation, with PE median (min-max) of 3 (2-5), PP, PU with 2 (1-5) and PC 2 (2-5) followed by PRO mesh with 1 (2-5) and MO with 0 (0-5) with statistical significance at p=0.001. However there was no comparison to the same mesh in two positions on the all meshes.
Conclusion: All types of meshes used in this study was independent of the position of the sound degree attenuation in ultrasound examination. The polyester mesh got to take a lower degree of attenuation compared with other meshes of the study. Is needed a new test to check the attenuation in the long term.

Share This Page

Additional Info

Loading
Loading Please wait..
 
 
Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords