Are Statistics Misleading Sodium Reduction Benefits?
|Angela A Stanton*|
|Independent Researcher, P.O. Box 18863, Anaheim, CA 92817, USA|
|Corresponding Author :||Angela A Stanton
P.O. Box 18863, Anaheim
CA 92817, USA
E-mail: [email protected]
|Received date: Dec 19, 2015, Accepted date: Jan 22, 2016, Published date: Feb 3, 2016|
|Citation: Stanton AA (2016) Are Statistics Misleading Sodium Reduction Benefits?. J Med Diagn Meth 5:196. doi:10.4172/2168-9784.1000196|
|Copyright: © 2016 Stanton AA. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.|
|Related article at Pubmed, Scholar Google|
There is a global movement toward lowering the blood pressure (BP) to prevent cardiovascular disease. Researchers use statistical power test on dietary increased sodium and point to the resulting elevation in BP as proof that salt increases BP. However, while tests show that the increase in BP is not by chance and is the result of increased salt intake and it also shows that this increase is consistent across test subjects, the results do not show that the magnitude of increase in BP is significant enough to warrant concern. Similarly, it is questionable if the reduction in dietary salt culminates in meaningful BP reduction. Statistics mislead when misunderstood. We show that dietary salt changes do not represent significant variation in BP but reduction of salt significantly may increase triglycerides, which may be more harmful.