alexa Assessment Of Selection Criteria For Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
ISSN: 2375-4273

Health Care : Current Reviews
Open Access

OMICS International organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations

700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Research Article

Assessment Of Selection Criteria For Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Szmigielska A1Paradowski PT1-3*

1Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Arthroscopy of the Knee Joint, Medical University, Radlinski Hospital, Drewnowska 75, 91-002 Lódz, Poland

2Department of Orthopedics, Sunderby Central Hospital of Norrbotten, SE-971 80 Luleå, Sweden

3Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical University Clinical Hospital WAM, Zeromskiego 113, 90-549 Lódz, Poland

Corresponding Author:
Przemyslaw T. Paradowski
Department of Orthopedics
Sunderby Central Hospital of Norrbotten
SE-971 80 Luleå, Sweden
Tel: +46708329574
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: October 01, 2013; Accepted date: October 22, 2013; Published date: October 24, 2013

Citation: Szmigielska A, Paradowski PT (2013) Assessment of Selection Criteria for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Health Care Current Reviews 1:107. doi:10.4172/hccr.1000107

Copyright: © 2013 Szmigielska A, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Abstract Aim: To assess the need and advisability of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Methods: We assessed 85 subjects with a mean age of 28 years (SD 10, range 15-57) who had been assigned to ACLR at the Regional Orthopedic Center in Lodz, Poland. All subjects completed a questionnaire covering sport activity, injury mechanism, experience of knee stability, a way they were assigned for ACLR and expectations of surgery. Preoperative assessment of the knee was made with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Satisfactory preoperative clinical knee outcome was defined as the lower threshold for the 95% CI of 18–34-yearold males and corresponded to the KOOS score above 90 for Pain, 84 for Symptoms, 91 for ADL, 80 for Sports/ Recreation, and 81 for QOL. The activity level was determined with the Tegner activity scale. We considered subjects to be eligible for the operation if they fulfilled the newly established criteria: 1) pre-injury activity level ≥ 7 according to Tegner, depending on sport discipline performed, and a will to return to professional sport activity following ACLR and/ or 2) residual knee instability regardless of six-weeks structured exercise program and 3) pre-injury activity level ≥ 4 according to Tegner and/or knee instability regardless of structured exercise program in adolescents. Results: New criteria for ACLR were fulfilled by 44% of the study group. Part of the subjects had satisfactory preoperative clinical knee outcome in the KOOS subscales for Pain, Symptoms and ADL. Subjects scored significantly higher in the KOOS subscales Pain, and KOOS ADL (mean 73 and 79 points respectively) than in the KOOS subscales Sports/Recreation and Quality of Life (mean 47 and 38 points, respectively (P ≤ 0.001). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that more than a half of subjects who are eligible for ACLR according to our inclusion’s criteria could be operated on in vain. Patient’s education, adequate assessment of clinical symptoms, ability to perform activities of daily living and a proper rehabilitation program could decrease the number of subjects assigned to ACLR.

Share This Page

Additional Info

Loading
Loading Please wait..
 
Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords