Cancer Survivor Rehabilitation Program: Preliminary Results
- *Corresponding Author:
- Tim Burnham
Central Washington University, Department of Nutrition
Exercise, and Health Sciences, 400 East University Way
Ellensburg, WA 98926-7572, USA
Tel: (509) 963-1764, (509) 860-1717
Fax: (509) 963-1848
E-mail: [email protected]
Received Date: March 13, 2014; Accepted Date: April 24, 2014; Published Date: April 26, 2014
Citation: Burnham T, Peters J, Conner H, Kemble K, Acquisto LD (2014) Cancer Survivor Rehabilitation Program: Preliminary Results . Int J Phys Med Rehabil 2:194. doi: 10.4172/2329-9096.1000194
Copyright: © 2014 Burnham T, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. author and source are credited.
Abstract Cancer survivors in the U.S. now total over 12 million. The symptoms remaining posttreatment may lead to a decrease in quality of life. Often patients are left without guidance to rehabilitate themselves back to prior physical, emotional and psychosocial status. Rehabilitation for patients with cancer should be no different from rehabilitation for other diagnostic conditions, including both educational and functional components. Purpose: To measure the effectiveness of a cancer survivor rehabilitation program. Methods: Thirty post-treatment cancer survivors, (26 breast, 3 colon, 1 lung, 2 men, 28 women, 35-77 years) were subjects in a one group pre-post quasi-experimental design. The program consisted of two, 90 minute sessions per week for 12 weeks. Each meeting was divided into 3 sections: an educational activity, cardiovascular training, and a strength and flexibility session. The dependent measures included: aerobic capacity, body fat %, lower body flexibility, handgrip strength, quality of life, Schwartz fatigue scale, and the LASA scale (fatigue, anxiety, confusion, depression, energy and anger). A paired t-test was used to analyze pre-post measures. Results: Aerobic capacity increased 20%, body fat decreased by 1.6 %, lower body flexibility improved 13.7%, and handgrip strength increased 11.3%. Quality of life increased 12.2%. Fatigue measured by the Schwartz scale decreased 28%, LASA scale results: fatigue decreased 50.3%, and depression decreased 63%, confusion decreased 55%, energy increased 47.8%, and anger decreased 62.2%. Anxiety decreased 27.5% but was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This program gave the participants the tools to change their lifestyles for the better. They developed a fundamental knowledge of the physiological and psychological changes that can occur with lifestyle choices and they had a support system with other participants. This combination of tools acquired in the cancer rehabilitation program proved effective at reducing symptoms often seen in post-treatment cancer survivors and improving overall quality of life.