alexa Cell Disruption and Pressurized Liquid Extraction of Carotenoids from Microalgae | OMICS International| Abstract

ISSN: 2157-7544

Journal of Thermodynamics & Catalysis

  • Research Article   
  • J Thermodyn Catal 2016, Vol 7(1): 158
  • DOI: 10.4172/2157-7544.1000158

Cell Disruption and Pressurized Liquid Extraction of Carotenoids from Microalgae

Josef Taucher*, Sascha Baer, Philipp Schwerna, Dominik Hofmann, Magdalena Hümmer, Rainer Buchholz and Anna Becker
Institute of Bioprocess Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
*Corresponding Author : Josef Taucher, Institute of Bioprocess Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany, Tel: +4991318523056, Email: [email protected]

Received Date: Jan 02, 2016 / Accepted Date: Jan 12, 2016 / Published Date: Jan 20, 2016


Microalgae are very promising organisms for the production of high-value compounds such as carotenoids. Nevertheless, their commercial use is so far hampered by the lack of efficient processes and currently feasible for very few strains. One of the most relevant factors is the high effort for downstream processing, e.g., cell disruption and extraction. Thus, the presented studies were dedicated to investigate and optimize these two steps for carotenoid production with microalgae. Six different cell disruption techniques (high pressure homogenizer, ball mill, Ultra Turrax, repeated freeze and thaw, freeze-drying, ultra-sonication) were compared in lab scale for three species: Haemotococcus pluvialis, Chromochloris zofingiensis and Chlorella sorokiniana. The carotenoid recovery was determined via HPLC-UV/Vis after pressurized solvent extraction. Furthermore, factors influencing the applied extraction methods such as solvent, temperature, duration and number of cycles were optimized in order to reach highest recovery rates. While rough mechanical methods such as ball mill and high pressure homogenizer showed the highest effectivity for cell disruption of all three investigated strains, the influence of non-mechanical methods - i.e., repeated freeze and thaw cycles - on the efficiency of the extraction of astaxanthin, lutein and β carotene increased reversely proportional to cell size and cell wall rigidity. For H. pluvialis repeated freezing and thawing resulted in a factor 240 times lower extraction yield compared to high pressure homogenizer, while both methods were comparable for C. sorokiniana. From six tested solvents, dichloromethane resulted in the highest carotene recovery yield, three times higher in comparison to n-hexane. Variation of the extraction temperature from room temperature to 120°C showed an optimum at 60°C. Nearly complete extraction was reached after one cycle of 10 minutes. The data presented here demonstrate the necessity of lab scale optimization of cell disruption and extraction process for future upscaling

Keywords: H. pluvialis; C. sorokiniana; C. zofingiensis; Carotenoids; Cell disruption; Pressurized liquid extraction; HPLC

Citation: Taucher J, Baer S, Schwerna P, Hofmann D, Hümmer M, et al. (2016) Cell Disruption and Pressurized Liquid Extraction of Carotenoids from Microalgae. J Thermodyn Catal 7:158. Doi: 10.4172/2157-7544.1000158

Copyright: © 2016 Taucher J, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Post Your Comment
Share This Article
Relevant Topics
Recommended Conferences
Article Usage
  • Total views: 9121
  • [From(publication date): 3-2016 - Jun 24, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views: 8795
  • PDF downloads: 326
Leave Your Message 24x7