Comparing the Use of a Needle Guidance Device vs. Free-hand Technique in Performing Ultrasound-guided TAP Blocks: A Prospective Randomised TrialKim C1, Ratnayake M2, Lethbridge G1 and Ng I1*
- *Corresponding Author:
- Irene Ng
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Grattan St. Parkville, VIC, Australia
Tel: +61 3 9342 7540
E-mail: [email protected]
Received date: May 06, 2014; Accepted date: August 02, 2014; Published date: August 12, 2014
Citation: Kim C, Ratnayake M, Lethbridge G, Ng I (2014) Comparing the Use of a Needle Guidance Device vs. Free-hand Technique in Performing Ultrasound- Guided TAP Blocks: A Prospective Randomised Trial. J Anesth Clin Res 5:429. doi: 10.4172/2155-6148.1000429
Copyright: 2014 Kim C, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
We compared the use of InfinityTM needle guide vs. free hand technique in performing ultrasound-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) blocks in a clinical setting. Twenty patients having open abdominal surgery were recruited. The needle tip visibility was better with the use of needle guide than without, as demonstrated by the increased median (IQR) percentage of the time the needle tip was visualised: 34.2% (15.0-55.1) vs. 17.9% (8.2- 28.3), p<0.05. The total procedure time was less with the use of needle guide: 107.9s (76.6-120.2) vs. 123.8s (96.5- 165.9), p<0.05. The proceduralist satisfaction (score 0-10) was higher with the use of needle guide 8.0 (5.3-8.8) vs. 5.5 (4.0-7.8), p<0.05.The use of needle guide improved the percentage of needle tip visibility, time to perform the block and proceduralist satisfaction when performing ultrasound-guided TAP block.