Comparison of Long-Term Outcome after Endovascular Therapy versus Bypass Surgery for Superficial Femoral Artery Disease
Yanase Y*, Fukada J and Tamiya Y
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Otaru General Hospital, Japan
- *Corresponding Author:
- Yanase Y
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Otaru General Hospital
Wakamatsu 1-1-1, Otaru, Hokkaido 047-8550, Japan
E-mail: [email protected]
Received date: June 02, 2016; Accepted date: June 08, 2016; Published date: June 16, 2016
Citation: Yanase Y, Fukada J, Tamiya Y (2016) Comparison of Long-Term Outcome after Endovascular Therapy versus Bypass Surgery for Superficial Femoral Artery Disease. J Vasc Med Surg 4: 270. doi:10.4172/2329-6925.1000270
Copyright: © 2016 Yanase Y, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Background: Recent advances in endovascular therapy (EVT) have increased its utility in the management of peripheral artery disease. We assessed long-term outcomes after EVT versus bypass surgery for superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions.
Methods: Revascularization procedures for SFA lesions were performed in 107 limbs (52 limbs undergoing bypass surgery and 55 limbs undergoing EVT) at our facility between January 2007 and December 2015.
Results: The average period of postoperative monitoring was 41.9 months and 31.1 months in the bypass and EVT groups, respectively. Risk factors were similar when comparing the two groups. In the bypass group, TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II type C/D lesions were present 47 limbs (90.4%). In the EVT group, type A/B lesions were present in 54.2 limbs (98.2%). The primary patency rates at 1 and 5 years were 84.1% and 62.8%, respectively, in the bypass group and were 68.0% and 49.7%, respectively, in the EVT group (p=0.127). The secondary patency rates did not significantly differ between the two groups, either.
Conclusion: There was no statistical significance between the bypass and the EVT groups with regard to longterm patency. In both groups, revision was sometimes required, so postoperative care is important.