alexa Comparison of the ProsealTM Laryngeal Mask with or without a 90 Degree Bent by an Intubating Stylet for Airway Management during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Simulation
ISSN: 2155-6148

Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research
Open Access

Like us on:
OMICS International organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations

700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Research Article

Comparison of the ProsealTM Laryngeal Mask with or without a 90 Degree Bent by an Intubating Stylet for Airway Management during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Simulation

Nobuyasu Komasawa1*, Ryusuke Ueki2 , Hanako Kohama3 , Shin-ichi Nishi3 , Chikara Tashiro2 and Yoshiroh Kaminoh4

1Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka Medical College, Japan

2Department of Anesthesiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Japan

3Intensive Care Unit, Hyogo College of Medicine, Japan

4Department of Surgical Center, Hyogo College of Medicine, Japan

*Corresponding Author:
Nobuyasu Komasawa
Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka Medical College
Daigaku-machi 2-7, Takatsuki,Osaka 569-8686, Japan
Tel: +81-72-683-2368
Fax: +81-72-684-6552
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: June 28, 2013; Accepted date: July 26, 2013; Published date: July 29, 2013

Citation: Komasawa N, Ueki R, Kohama H, Nishi Si, Tashiro C, et al. (2013) Comparison of the Proseal™ Laryngeal Mask with or without a 90 Degree Bent by an Intubating Stylet for Airway Management during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Simulation. J Anesthe Clinic Res 4:336. doi: 10.4172/2155-6148.1000336

Copyright: © 2013 Komasawa N, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

 

Abstract

Purpose: The 2010 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines propose the use of a Laryngeal Mask (LMA) as an alternative to tracheal intubation for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). Use of a ProSealTM laryngeal mask, bent 90 degrees by an intubating stylet, has been reported to yield definite insertion. We compared speed and success of insertion between the styleted LMA (ProSeal-90D) and the conventional LMA (ProSeal-N).

Methods: A total of 20 novice doctors in our Department of Anesthesia performed insertion of both the ProSeal-N and ProSeal-90D on a manikin, with and without chest compression. Insertion times and successful insertion rate with first attempt were recorded.

Results: Chest compression decreased the ventilation success rate significantly for the ProSeal-N, but did not affect the results for the ProSeal-90D. Moreover, when chest compression was performed, ventilation success rate was significantly higher for ProSeal-90D than the ProSeal-N. Insertion time was lengthened by chest compression for ProSeal-N, but not for ProSeal-90D.

Conclusions: In simulated resuscitation, rapid successful placement was more frequent with the ProSeal-90D than the ProSeal-N during chest compressions.

Share This Page

Additional Info

Loading
Loading Please wait..
 
Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords