Computerized vs. Paper-Pencil Assessment of Cognitive Change following Acute Ischemic Stroke
- *Corresponding Author:
- Robert Jr. Laforce
Clinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire
CHU de Québec-Université Laval, 1401, 18e rue
E-mail: [email protected]
Received Date: November 10, 2016; Accepted Date: November 26, 2016; Published Date: November 28, 2016
Citation: Gagnon MM, Laforce JR (2016) Computerized vs. Paper-Pencil Assessment of Cognitive Change following Acute Ischemic Stroke. J Neurol Disord 4:317. doi: 10.4172/2329-6895.1000317
Copyright: © 2016 Laforce RJ, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Objective: To determine the validity of computerized cognitive testing in an adult population with acute ischemic stroke.
Design: Validation study comparing computerized vs paper-pencil assessments at two time points three months apart in a stroke unit.
Main outcome: Correlation analyses between computerized (using CogState Brief Battery) and paper-pencil testing (using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment) both at study entry and follow-up visits.
Results: We found moderate to strong significant correlations between the two instruments at study entry and follow-up sessions. Executive dysfunctions were the main cognitive changes. Test-retest correlations were strong.
Conclusion and Relevance: The CogState Brief Battery is a valid alternative for clinicians who wish to measure cognitive skills following acute ischemic stroke. Limitations of computerized testing are discussed.