alexa Defining Controlled Substances Overdose: Should Deaths
ISSN: 2161-0495

Journal of Clinical Toxicology
Open Access

Like us on:
OMICS International organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations

700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Research Article

Defining Controlled Substances Overdose: Should Deaths from Substance Use Disorders and Pharmaceutical Adverse Events be included?

Nabarun Dasgupta1*, Scott Proescholdbell2, Catherine Sanford3, Michele Jonsson Funk1, Carri Casteel1,3, Kurt M Ribisl4 and Steve Marshall1,3

1Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA

2Injury and Violence Prevention Branch, North Carolina Division of Public Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA

3Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA

4Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Nabarun Dasgupta
Department of Epidemiology
Gillings School of Global Public Health
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: February 26, 2013; Accepted date: June 04, 2013; Published date: June 06, 2013

Citation: Dasgupta N, Proescholdbell S, Sanford C, Funk MJ, Casteel C, et al. (2013) Defining Controlled Substances Overdose: Should Deaths from Substance use Disorders and Pharmaceutical Adverse Events be included? J Clin Toxicol 3:164. doi:10.4172/2161-0495.1000164

Copyright: © 2013 Dasgupta N, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

 

Abstract

Background: The rate of mortality attributable to drug poisoning has risen consistently since the 1990s. State-based vital statistics registries estimate the incidence of drug overdose deaths using International Classification of Disease 10th revision (ICD-10) codes. Composite ICD-10-based definitions of “overdose” may include deaths that do not involve controlled substances while missing deaths that do. This has implications for incidence estimates, funding priorities, and intervention evaluation. Methods: We evaluated the impact of including substance use disorders and pharmaceutical adverse events codes in definitions of overdose. Seven proposed ICD-10-based definitions, including ones from the Injury Surveillance Workgroup (ISW) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), were applied to North Carolina mortality data from 2008 through 2011. We examined whether overdose deaths varied among definitions. Results: Approximately 1.5% of all deaths among NC residents were due to overdose. Prescription opioids were involved in 63.4% of drug overdose deaths. The estimated number of overdose deaths ranged from 734 to 1,202 per year depending on which definition was used. Of deaths identified using the CDC definition, between 6.4% and 16.1% were pharmaceutical adverse events that showed no evidence of controlled substance involvement. However, there were 12 additional deaths per year that appeared to be overdoses involving controlled substances that were not identified. We propose a definition that includes 28 deaths from substance use disorders, but removes 88 deaths from adverse events, resulting in 1,149 deaths per year on average from overdoses involving controlled substances. Conclusions: Quantifying mortality from drug overdose depends on close cooperation of diverse health professionals. State health department injury control officials should carefully choose which ICD-10 codes are most relevant for their data. Researchers evaluating interventions to prevent overdoses from controlled substances may obtain a more accurate measure of effect by separating pharmaceutical adverse events from non-controlled medicines.

Share This Page

Additional Info

Loading
Loading Please wait..
 
Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords