alexa
Reach Us +44-1753390542
Differences in Happiness-Increasing Strategies Between and Within Affective Profiles | OMICS International | Abstract
ISSN: 2471-2701

Clinical and Experimental Psychology
Open Access

Like us on:

OMICS International organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Research Article

Differences in Happiness-Increasing Strategies Between and Within Affective Profiles

Danilo Garcia1-5*, Erica Schütz3,6, Shane MacDonald3 and Trevor Archer2,3

1Blekinge Centre of Competence, Blekinge County Council, Karlskrona, Sweden

2Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

3Network for Empowerment and Well-Being, Sweden

4Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

5Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

6Department of Psychology, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden

*Corresponding Author:
Garcia D
Network for Empowerment and Well-Being
Axel W. Anderssons Väg 8A, SE 371 62
Lyckeby, Sweden
Tel: +46 31 7864694
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: August 16, 2016; Accepted date: August 29, 2016; Published date: September 05, 2016

Citation: Garcia D, Schütz E, MacDonald S, Archer T (2016) Differences in Happiness- Increasing Strategies Between and Within Affective Profiles. Clin Exp Psychol 2: 139. doi: 10.4172/2471-2701.1000139

Copyright: © 2016 Garcia D, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Background: In a recent study, Schütz and colleagues [1] used the affective profile model (i.e., the combination of peoples’ experience of high/low positive/negative affect) to investigate individual differences in intentional happiness-increasing strategies. Here we used a merged larger sample, a person-centered method to create the profiles, and a recent factor validated happiness-increasing strategies scale, to replicate the original findings. Method: The participants were 1,000 (404 males, 596 females) individuals recruited through Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk) who answered to the Positive Affect Negative Affect Schedule and the Happiness-Increasing Strategies Scales. Participants were clustered in the four affective profiles using the software RopStat (https://www. ropstat.com). Analyses of variance were conducted to discern differences in how frequently the strategies were used among people with different profiles. Results: Individuals with profiles at the extremes of the model (e.g., self-fulfilling vs. self-destructive) differed the most in their use of strategies. The differences within individuals with profiles that diverge in one affectivity dimension while being similar in the other suggested that, for example, decreases in negative affect while positive affect is low (self-destructive vs. low affective) will lead or might be a function of a decrease in usage of both the mental control and the passive leisure strategies. Conclusion: The self-fulfilling experience, depicted as high positive affect and low negative affect, is a combination of agentic (instrumental goal pursuit, active leisure, direct attempts), communal (social affiliation), and spiritual (religion) strategies. Nevertheless, the affective system showed the characteristics of a complex dynamic adaptive system: the same strategies might lead to different profiles (multi-finality) and different strategies might lead to the same profile (equifinality).

Keywords

Top