alexa Evaluation of Three External Marking Methods of Farmed
ISSN: 2155-9546

Journal of Aquaculture Research & Development
Open Access

Like us on:
OMICS International organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations

700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Research Article

Evaluation of Three External Marking Methods of Farmed Atlantic Salmon for the Future Use of Differentiating it From Wild Atlantic Salmon

Atle Mortensen, Oyvind J Hansen and Velmurugu Puvanendran*

Nofima AS, Muninbakken 9-13, 9291 Tromsø, Norway

*Corresponding Author:
Velmurugu Puvanendran
Nofima AS, Muninbakken 9-13
9291 Tromsø, Norway
Tel: +47 77629216
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: June 03, 2016; Accepted Date: October 24, 2016; Published Date: October 26, 2016

Citation: Mortensen A, Hansen OJ, Puvanendran V (2016) Evaluation of Three External Marking Methods of Farmed Atlantic Salmon for the Future Use of Differentiating it From Wild Atlantic Salmon. J Aquac Res Development 7:451. doi: 10.4172/2155-9546.1000451

Copyright: © 2016 Mortensen A, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

 

Abstract

We evaluated different external marking methods for farmed salmon to differentiate it from wild salmon without any special tools. Three marking methods were tested: 1) Adipose fin (AF) removal, 2) Freeze branding (FB) and, 3) Visible Implant Elastomer (VIE). Location of the marking method on the fish, combination of marking methods and degree of AF removal were tested in three experiments. Atlantic salmon parr weighing 20 g were marked either with individual marks or in combination of two. Further all the fish were also PIT tagged. They were kept in freshwater tanks for 4 months and later after smoltification, smolts were transferred to sea cages and kept for another 4 months. At the end of four (freshwater phase) and ten (sea cages) months, growth, survival and mark retention were recorded. All these methods had no significant effects on growth and survival compared to the control (no mark but only PIT tagged). Our results showed that of these methods, only complete removal of the adipose fin met the requirements for mark retention and was the cheapest and easiest method to automate. However, a larger commercial scale long-term testing of the AF clipping is required prior to implementing it. Further development of an automated fin clipping in combination with vaccination and an open discussion with consumers, buyers, and environmental groups are also warranted.

Keywords

Share This Page

Additional Info

Loading
Loading Please wait..
 
Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords