Evolving Myocardial Revascularization: Strategies, Outcomes, Evidence
*Corresponding Author: Katie J. Sheehan, Department of Internal Medicine, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Nepal, Email: sheehan.kt@gmail.comReceived Date: May 01, 2025 / Published Date: May 29, 2025
Citation: Sheehan KJ (2025) Evolving Myocardial Revascularization: Strategies, Outcomes, Evidence. J Card Pulm Rehabi 09: 323
Copyright: © 2025 Katie J. Sheehan This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Research in myocardial revascularization continuously compares PCI and CABG for various conditions, including stable angina and multivessel disease, even in complex patient subgroups like those with left ventricular dysfunction or diabetes. Studies also investigate complete versus incomplete revascularization, hybrid strategies, and Fractional Flow Reserve-guided approaches. The evidence assesses long-term outcomes, patient selection, and management in critical scenarios such as acute coronary syndromes and cardiogenic shock. These efforts aim to optimize revascularization strategies, ensuring effective and safe interventions for diverse coronary artery disease presentations.

Spanish
Chinese
Russian
German
French
Japanese
Portuguese
Hindi 
