Legitimacy and Theory of Political Consciousness: Evaluating Political Act of AggressionMehdi Shokri*
Department of Politics and Philosophy, Free University of Berlin, Germany
- *Corresponding Author:
- Mehdi Shokri, PhD
Department of Politics and Philosophy
Free University of Berlin, Germany
Tel: +49 30 8381
E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Received Date: January 08, 2016; Accepted Date: January 25, 2016; Published Date: February 05, 2016
Citation: Shokri M (2016) Legitimacy and Theory of Political Consciousness: Evaluating Political Act of Aggression. J Pol Sci Pub Aff 4:191. doi:10.4172/2332-0761.1000191
Copyright: © 2016 Shokri M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Political act of aggression has been growing especially in Middle-Eastern countries. Psychology has always been presented the dominant explanation for acts of aggression, yet, seeing the analysis of different regimes, it has not addressed political aggression. This paper is an attempt to explain coercion and political act of aggression. It is designed as an interdisciplinary study of politics, psychology and philosophy, uses rational-normative principles to conduct a behavioral-political analysis of acts of aggression based on the disciplinarily grounds in philosophical reasoning and is of explanatory nature. It is accompanied by the new terminologies: an Anxiety-Aggression-Hypothesis and a Theory of Political Consciousness. Moreover, these two new concepts will be assessed with rational-normative principles and moral significance to demonstrate the validity of three dimensions of legitimized political powers and political acts. Later, political anxiety will be introduced as one of the factors that can be affected by the level of political consciousness and level of rational-normative principles in a power relation or in an act,that consequently shows one of the origins of state’s coercion, the illegitimate act of aggression.