Schäfer H Hendrik , Filser Ludwig, Rohr Ulrich P, Laubender Ruediger P, Dieterle Thomas, Maitland Roger and Zaugg Christian E
Study background: While the strategic advantage of Medical Value (MV) products is widely accepted in developed markets, it remains unclear if varying societal wealth influences the perception of customers on MV products.
Methods: 231 of 240 Internal Medicine physicians from 8 countries participated in a survey with 5 multiple choice questions on MV. Responses from countries have been allocated to income levels according to world-bank data. Three groups have been defined (high-income countries: Canada, Norway and Switzerland=developed markets, upper-mid income markets: Argentina, China, Mexico and Turkey, lower-mid income counties: India=emerging markets). Answers have been statistically analyzed in subgroups (emerging markets vs. developed markets).
Results: The majority of physicians believed that reliable and clinically validated treatment algorithms should accompany a product qualifying for MV. Algorithms should be created, predominantly for existing markers. Emphasis has been given to the discovery of better markers for well-known diseases in developed markets. Physicians` answers on pivotal factors for MV products yielded highest emphasis for generalizability (global technical standardization and data comparability). Technical excellence was given lower priority in developed markets comparing to emerging markets. Cost control was emphasized mainly in high-income markets.
Conclusion: Both developed and emerging markets demand more clinical trials to establish algorithms for diagnostic tests. The prove of clinical utility is a pivotal factor for sustainable business success.
PDFShare this article
Entrepreneurship & Organization Management received 1115 citations as per Google Scholar report
