alexa Microalgae Harvesting Methods for Industrial Production of Biodiesel: Critical Review and Comparative Analysis
ISSN: 2090-4541

Journal of Fundamentals of Renewable Energy and Applications
Open Access

OMICS International organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations

700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Review Article

Microalgae Harvesting Methods for Industrial Production of Biodiesel: Critical Review and Comparative Analysis

Mariam Al hattab1, Abdel Ghaly1* and Amal Hammoud1,2

1Department of Process Engineering and Applied Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

2Food Technology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt

Corresponding Author:
Ghaly A, Professor
Department of Process Engineering
and Applied Sciences, Dalhousie University
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Tel: (902) 494-6014
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: February 02, 2015; Accepted date: February 17, 2015; Published date: February 27, 2015

Citation: Al hattab M, Ghaly A, Hammoud A (2015) Microalgae Harvesting Methods for Industrial Production of Biodiesel: Critical Review and Comparative Analysis. J Fundam Renewable Energy Appl 5:154. doi:10.4172/2090-4541.1000154

Copyright: © 2015 Al hattab M, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Microalgae biomass can be used to produce numerous value added products such as biodiesel, bioethanol, biogas and bio hydrogen, fish feed, animal feed, human food supplements and skin care products. Production of value added products from microalgae biomass requires growing and recovery of the algae biomass and extraction and downstream processing of the desired product. However, the major obstacle for using microalgae biomass on an industrial-scale for the production of biodiesel and other value added products is the dewatering step which accounts for 20-30% of the total costs associated with microalgae production and processing. The aim of this study was to review the current methods used for harvesting and concentrating microalgae and to perform a comparative analysis in order to determine the most efficient and economically viable dewatering methods for large scale processing of microalgae biomass. The harvesting techniques investigated included sedimentation, vacuum filtration, pressure filtration, cross flow filtration, disc stack centrifugation, decanter centrifuge, dispersed air floatation, dissolved air flotation, fluidic oscillation, inorganic flocculation, organic flocculation, auto-flocculation, bio-flocculation electrolytic coagulation, electrolytic flocculation and electrolytic floatation. Eight criteria were used for evaluation of these microalgae harvesting techniques: (a) dewatering efficiency (b) cost (c) toxicity (d) suitability for industrial scale (e) time (f) species specificity (g) reusability of media and (h) maintenance. Each criterion was assigned a score between 7 and 15 based on its degree of importance. Higher values were given to the criteria that were deemed most important for development of an efficient and economic large scale dewatering method for microalgae whereas lower values were given to criteria that were deemed necessary for determining a suitable method but were considered less important. The results indicated that of the 16 methods evaluated, 4 scored values of 80/100 and above and were deemed suitable for harvesting microalgae on an industrial scale. Three were physical techniques (disc stack centrifuge (87/100), cross flow filtration (84/100), decanter centrifugation (82/100)) and the forth was the organic flocculation (80) method. These techniques were deemed suitable for large scale use because of their effectiveness, low operational costs, suitability for numerous species, rapidness, minimal maintenance requirement and being environmentally friendly. The other methods were deemed unsuitable because they are not effective in dewatering a wide array of microalgae species, not suited for large volumes, costly and require high maintenance. Although each of the optimum techniques was deemed suitable for harvesting of microalgae on its merit, a combination of methods can also be used to enhance the recovery efficiency and improve the economics. The use of organic flocculation as an initial harvesting step to concentrate the algae suspension and the centrifugation (or filtration) as a secondary dewatering step will reduce the time and costs associated with dewatering. Flocculation allows for effective removal of algae from large amounts of liquid media and as such the costs associated with energy intensive centrifugation and filtration techniques (used individually) can be reduced by using them as secondary techniques since less volumes of microalgae suspension will undergo the secondary treatment.

Keywords

Share This Page

Additional Info

Loading
Loading Please wait..
 
Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords