alexa Partisan Differences in Spending Preferences after theN
ISSN: 2332-0761

Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs
Open Access

OMICS International organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations

700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Research Article

Partisan Differences in Spending Preferences after theNew Democrat and New Labour Transformations of Party Images

David Lowery*, Marsha de Jong, Carola J A van Eijk and Sandra Taal

Institute of Public Administration, Pieter de la Court building, AK Leiden, The Netherlands

*Corresponding Author:
David Lowery
Institute of Public Administration
Pieter de la Court building
AK Leiden, Netherlands
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: January 18, 2013; Accepted Date: April 19, 2013; Published Date: May 04, 2013

Citation: Lowery D, de Jong M, van Eijk CJA, Taal S (2013) Partisan Differences in Spending Preferences after theNew Democrat and New Labour Transformations of Party Images. J Pol Sci Pub Aff 1:102. doi: 10.4172/2332-0761.1000102

Copyright: © 2013 Lowery D, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

 

Abstract

In this paper we wonder whether the efforts of the New Democrats and New Labour to alter their parties’ images with respect to public spending mute the differences (or lack thereof) in their supporters’ preferences for public spending between their respective major parties as observed by Lewis [1] in the UK case and Lowery and Sigelman [2] in the US case. We address this question by constructing matching UK and US data on aggregate public opinion on public spending at four points since 1980, treating the Clinton New Democrat and the Blair New Labour transformations as interventions that might be expected to alter the preferences of partisans for public spending. We find support for the thermostatic model of preferences for spending [3,4] a result that raises questions about the power of party elites to shape the preferences of their supporters in the battle over the size of government.

Keywords

Share This Page

Additional Info

Loading
Loading Please wait..
 
Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords