alexa Perceptions of in the Watergate Hearings
ISSN: 2332-0761

Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs
Open Access

OMICS International organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations

700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Research Article

Perceptions of in the Watergate Hearings

Powell L*, Hickson M, McCroskey JC and Amsbary J

Department of Communication Studies, University of Alabama, Birmingham, UK

*Corresponding Author:
Larry Powel
Department of Communication
Studies, University of Alabama
Birmingham, UK
(205) 934-3877
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: June 16, 2015; Accepted Date: July 15, 2015; Published Date: July 30, 2015

Citation: Powell L, Hickson M, McCroskey JC, Amsbary J (2015) Perceptions of Authenticity in the Watergate Hearings. J Pol Sci Pub Aff 3:169. doi:10.4172/2332-0761.1000169

Copyright: © 2015 Powell L, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



This study looked at perceptions of authenticity of witnesses testifying during the Watergate hearings held by Congress. The participants were students in basic communication classes at a large state university who viewed two video clips of testimony from the 1973 Congressional Hearings on Watergate. One clip was a recording of John Dean testifying about the illegal activities of those within the White House (testimony later revealed to by honest), and another by John Ehrlichman that disputed the charges by Dean. Participants responded to a questionnaire that measured perceived authenticity, trustworthiness, caring and honesty. The results showed that the testimony of Dean was rated as significantly more authentic than that of Ehrlichman. Authenticity was also correlated with trustworthiness, caring and honesty, but was no synonymous with any of the three.

Share This Page

Additional Info

Loading Please wait..
Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version