Hadeel Zainah, Aarthee Karthikeyan, Pablo Buitron, Douglas Jennings, Suzan L Davis, George Alangaden, Daniela Moreno, Fadi Samaan, Sarah Al Helou, Ghattas Alkoury, Wassim Stephane, Salim Daikh and Mayur Ramesh
Background: The optimal local care of continuous-flow left ventricular-assisted device (CF-LVAD) exit site in unclear. We compared silver-coated wound dressing (Acticoat) with the conventional wound care method. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted at Henry Ford Hospital, a tertiary teaching hospital in urban Detroit, between 11/1/2010 and 12/31/2011. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on Acticoatdressing use. Primary outcome was first CF-LVAD infection rate. Results: Forty-two patients were included in the study. Twenty patients used Acticoat-dressing, while 22 used the control dressing. Mean age was 60.3 ± 8.9 in the intervention group and 48.6 ± 4.8 in the control group (P: 0.004). Male patients were 15 (75%) in the intervention group and 15 (68.2%) in the control group (P: 0.74). Acticoat-dressing was used for a mean duration of 64.1 ± 122.9 days. The rate of first CF-LVAD infection was 15% (3) in the Acticoat group and 31.8% (7) in the control group (P: 0.25). Mortality at 200 days was 15% (3) in the intervention group; and 4.5% (1) in the control group (P: 0.25). Ten patients were infected in the whole study (23.8%); 9 of the infected patients (90%) required hospitalization after the first infection; while 3 patients (30%) required intensive-care unit admission. Mean time to the first infection was 276.3 ± 235.8 days in the intervention group and 276.3 ± 131.5 days in the control group (P: 0.99). Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in the infection rate or time to first infection between the Acticoat group and the control group.
PDFShare this article
Immunochemistry & Immunopathology received 174 citations as per Google Scholar report
