Screening for Distress in Cancer Patients: Performed by Whom?
Ezz El Din M*, Abd El Ghany D and Elkholy E
Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Ain-Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt
- *Corresponding Author:
- Ezz El Din M
Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine
Ain-Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt
E-mail: [email protected]
Received Date: May 17, 2014; Accepted Date: October 28, 2014; Published Date: November 03, 2014
Citation: Ezz El Din M, El Ghany AD, Elkholy E (2015) Screening for Distress in Cancer Patients: Performed by Whom?. J Psychiatry 18:186. doi: 10.4172/Psychiatry.1000186
Copyright: © 2015 Ezz El Din M et al., This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Objective: The study was designed to evaluate the implementation of a screening procedure for distress and supportive care needs to patients who were attending the Clinical Oncology Department, Ain Shams University hospitals. The main aim was to gather descriptive information concerning distress levels and the number and type of difficulties encountered. Methods: The Distress Thermometer (DT) and a problem checklist (translated to Arabic) were administered to 248 recently diagnosed patients who were attending the department. Results: The study was conducted between November 2012 and June 2013, we completed DT sheets from 248 patients. The mean age was 53.8 years and the median value 56 years [range 27-80]. The male to female percentage was similar. The subjects presented three tumor locations: lung, genitourinary and mediastinal. The majority of the patients in our study (154 patients; 62.1%) had to be considered as exhibiting significant distress since they had a DTS equal to 4 or more. The problem list evaluation made it possible to identify the number of problems reported by each patient. In total, 74.2% of the patients reported practical problems, 93.5% physical problems, 29% family problems and 70.9% emotional problems. Religious problems were not reported by any of the patients. Difficulties and limitations were also described. Conclusions: This first clinical experiment conducted in an Egyptian cancer center has provided evidence that a considerable degree of distress is present in patients warranting its routine implementation throughout the disease trajectory and appropriate training of the non-specialist professionals involved.