The Fragmentation and Knowledge in Tourism Fields: An Alternative ViewpointMaximiliano EK*
International Society for Philosophers, Sheffield, United Kindom
- *Corresponding Author:
- Maximiliano EK
International Society for
Philosophers, Sheffield, UK
Tel: +44 (0) 114 2220599
E-mail: [email protected]
Received Date: May 21, 2015 Accepted Date: July 30, 2015 Published Date: August 09, 2015
Citation: Maximiliano EK (2015) The Fragmentation and Knowledge in Tourism Fields: An Alternative Viewpoint. J Tourism Hospit 4:159. doi:10.4172/2167-0269.1000159
Copyright: © 2015 Maximiliano EK. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
The production of knowledge in tourism research has reached a point of maturity over last decades, but serious concerns around its future have arisen. An ever-rising number of scholars believe that the current state of fragmentation not only prevents the formation of a shared-epistemology, but leads to a much broader misunderstanding. This essay review does not represent an attack to any scholar in particular, but a criticism that helps thinking in a new alternative fresh view of tourism-led research. As positivism, researchers are prone to use quantitative methods in their respective fieldwork, precluding that people’s voice exhibits a source of evidence. The problem is that sometimes interviewees lie or simply are not cognizant of their own behaviour. This is the reason why some other methods are necessary. The lack of a clear epistemology paves the ways for tourism not to be considered a serious academic discipline.