The Number of 7 PatientÃ¢ÂÂs Clinical Analysis of Duodenal Neuroendocrine NeoplasmsMohammad Abdul Mazid, Gazi Shahinur Akter, Zheng Hui Ye, Xiao-Ping Geng, Fu-Bao Liu,Yi-Jun Zhao, Fan-Huang,Kun Xie,Hong-Chuan Zhao*
Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui medical University, Anhui Medical University China
- *Corresponding Author:
- Hong-Chuan Zhao
Department of General Surgery
The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui medical University
Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road
Sushan District, Hefei 230032, Anhui, China
E-mail: [email protected]
Received date: March 02, 2017; Accepted date: March 10, 2017; Published date: March 16, 2017
Citation: Mazid MA, Akter GS, Hui Ye Z, Geng XP, Liu FB, et al. The Number of 7 Patient’s Clinical Analysis of Duodenal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Journal of Surgery [Jurnalul de chirurgie]. 2017; 13(1): 41-45 DOI: 10.7438/1584-9341-13-1-8
Copyright: © 2017 Mazid MA, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Aim: The aim of this study was to report and analyze outcomes associated 7 patient’s in-hospital evaluation and investigate of the cliniopathological features diagnosis and treatment of duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms. So provide knowledge for further understanding of this condition. Methods: The number of 7 consecutive patients who underwent duodenal (NEN) of the first affiliated hospital of Anhui medical university of December 2012 to 2015 were identified and included for analysis. Demographic and operative data, pathological findings and post-operative outcomes were entered into a computer database. Prognostic factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: The number of 7 patients 3 cases was male and 4 were female; all cases underwent ultrasound and CT examination, 5 cases had endoscopy examination and 1 case had MRI examination. The imaging examinations showed that the tumor was located at descendant duodenum in 2 cases, at duodenal papilla in 1 case and at horizontal duodenum in 1 case. The endoscopy examination showed that the tumor was located at descendant duodenum in 1 case at duodenal papilla in 1 cases and at duodenal bulb in 1 case The 7 patients exhibited dissimilar clinical symptoms. Duodenal NEN was manifested as abdominal pain in 3 cases as jaundice in 2 cases and as headache and fatigue in 2 cases. All patients received surgical treatment, and their diagnoses were confirmed by postoperative pathological and immune histochemical examinations. Conclusion: Duodenal NEN has low prevalence, insidious onset and usually without specific clinical signs and symptoms. Its diagnosis mainly relies on pathological biopsy and immunohistochemical staining, and surgery is the first option of treatment.