alexa The Pharmacokinetic Properties and Bioequivalence of Me
ISSN: 0975-0851

Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability
Open Access

Like us on:
OMICS International organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations

700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Research Article

The Pharmacokinetic Properties and Bioequivalence of Methyldopa Formulations: Results of an Open-label, Randomized, Two-period, Crossover, Single-dose Study

 

Abstract

Comparative assessment of the pharmacokinetic properties and bioequivalence (BE) of two methyldopa formulations (Methyldopa, 250 mg tablets, R-Pharm CJSC, Russia-investigational medicinal product, and Dopegyt®, 250 mg tablets, EGIS Pharmaceuticals PLC, Hungary-reference product) were investigated in 24 healthy volunteers (13 women and 11 men, caucasian) in an open-label, randomized, crossover, two-period, two-sequence trial with 7-day washout period. A comparative dissolution test was carried out in advance in 3 media, including quantitative determination of methyldopa by UV spectrophotometry. The release patterns of the active ingredient from the test and reference products were equivalent. Methyldopa concentrations in plasma were measured by validated method of high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, using the deuterated internal standard. The validation method yields data meeting all acceptance criteria for the plasma methyldopa concentration range of 0.020-3.000 μg/mL. Stabilization of plasma samples was developed that involved addition of ascorbic acid to the plasma during the sampling procedure at the study site. The BE assessment involved calculation of 90% confidence intervals for AUC, Cmax, and Cmax/AUC using analysis of variance (ANOVA) of log-transformed data within an range of 80.00-125.00%. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two drugs. The point estimates and 90% confidence interval limits were as follows: AUC0-t-92.93% (80.69-107.03%), Cmax-94.89% (80.88-111.34%), Cmax/AUC0-t-102.11% (93.95-110.98%), corresponding to the acceptable ranges (80.00-125.00%). The test and reference drug products are characterized by a high degree of pharmacokinetic similarity and thus are bioequivalent.

Keywords

Share This Page

Additional Info

Loading
Loading Please wait..
 
Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords