alexa Urge For an Independent Judiciary or Just a Game of Thr
ISSN: 2332-0761

Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs
Open Access

OMICS International organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations

700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Perspective Article

Urge For an Independent Judiciary or Just a Game of Thrones: A Jurisprudential and Comparitive Perspective

Ambuj Dixit*

School of Law, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, India

*Corresponding Author:
Ambuj Dixit, B.A LLB
Constitutional Law Hons
School of Law, KIIT University
Bhubaneswar, India
Tel: 0674 272 5440
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: December 01, 2015; Accepted Date: December 20, 2015; Published Date: December 31, 2015

Citation: Dixit A (2015) Urge For an Independent Judiciary or Just a Game of Thrones: A Jurisprudential and Comparitive Perspective. J Pol Sci Pub Aff S2:008. doi:10.4172/2332-0761.S2-008

Copyright: © 2015 Dixit A. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



Now, in a recent development the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has struck down a central law aimed at forming a National Judicial Appointment Commission which was enacted vis. a vis. the Constitution (Ninety-Ninth Amendment) Act, 2014. It may seem like another quotidian judgment delivered by the Hon’ble Court but it actually is the biggest crisis in the working of Indian model of separation of powers till date. It may seem like any other judgment of the Hon’ble court declaring ultra vires a law made by the legislature but in effect it undermines the competence of the legislature and the executive and gives a severe blow to the system of checks and balances as envisaged by our constitution makers. Was the court right in doing so? What were the reasons for which the court was forced to do so? Is the continuous interference in policy making on part of the court viable? Is it hampering the power of other organs of the state or just exercising the power of judicial review? Is it correct jurisprudentially and if not then what needs to be done? These are the sort of questions the author aims to answer by the medium of this present article for which the author has analyzed the situation in hand by using doctrines, case laws and his own opinions. In the end the author will try to suggest some workable solutions so that a system of checks and balances is maintained without hampering the independence of any of the organs of state.


Share This Page

Additional Info

Loading Please wait..
Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version