Reach Us +1-504-608-2390
Pharmacogenomic Testing of Anti-Platelets Drugs and its Cost- Effectiveness | OMICS International
ISSN: 2161-0495
Journal of Clinical Toxicology

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Pharmacogenomic Testing of Anti-Platelets Drugs and its Cost- Effectiveness

Vivian WY Lee*

School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong

*Corresponding Author:
Vivian WY Lee
School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: July 23, 2013; Accepted date: July 24, 2013; Published date: July 26, 2013

Citation: Lee VWY (2013) Pharmacogenomic Testing of Anti-Platelets Drugs and its Cost-Effectiveness. J Clin Toxicol 3:e120. doi: 10.4172/2161-0495.1000e120

Copyright: © 2013 Lee VWY. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Clinical Toxicology


Pharmacogenomic testing; Anti-platelet; Costeffectiveness

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) plays a vital role in the management of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) patients [1]. Intensive dual anti-platelet treatment is necessary in patients received PCI. Anti-platelet agents, including aspirin, thienopyridines, and platelet Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors, have become the foundation of antithrombotic therapy [2]. Recently, observational studies documented the drug-drug interactions between clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) that may lead to undesirable adverse cardiovascular outcomes [3-5]. It was also suggested that H2-receptor antagonist (H2RA) may be considered an alternative; yet its clinical efficacy is yet to be confirmed due to contradicting results from various studies [6,7].

Clopidogrel is a pro-drug that requires hepatic biotransformation by cytochrome P450 3A4 and 2C19 to an active metabolite [8]. Genetic polymorphism of the CYP 2C19 has been documented to have an impact on the metabolism of clopidogrel. Based on the metabolic activity of an individual, most of the population can be categorized as Extensive Metabolizers (EM), Intermediate Metabolizer (IM) or Poor Metabolizers (PM). The two main mutations that are related to the PM phenotype are CYP 2C19*2 and CYP 2C19*3 [9,10]. Genetic polymorphism of CYP 2C19 also demonstrated with interracial differences, approximately 2-5% of Caucasians and 11-23% of Oriental populations representing with the PM phenotype [10]. It has been documented that PMs of CYP 2C19*2 (loss-of-function allele) has a marked decrease in platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel [11,12]. It increased cardiovascular events including death (12.1% [carriers] versus 8.0% [non-carriers], Hazard ratio of 1.53; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.19) and stent thrombosis (2.6% [carriers] versus 0.8% [non-carriers], Hazard ratio, 3.09; 95% CI, 1.19 to 8.00) than non-carriers [13]. Yet, genetic screening is not a usual clinical practice in the management of ACS patients. The situation is more problematic when patients require concurrent use of PPIs for gastrointestinal protection. The incidence of inpatient cardiac-related death was 12% in PM genotypes with concurrent use of PPI and clopidogrel compared to non-PPI users at 5% [11]. In addition, there will be additional expenditure and work force for the genetic screening. It is important to assess the cost-effectiveness of this screening before suggesting routine genetic screening to the real world cardiology practice.

Acute coronary syndrome is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in different countries including Hong Kong [14]. In our previous study, we have documented the average cost of ACS management per patient per year was US$ 10,998 using dual antiplatelet therapy [15]. In Hong Kong, it was shown that 50% of all hospitalizations of peptic ulcer bleeding were related to the use of antiplatelet agent (namely aspirin) or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) [16]. In our previous one-year randomized trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin with PPI in patients with vascular diseases who had a history of peptic ulcer bleeding, we showed that the incidence of recurrent bleeding was significantly lower in the aspirin/PPI group (0.7%) than the clopidogrel group (9%) (16). Our finding was contrary to the recommendations of the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology to use clopidogrel in patients with gastrointestinal problems [17]. In our previous study, we observed that there was 45%, 41% and 14% of Hong Kong Chinese with the EM, IM, and PM phenotypes respectively [18]. The prevalence of PM phenotype was higher than Caucasian population. Therefore, Chinese ACS patients with PM genotype on clopidogrel may have unsatisfactory clinical outcomes including Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) such as Myocardial Infarction (MI), target lesion revascularizations, or death. We have conducted a cost of acute MI study in Hong Kong. The economic impact of MACE is vast and significant since our results showed that the yearly cost of acute MI management for each patient was US$ 9,383 [19].

To date, there are newer antiplatelet agents including prasugrel and ticagrelor that are not genetic dependent as compared with clopidogrel. However, the costs of these newer agents are more expensive given the availability of generic clopidogrel. It has been shown that genotypeguided antiplatelet therapy in ACS patients may be cost-effective when comparing a simulated cohort of ACS patients using either clopidogrel or prasugrel [20]. It is unknown how these newer agents impact on the clinical practice along with routine pharmacogenomics screening since most of the published articles are based on simulation rather than the real-world findings. Recently, the working group of the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) reviewed three areas where pharamcogenomic applications can be applied. These 3 areas are anticoagulants, anti-platelet agents and lipid lowering agents [21]. The NHLBI noted the clinical challenges and clinical needs for cardiovascular pharmacogenomics. The gold standard to validate cardiovascular pharmacogenomics must include findings from the prospective randomized controlled trials. However, the prospective clinical trials are not possible with sustainable financial and institutional support. In addition, there is a great demand for experts in health technology assessment (HTA) and health policy for the validation of cost-effectiveness in cardiology pharmacogenomics including antiplatelet agents. The impact of HTA on health policy can be country specific and may be influenced by various clinical, political, financial and cultural factors in each country. The established platform in one country may not apply in another country.

In conclusion, pharmacogenomic screening of antiplatelet agents may improve clinical outcomes of ACS patients. However, it is important to establish a sustainable platform to evaluate the long-term clinical and economic impact of the translational pharmacogenomic testing of anti-platelet agents in ACS management.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12012
  • [From(publication date):
    October-2013 - Dec 11, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8232
  • PDF downloads : 3780

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri and Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version