alexa Post Laser-Amelanotic Pattern of Lentigo Maligna: Pitfalls in Diagnosis and Treatment of Pigmented Facial Lesions of Unknown Nature | OMICS International
ISSN: 2155-9554
Journal of Clinical & Experimental Dermatology Research
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Post Laser-Amelanotic Pattern of Lentigo Maligna: Pitfalls in Diagnosis and Treatment of Pigmented Facial Lesions of Unknown Nature

Julie Le Blay1,2, Valérie Costes2, Bernard Guillot1 and Olivier Dereure1*

1University of Montpellier I, Department of Dermatology, Hospital Saint-Eloi, Montpellier, France

2University of Montpellier I, Laboratory of Pathology, Hospital Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier, France

*Corresponding Author:
Dr. Olivier Dereure
Department of Dermatology
University of Montpellier
Hospital Saint-Eloi
Montpellier, France
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: August 29, 2012; Accepted date: October 22, 2012; Published date: October 29, 2012

Citation: Blay JL, Costes V, Guillot B, Dereure O (2012) Post Laser-Amelanotic Pattern of Lentigo Maligna: Pitfalls in Diagnosis and Treatment of Pigmented Facial Lesions of Unknown Nature. J Clin Exp Dermatol Res 3:161. doi:10.4172/2155-9554.1000161

Copyright: © 2012 Blay JL, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Clinical & Experimental Dermatology Research

Diagnostic of pigmented lesions on photo-exposed areas may be difficult and the treatment options should be carefully discussed. We hereby report a case that emphasizes these issues and the hazards of inadequate treatment of facial pigmented lesions of dubious nature.

A 65-year-old caucasian woman was referred for evaluation of a 2 centimeter heterogeneous macule of the left cheek (Figure 1). This lesion had initially presented two years before referral as a reticulated, erythematous and moderately pigmented lesion. No initial histological examination was carried out and the lesion was treated with KTP2 vascular laser for cosmetic reasons, leaving a hypochromic and slightly erythematous macule that slowly enlarged over time. Recently, two pigmented spots had occurred on the superior edge (arrows) of this hypochromic area, resulting in further evaluation of the nature of the lesion. Clinical examination was otherwise unremarkable and there were no enlarged lymph nodes.


Figure 1: Post-laser facial amelanotic macule with secondary peripheral pigmented dots (arrows): lentigo maligna with peripheral extension.

Dermoscopical examination displayed a scarring achromic pattern with few vessels in the central area along with two peripheral areas with light brown fingerprint-like structures with a definite network pattern, corresponding to the two recently appeared pigmented spots. Because of these clinical and dermatoscopic suspicious changes, three biopsies were performed, two on the pigmented areas and one on the central achromic macule. All samples displayed the same histological pattern with a strongly atypical junctional melanocytic proliferation consistent with a Lentigo Maligna (LM). The whole lesion was then surgically removed with a 5 mm margin and the final histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of LM with no dermal infiltration.

This observation strikingly illustrates the pitfalls in evaluating pigmented facial lesions of banal appearance and the hazards of treating such lesions of unknown nature, located on sun-exposed areas, when no initial histological or at least dermoscopical examination has been performed. Indeed, it is very likely that the initial lesion was already a misdiagnosed atypical melanocytic proliferation that should have been surgically removed. Diagnostic of LM can sometimes be clinically difficult, but dermoscopical examination may significantly improve diagnostic accuracy. A combination of 4 features (asymmetric pigmented follicular openings, dark rhomboidal structures, slate-gray dots and slate-gray globules) has indeed been proposed, resulting in an adequate classification of 93% of patients with a specificity of 96% and a sensitivity of 89% [1]. However, multiple and repeated biopsies should be performed if any doubt persists.

In our observation, our patient had been unadequately treated by vascular laser because she had been initially misdiagnosed for a benign lesion with a likely vascular component. This procedure resulted in an achromic evolution of the whole area that made the diagnostic of LM even more difficult. Indeed, clinical suspicion of a genuine melanocytic lesion arose only at second evaluation, due to the occurrence of two new pigmented lesions at the periphery of the secondarily amelanotic LM, related to progressive peripheral extension of this intra-epithelial malignancy.

Laser therapy should not be used in undocumented pigmented lesion, especially on sun-exposed areas, for several reasons. First, no histological examination is possible. Second, superficial destructive therapies such as laser are associated with a high relapse rate [2]. More importantly, as it often results in a dyschromic scar, and this procedure makes post-treatment follow up and secondary diagnosis of the initial lesion more difficult. Surgical excision with a 1 cm margin (5 mm if impossible because of localization) is recommended in LM according to the current guidelines [3]. Histological examination of the entire lesion is the only way to rule out a dermal invasion associated with a less favorable outcome. This frequent misleading decrease of pigmentation after laser procedure is perhaps related to a direct effect of laser light on melanocytes either normal of malignant, with disturbances of melanin synthesis (Figures 2 and 3).


Figure 2: Tumoral lentiginous proliferation extending down the external root sheath of hair follicles.


Figure 3: Strongly expressing melan A.

To conclude, superficial destructive therapies such as laser should be strongly discouraged on facial pigmented lesions of dubious nature since, they may overlook a genuine malignancy. If such a treatment is nonetheless performed, a periodic and prolonged follow up is crucial.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12232
  • [From(publication date):
    December-2012 - Apr 23, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8467
  • PDF downloads : 3765

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version