GET THE APP

A comparative analysis of the engineering of 5 commercially avail | 18753
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Devices

Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Devices
Open Access

ISSN: 2475-7586

+44 1223 790975

A comparative analysis of the engineering of 5 commercially available titanium dental implant surfaces using micro-focus computed tomography


International Conference on Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Engineering

October 16-17, 2017 Osaka, Japan

Andre van Zyl, Michaela Beetge, Jacobus Hoffman, Stephan van Zyl, Vladimir Todorovic, Cor-Jacques Kat and Schalk Kok

University of Pretoria, South Africa

Scientific Tracks Abstracts: J Biomed Eng Med Devic

Abstract :

Introduction & Aim: The engineering of dental implant surfaces has shown tremendous development over the past decade. Bone-to-implant interface is influenced mainly by implant surface topography. The objective was to analyse the exact surface area of different implant diamters of 5 systems using micro-focus cone beam tomography. Methods: 100 implants were scanned at Necsa (South African Nuclear Energy Corporation) which houses the Nikon XTH 225 ST micro-focus CT scanner. The spatial resolution obtained is 1-3 �?¼m instead of 300 �?¼m for CBCT. To obtain a high quality 3D-virtual image at this high spatial resolution, the number of 2D projections increases from 375 to 8000. Analysis was done using VGStudioMAX-3.0 visualization software (Volume Graphics GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). Results: Statistical analysis showed Ankylos had the largest mean implant surface area (151.90 mm2) in the Narrow Platform (NP) group and Neodent the smallest (125.95 mm2). Megagen implants had the largest surface area (227.39 mm2) in the Regular Platform (RP) group and Neodent the smallest (164.25 mm2). Statistically significant differences (P<0.001) were found between systems. Conclusion: NP implants have become important in order to avoid complex bone augmentation procedures. It is therefore important for surgeons to know the exact surface area of NP versus RP implants. The greater the surface area of implants, the less pressure on the surrounding bone, which is of importance from a biomechanical point of view. This is the largest study of its kind using micro-focus CT technology and can be used as a reference for future studies. There is currently no reliable data on total implant surface area.

Biography :

Andre van Zyl has obtained his Postgraduate studies as a Specialist in Oral Medicine and Periodontics from the University of Stellenbosch, Cape Town, South Africa. He is currently the Head of Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine at the University of Pretoria, South Africa. He is also the Chair of the International Team for Implantology Center of Excellence at Pretoria and also Chair of the ITI Scholarship Center.

Top