alexa A Comparison Of Prilocaine 1% Versus 1.5% For Ultrasound-guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block For Hand Surgery
ISSN: 2161-0533

Orthopedic & Muscular System: Current Research
Open Access

Like us on:
OMICS International organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations

700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Share This Page

Additional Info

Loading Please wait..

10th Global Orthopedicians Annual Meeting
July 03-04, 2017 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Van Eeckhout K, Poelaert J, Staelens B, Flamée P and Bhutia J T
UZ Brussels, Belgium
ScientificTracks Abstracts: Orthop Muscular Syst
DOI: 10.4172/2161-0533-C1-032
Objective: The objective of the study was to compare the anesthetic characteristics of prilocaine 1% and 1.5% in terms of onset and offset time of sensorimotor block and methemoglobinemia levels, when used for ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus blocks. Methods: The prospective, randomised, double-blinded trial was conducted at the University Hospital Brussels on 60 patients (ASA I-III, age range 19-86) scheduled for ambulatory hand surgery. The axillary brachial plexus blocks were performed with ultrasound alone with selective injection of 5 ml of 1% prilocaine or 1.5% prilocaine around each nerve (20 ml in total). Onset time and duration of sensory and motor block were assessed, as well as peak methemoglobinemia levels 2 hours after injection. Results: Mean onset time for sensory block in the 1% prilocaine group was 15 min for the median nerve and 12 min for ulnar and musculocutaneous nerve compared to 15 min for the median nerve and 9 min for ulnar and musculocutaneous nerve in the 1.5% group. Mean duration of sensory and motor block was 265 min and 247 min respectively for the 1% group versus 255 min and 245 min for the 1.5% group. The average methemoglobinemia level was 2.25% for the 1% group compared to 3.03% for the 1.5% group. Conclusion: We conclude that there is no statistically significant difference between 1% and 1.5% prilocaine in terms of onset and offset times of the sensorimotor block. However, significantly higher levels of methemoglobinemia were found in 1.5% group.

Van Eeckhout K is an Anesthesiology Resident at University Hospital Brussels, Belgium.


image PDF   |   image HTML
Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version