Reach Us +1-504-608-2390
Comparison Of The Trabecular Meshwork Height Between Open And Closed Angles And Evaluating The Location Of The Scleral Spur In Korean Patients | 96972
ISSN: 2155-9570

Journal of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
Open Access

Like us on:

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Comparison of the trabecular meshwork height between open and closed angles and evaluating the location of the scleral spur in Korean patients

17th Asia Pacific Ophthalmologists Annual Meeting

Wungrak Choi

Yonsei University College of Medicine, South Korea

ScientificTracks Abstracts: J Clin Exp Ophthalmol

DOI: 10.4172/2155-9570-C6-093

Purpose of our study was to analyze the Trabecular Meshwork (TM) height of open and closed angle patients and attempt to present a better way to define the exact location of the scleral spur with the Schwalbe???s line method in the Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT). Our study measured the distance from the scleral spur to the Schwalbe???s line as the TM height and compared it between open and closed angle patients, and with results from previous studies. The mean TM height was then applied to locate the scleral spur with Schwalbe's line method. Of the patients who underwent AS-OCT at the Yonsei University Health System between January 2015 and December 2017, 30 patients (60 eyes) with open angle and 30 patients (60 eyes) with closed angle were randomly enrolled. Mean (SD) TM height was 810 (104) ?m in the open angle group and 580 (107) ?m in the closed angle group which was significantly different. (p<0.001) When the actual TM height was compared using the Schwalbe's line method, the accuracy was significantly better with updated reference distance (open: 810 ?m, closed: 580 ?m) than previously used 1000 ?m reference distance. (P<0.001) TM height was significantly different between open and closed angle patients. As so, the reference distance for Schwalbe???s line method needs to be distinguished according to open and closed angle when it is used for locating the scleral spur. Furthermore, TM height may be an important factor to distinguish open and closed angle.

Wungrak Choi has completed his Graduation from Yonsei University College of Medicine and is pursuing Ophthalmology as a specialty in Seoul Korea.

E-mail: [email protected]