alexa Examining HIV Risk Underestimation In An Urban Population
ISSN 2155-6113

Journal of AIDS & Clinical Research
Open Access

Like us on:
OMICS International organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations

700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Share This Page

Additional Info

Loading Please wait..

2nd International Conference on HIV/AIDS, STDs, & STIs
October 27-29, 2014 Embassy Suites Las Vegas, USA

Helena Kwakwa, Rahab Wahome, Mondy Dorsainvil, Natasha Mvula and Mayla Jackson
Accepted Abstracts: J AIDS Clin Res
DOI: 10.4172/2155-6113.S1.009
Background: HIV risk perception is recognized as potentially impacting HIV risk behavior, testing patterns and acceptance of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We seek to describe the HIV risk perceptions of a population undergoing HIV testing in Philadelphia. Methods: Patients undergoing HIV rapid testing in the city health centers of Philadelphia between July 2007 and December 2013 were administered a brief survey. Data collected included HIV risk behavior(s), patient risk perception, Tester risk estimate and HIV test results. A descriptive analysis using SAS v. 9.3 was performed. Results: During the study period 33,430 individuals underwent HIV rapid testing and participated in the survey. A modest majority (55%) was female and 19.7% were foreign-born. Overall 83.7% perceived their risk to be zero or low. Of those testing positive (0.7%, n=232), 35.7% of females and 26.4% of males perceived their risk as zero (p<0.01), and 35.7% of females and 41.9% of males, as low. Of the 162 who tested positive and perceived their risk as zero or low, the Tester estimated risk was zero for none, low for 41.9%, moderate for 27.2% and high for 30.9%. Patient perceived risk was correlated with previous HIV testing rates, and rates of acceptance of PrEP. Conclusions: In this urban population, patient risk perception of zero or low was overall commonly found. Furthermore, a substantial minority of those testing positive for HIV perceived their risk as zero. The degree of disagreement between the patient perceived risk and the Tester estimated risk, as well as the proportion of HIV-positive patients thinking their risk was zero, suggest prevalent underestimation of risk by patients. The correlates of HIV risk perception such as testing behavior and acceptance of PrEP mandate further study in this area of inquiry.
image PDF   |   image HTML
Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version