alexa Intervertebral Angles Increase Proportionately To Activity Level In Patients With Spinal Instrumentation
ISSN: 2329-9096

International Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Open Access

Like us on:
OMICS International organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations

700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Share This Page

Additional Info

Loading
Loading Please wait..
 

2nd International Conference and Exhibition on Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
July 14-16, 2014 DoubleTree by Hilton Baltimore-BWI Airport, USA

Tatsuya Ishii, Tsuyoshi Matsuo, Rie Akioka, Tomohito Inoue
Posters: Int J Phys Med Rehabil
DOI: 10.4172/2329-9096.S1.007
Abstract
Introduction: Many recent studies report postoperative complications and adjacent intervertebral segments following spinal instrumentation, but few have focused on postoperative patient activity levels. In this study, life-space assessment (LSA) scores and intervertebral angles in patients after spinal instrumentation were investigated. Methods: 19 patients who underwent lateral functional spinal radiography after spinal instrumentation were studied. Each subject?s amount of activity was scored using an LSA, and the patients were divided into Group A (70 points; n = 11) and Group B (70 points; n = 8). Intervertebral angles were measured for the segments superior and inferior to the fused segment with the limbs in the basic, anterior flexed, and posterior flexed positions. A Mann-Whitney U test was used for the statistical comparisons, with values of p0.05 considered significant. Results: In Group A, with the limbs in the basic position, the mean superior and inferior intervertebral angles were 9.9?4.4? and 17.1? 12.4?, respectively. In the anterior flexed position, the mean superior and inferior intervertebral angles were 5.0? 4.6? and 11.4? 9.0?, respectively. In the posterior flexed position, the mean superior and inferior intervertebral angles were 13.2? 5.7? and 21.9? 11.7?, respectively. In Group B, with the limbs in the basic position, the mean superior and inferior intervertebral angles were 5.1? 5.0? and 16.6? 6.2?, respectively. In the anterior flexed position, the mean superior and inferior vertebral angles were 4.6? 4.7? and 10.5? 8.2?, respectively. In the posterior flexed position, the mean superior and inferior vertebral angles were 6.4? 5.0? and 20.9? 6.2?, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between both groups in the superior intervertebral angle with the limbs in the basic and posterior flexed positions. The other values showed no significant differences. Conclusions: The results of previous studies and the current study show that the load on the adjacent vertebrae increases after spinal instrumentation. Patients with a high postoperative activity level require monitoring of and guidance about activities of daily living (ADL), whereas patients with a low postoperative activity level require functional and ADL training.
image PDF   |   image HTML
 

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords