alexa Is Hydrogen Peroxide Production A False Lead In Selecting Vaginal Lactobacilli For Probiotic Development? | 5489
ISSN: 2157-7110

Journal of Food Processing & Technology
Open Access

Like us on:

OMICS International organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Is hydrogen peroxide production a false lead in selecting vaginal Lactobacilli for probiotic development?

International Conference and Exhibition on Probiotics - 2012

Deirdre Elizabeth O?Hanlon

ScientificTracks Abstracts: J Food Process Technol

DOI: 10.4172/2157-7110.S1.002

Abstract
Women whose vaginal lactobacilli are hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) producers are at less risk of reproductive tract infections than women whose lactobacilli are non-producers. This epidemiological correlation, together with in vitro observations of H2O2 producers inactivating pathogens, has made H2O2 production a prime criterion for selecting lactobacilli strains to be developed as vaginal probiotics. However, epidemiological correlation does not imply causation, and the in vitro observations of pathogen inactivation were made under aerobic conditions, in the absence of antioxidants, and disregarded activation of lactobacilli themselves. Whereas in vivo: 1) Lactobacilli do not produce H2O2 under the hypoxic (low oxygen) conditions that usually prevail in the vagina. 2) The high antioxidant capacity of cervicovaginal fluid (CVF) means that little H2O2 accumulates even under aerobic conditions. The low concentration of H2O2 that does accumulate in CVF does not inactivate pathogens. 3) When enough exogenous H2O2 is supplied to inactivate pathogens, vaginal lactobacilli are also inactivated. We conclude that H2O2 production by vaginal lactobacilli is implausible as a mechanism of protection against reproductive tract infections, and therefore an unsound basis for probiotic selection. We hypothesize, instead, that H2O2 production correlates with another characteristic that does provide in vivo protection. Alternatively, H2O2 producers may be more sensitive to the presence of some pathogens; in this case, H2O2 producers would correlate with the absence of these pathogens, without implying that H2O2 producers protect against those pathogens.
Biography
Deirdre Elizabeth O?Hanlon is from the Republic of Ireland. She received her B.S. in biochemistry from Wells College, Aurora NY, and her Ph.D. in biology from Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore MD in the United States. Her doctoral research focused on the different parameters for pathogen inactivation by vaginal lactobacilli in vivo versus in vitro. She is currently continuing her research in the university?s Department of Biophysics, looking at probiotic development and other means of supplementing women?s mucosal and microbiotal protection against reproductive tract infections. She is the author or co-author of four peer reviewed articles publishing her findings.
Relevant Topics
Leave Your Message 24x7
Top