Reach Us +1 218 451 2974
Kinesio Tape Vs Neuromuscular Stimulation For Conservative Treatment Of Hemiplegic Shoulder: A Randomized Controlled Trial | 75584
ISSN: 2155-9562

Journal of Neurology & Neurophysiology
Open Access

Like us on:

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Kinesio tape vs Neuromuscular stimulation for conservative treatment of hemiplegic shoulder: A randomized controlled trial


Gul Oznur Karabicak and Burcu Talu

Baskent University, Turkey Inonu University, Turkey

ScientificTracks Abstracts: J Neurol Neurophysiol

DOI: 10.4172/2155-9562-C1-058

This study aimed to compare the effects of kinesiotaping and neuromuscular electric stimulation (NMES)on pain, and motor activity and function in patients with upper extremity hemiplegia. A total of 67 outpatients who acquired ischemic stroke with the upper extremity involvement were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to an NMES group, a kinesiotape implementation group, and a control group in addition to physiotherapy. Treatment duration was 4 weeks. Motor Activity Log- 28, Fugl–Meyer Sensorimotor Assessment Scale (FM), and visual analog scale (VAS) were used for the assessment. A significant improvement in FM (taping group, p ≤ 0.001; NMES, p ≤ 0.001; control group, p ≤ 0.001) and motor activity scores was found in all groups, although this effect was superior in function for the taping group (p = 0.027). A significant decrease was found in the pain intensity both at rest (taping group: P ≤ 0.007; NMES: P ≤ 0.014), and with activity for the taping and NMES groups (taping: p≤ 0.010; NMES: p≤ 0.016), whereas no significant decrease was found in the control group either at rest or with activity (p = 0.054 for both). No reverse effect was reported. Data suggested that all treatment options were effective on motor activity and pain but kinesiotaping seemed to have a superior effect on function.

Gul Oznur Karabicak has completed his PhD at the age of 29 years from Hacettepe University and still works as a assistant proffessor in Baskent University Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department. She mainly studies on rehabilitation, exercise, orthapaedics.

Relevant Topics