alexa Predicting Ligand Binding Affinity: A Comparative Study On The Use Of Docking Vs. Bayesian Categorization And Random Forest Recursive Partitioning
ISSN: 2161-0444

Medicinal chemistry
Open Access

Like us on:
OMICS International organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations

700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Share This Page

Additional Info

Loading
Loading Please wait..
 

3rd International Conference on Medicinal Chemistry & Computer Aided Drug Designing
December 08-10, 2014 DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel San Francisco Airport, USA

David C Kombo
ScientificTracks Abstracts: Med Chem
DOI: 10.4172/2161-0444.S1.011
Abstract
Aiming at comparing ligand-based design (LBD) and structure-based design (SBD) methods, we have carried out docking into homology models and Bayesian categorization to predict ligand binding at various human and rat nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes. We found that although results vary with receptor subtype, Bayesian categorization exhibits higher accuracy and enrichment than unconstrained docking into homology models. However, docking accuracy is improved when one sets up a hydrogen-bond (HB) constraint between the cationic center of the ligand and the main-chain carbonyl group of the conserved Trp-149 or its homologue (a residue involved in cation-π interactions with the ligand basic nitrogen atom). This finding suggests that this HB is a hallmark of nicotinic ligands binding to nAChRs. We also found that ligandbased Bayesian-derived enrichment factors and structure-based docking-derived enrichment factors highly correlate to each other. Moreover, they correlate with the mean molecular fractional polar surface area of actives ligands and the fractional hydrophobic/hydrophilic surface area of the binding site, respectively. We are extending our studies by comparing LBD methods Bayesian categorization and recursive partitioning random forest with SBD docking into binding sites of proteins with experimentally-derived three-dimensional structure.
image PDF   |   image HTML
 
Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords