Reach Us +44-7482-864460
Weaknesses In The Big Bang Theory: The Need For New Theory | 79890
ISSN: 2329-6542

Journal of Astrophysics & Aerospace Technology
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
Recommended Conferences
Related Subjects
Share This Page

Weaknesses in the Big Bang Theory: The need for new theory

2nd International Conference on Astrophysics and Particle Physics

Ghassan H Halasa

University of Jordan, Jordan

Keynote: J Astrophys Aerospace Technol

DOI: 10.4172/2329-6542-C1-010

Classical physics confirms that inertial reference frames can exist at any speed including at and above the speed of light. Relativity theory does not exclude inertial reference frame from existing at the speed of light as long as they did not accelerate to that speed from higher or lower speeds. Lorentz transformations state that inertial reference frames at the speed of light occupy zero volume and has infinite mass. In the Big Bang Theory, prior to the big explosion, dense matter occupied zero volume. The dense matter must have existed inside a speed of light (sonic) inertial reference frame. The following are some of the Big Bang Theory weaknesses. From the sonic reference frame point of view, the mass of the infinite dense matter could have been either finite or infinite. Lorentz equations indicate that for finite or infinite masses, both are viewed as infinite masses as viewed from rest. If the dense matter mass was finite, then this mass will be reduced further through its excursion to lower speed from the sonic speed towards rest. This situation does not explain our universe formation since this lower mass does not reflect the mass of the universe. If the mass was infinite, which is more likely, it may explain the universe inflation as predicted in the Big Bang Theory. If this is the case, then the dense matter must have occupied huge volume, equivalent to our universe huge space in the sonic reference frame as observed from inside that frame. For a huge volume and mass to slow down from the sonic reference frame it must have taken much longer time than the extremely short time as predicted by the Big Bang Theory. When the infinite mass dense matter was ejected from the speed of light reference frame, it must have been ejected through a canon like explosion in a direction opposite to the direction of the speed of light so that it slowed down to rest and stayed in the rest reference frame. The low of conservation of momentum tells us that there must have been an equal reaction in the direction of the speed of light; meaning at a supersonic reference frame. It is shown that at rest supersonic momentum is real and can be observed from rest. There is no evidence of such occurrence. A new theory was recently published based on the hypothesis that the universe started 13.7 billion years ago as one electron and one proton were ejected from a sonic inertial reference frame in opposite directions along the speed of light direction forming space and the early hydrogen atom, the bases of all matter. This theory is based on the following observed facts: 1) Electrons are in continuous motion. 2) Attraction between positive and negative charges. 3) The universe is electrically neutral; that is, negative and positive charges are equal throughout the universe.

Ghassan H Halasa has retired from University of Jordan as Professor of Electrical Engineering. His early education was in Physics. He is a Fulbright Scholar at Murray State University in 2004 and a Visiting Professor at Western Michigan University in 2008. Most of his recent published work was in Electrical Engineering in the field of Renewable Energy. Recently, he published a book as an alternative to the Big Bang Theory.