alexa Prophylactic Strategy for Peritoneal Recurrence after Curative Operation in Pancreatic Cancer | OMICS International
ISSN: 2157-7099
Journal of Cytology & Histology

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Prophylactic Strategy for Peritoneal Recurrence after Curative Operation in Pancreatic Cancer

Kenichiro Yamamoto1*, Shinya Shimada1, Masafumi Kuramoto1, Satoshi Ikeshima1, Toshiro Masuda1, Kenichi Nakamura1, Shinichi Yoshimatsu2, Masayuki Urata2 and Hideo Baba3

1Department of Surgery, Kumamoto Social Insurance General Hospital, Yatsushiro, Kumamoto, Japan

2Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kumamoto Social Insurance General Hospital, Yatsushiro, Kumamoto, Japan

3Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan

*Corresponding Author:
Kenichiro Yamamoto
Department of Surgery
Kumamoto Social Insurance General Hospital
10-10 Tohricho, Yatsushiro
Kumamoto 866-8660, Japan
Tel: +81-965-32-7111
Fax: +81-965-32-2772
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: August 08, 2013; Accepted date: September 25, 2013; Published date: September 27, 2013

Citation: Yamamoto K, Shimada S, Kuramoto M, Ikeshima S,Masuda T (2013) Prophylactic Strategy for Peritoneal Recurrence after Curative Operation in Pancreatic Cancer. J Cytol Histol 4:185. doi: 10.4172/2157-7099.1000185

Copyright: © 2013 Yamamoto K, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Cytology & Histology

Abstract

Even though curative surgery has been performed for patients with pancreatic cancer without peritoneal free cancer cells at laparotomy, many patients die of peritoneal recurrence. The reason for this fact is postulated that the surgical procedure itself could cause spread of cancer cells into peritoneal cavity. To identify the free cancer cells spilled in the peritoneal cavity during the operation, we have established real-time quantitative reverse transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) system. Moreover, we have devised Extensive Intraoperative Peritoneal Lavage (EIPL) therapy as a very simple and non-aggressive prophylactic treatment for peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer patients with peritoneal free cancer cells. In this paper, we review the validity of EIPL therapy navigated by real-time quantitative RT-PCR detecting free cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity during operation, and the effect of this therapy on the survival after curative operations in patients with pancreatic cancer

Keywords

Pancreatic cancer; Peritoneal free cancer cells; EIPL therapy; RT-PCR

Introduction

Pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in industrialized countries [1], and is well known as a miserable disease with the overall 5-year survival rate ranging from 7% to 25% after potentially curative surgical operation [2-6]. One of the major features of pancreatic cancer is its early peritoneal dissemination as well as liver metastasis after curative surgical treatment [7-10]. Peritoneal recurrence was found in more than half of the patients, which determines the high mortality rate [8,9]. To improve longterm survival, multidisciplinary approaches combined with surgery whenever possible have been adopted to try to eradicate the recurrent patterns, but these measures do not seem to improve survival any more than that by standard resection [11-14].

Although it is thought that the minimal cancer cells that already existed at the site of recurrence (Micrometastasis) at the time of surgery may be a mechanism of recurrence [15-17]. The surgical operation itself might have caused the peritoneal dissemination of these cancer cells. In fact, it has been proven that surgical procedures for gastrointestinal cancers disseminate cancer cells into the systemic circulation and or intra-peritoneal space [18-20]. If possible, this type of cancer dissemination should be eradicated at the time of the surgical operation.

We have established EIPL (Extensive Intra-operative Peritoneal Lavage) therapy as a useful technique that eradicates the intra-peritoneal free cancer cells in patients with gastric cancer to prevent peritoneal metastasis before implantation of the peritoneal free cancer cells [20,21]. The peritoneal cavity was extensively washed and completely aspirated using 1l of physiological saline 10 times based on the ‘limiting dilution method&rsquo after the potentially curative operation. EIPL therapy is quite a powerful method for reducing the number of peritoneal free cancer cells to potentially zero. Our recent study has clearly revealed that combined with intraperitoneal chemotherapy, EIPL therapy significantly improved the survival of the gastric cancer patients with peritoneal free cancer cells without peritoneal disseminations after potentially curative operations [21,22]. Recently, we employed EIPL therapy for the patients with pancreatic cancer after a curative operation and obtained favorable results [23].

In this review article, we focus on the usefulness of evaluating the status of abdominal free cancer cells by using the ultra-rapid quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RTPCR) system and the ability of EIPL therapy as a prophylactic strategy for peritoneal recurrence in patients with pancreatic cancer after curative operation.

Detection of intraperitoneal free cancer cells by real-time quantitative RT-PCR

Cytological analysis has been the gold standard for detecting cancer cells in the peritoneal lavage during operation, however, it has generally been said to lack of sensitivity. In recent years, molecular approaches using the PCR technique have been applied to various clinical fields and have become one of the useful diagnostic tools.

RT-PCR has been developed for screening a small amount of tumor cells in circulating blood, bone marrow, lymph nodes, and peritoneal lavege fluid [24-34]. Its sensitivity is much higher than that of conventional and immunohistochemical cytological examinations [33]. So the RT-PCR technique is suitable for detecting minute quantities of peritoneal free cancer cells. However, RT-PCR has its own drawbacks, such as the following: (a) it has time-consuming gene amplification and subsequent data analysis; and (b) results of RT-PCR involve, even in low frequency, false-positive results exist by DNA contamination or pseudogenes [35].

Therefore, we established ‘real-time quantitative RT-PCR system&rsquo, ; which is a combined system of an ultra-rapid RT-PCR using a fully automated mRNA extractor and a real-time one-step RT-PCR system with hybridization probe format for detection of peritoneal free cancer cells. This new method enabled us to obtain the results of RT-PCR in a short time after sampling. Furthermore, we carried out multiple markers RT-PCR assay for a combination of CEA and CK20 to eliminate falsepositive results and to improve specificity.

Peritoneal lavage samples from 58 patients with non-serosainvasive gastric cancer were obtained at laparotomy and immediately after lymph node dissection, and CEA- and CK20-specific RT-PCRs were performed using the real-time quantitative RT-PCR system to identify the free cancer cells in the samples [20]. This method enabled us to complete the detection of cancer cells within approximately 70 min. In the samples of lavage at laparotomy, CEA mRNA and CK20 mRNA were not detected in patients without serosal invasion, but in the peritoneal lavage samples after lymph node dissection, both the CEA and CK20 mRNA products were detected in 13 of 63 patients (20.6%; Figure 1) [20]. They were not observed in mucosal tumors, but were identified in three (14.3%), four (26.7%), and six (46.2%) patients with submucosal, muscularis proplia, and subserosal tumors, respectively. These results suggested that lymph node dissection itself opened lymphatic channels and spread viable cancer cells into the peritoneal cavity, and this was the one of the mechanisms of peritoneal metastasis from non-serosa-invasive cancer.

cytology-histology-ultra-rapid-RT-PCR

Figure 1: Representative results of ultra-rapid RT-PCR by LightCycler in a patient with SM tumor of well-differentiated adenocarcinoma with lymph node metastasis and lymphatic invasion. Curve 1, WiDr colon cancer cells as a positive control; curve 2, i.p. lavage sample at laparotomy; curve 3, i.p. lavage sample immediately after lymph node dissection; curve 4, no template as a negative control.

Extensive Intraoperative Peritoneal Lavage (EIPL) therapy

We have proposed EIPL for reducing the number of intraperitoneal free cancer cells as a useful intraoperative technique [21]. Briefly, the peritoneal cavity is extensively stirred and washed after the potentially curative operation, which is followed by the complete aspiration of the fluid. This procedure is done 10 times using 1L of physiological saline. Ten washes of a 1:10 dilution result in just 1 cancerous cell from 1010 cells in the abdominal cavity. Furthermore, sufficient stirring and washing of the abdominal cavity would remove the cancer cells which merely adhere to the peritoneum.

We performed EIPL to the five cases of serosa-invasive gastric cancer with CY+/P-, and its efficacy was evaluated by the ultra-rapid quantitative RT-PCR protocol. Sequential washing of intraperitoneal free cancer cells of 3.8 × 105 ± 1.4×105 / 100ml of lavage decreased the number to 2.8 ± 1.5 cells by 6 to 8 washes. Free cancer cells were not detected in the fluid after that (Figure 2) [20]. On the other hand, 2.8 × 104 ± 4.5×104 of intraperitoneal free cancer cells still remained in 100ml of the lavage when not treated with EIPL.

cytology-histology-ultra-rapid-quantitative

Figure 2: Representative results of ultra-rapid quantitative RT-PCR of the serial extensive lavages by LightCycler. Curves and Lanes 1st-10th were 100-ml samples from the first to the tenth wash, each using 1 liter of saline. WiDr was a positive control containing 105 cells in 100 ml of saline, and DW contained no template. The free cancer cells in the lavage fluids were serially diluted by 8 liters of saline and disappeared in washing fluids after the eighth wash.

Application of EIPL Therapy to Pancreatic Cancer

Analysis of free cancer cells during the operation

As a pilot study, we undertook real-time quantitative RT-PCR of the peritoneal lavage fluid from 8 patients who underwent pancreatectomy (6 patients of pancreatic cancer, 1 patient of pancreatic cancer with peritoneal dissemination, 1 patient of chronic pancreatitis) [23]. Peritoneal lavage was performed three times during the operation: at the time of laparotomy, immediately after lymph node dissection and after pancreatectomy. The results were that both CEA mRNA and CK20 mRNA products were observed in 2 (33.3%) and 4 (66.7%) patients with pancreatic cancer after lymph node dissection and removal of the tumor, respectively (Table 1) [23]. These data suggest that the operation itself could cause spreading of cancer cells to peritoneal cavity, which then would lead to peritoneal recurrence after curative surgery for pancreatic cancer as well as gastric cancer like we previously demonstrated.

Patient No. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR   (cell/100ml) T* N* Recurrent pattern Disease-free Period (months)
Laparotomy After LN resection After pancreatectomy After EIPL        
Pancreatic cancer
 1 negative negative negative NA 3 0 none alive
 2 negative negative 135 negative 2 1 liver 6
 3 negative negative 285 negative 3 0 none alive
 4 negative 950 2313 negative 3 1 liver 4
 5 negative negative negative NA 2 0 liver 4
 6 negative 851 783 negative 4 1 lung 13
Pancreatic cancer with peritoneal dissemination
1 5210 ND ND NA 4 1 peritoneal 0
Pancreatitis
 1 negative negative negative NA  

Table 1: Real-time quantitative RT-PCR of peritoneal lavage fluid in serial surgical procedures.

EIPL therapy in pancreatic cancer

We adopted EIPL therapy to pancreatectomy for the patients with pancreatic cancer to confirm the impact of EIPL therapy in preventing peritoneal recurrence after a curative surgical operation [23]. We designed a cohort study for the pancreatic cancer patients. This study was based on 39 consecutive patients with invasive ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas who underwent curative surgical treatment. The patients were divided into two groups: the non-EIPL group, patients without EIPL therapy (n=24); and the EIPL group, patients with EIPL therapy (n=15). All patients were followed up at the outpatient clinic every 2 to 3 months, and computed tomography was ordered to check any recurrences every 4 to 6 months. Any patients did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy.

Clinicopathological findings including the mean age, sex, location of tumor, pathological tumor stage, histological type and surgical treatment did not differ between the two groups, but peritoneal recurrence was significantly reduced in the EIPL group, compared with the non-EIPL group (Table 2) [23]. Univariate logistic regession analysis showed that peritoneal recurrence had significant correlation with lymph node metastasis and EIPL therapy, and multivariate analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis and EIPL therapy were independent factors related to peritoneal recurrence. EIPL therapy was an independent negative risk factor for formation of peritoneal recurrence after curative operation, whereas lymph node metastasis was a positive one (Table 3) [23].

Recurrent pattern EIPL   Non-EIPL   P value
(n=15) (n=24)
Peritoneal 1 (6.7) 11 (45.8) 0.013
Hepatic 6 (40.0) 12 (50.0) 0.742
Lymph node 4 (26.7) 5 (20.8) 0.711
Local 2 (13.3) 7 (29.2) 0.437
Extra-abdominal 2 (13.3) 5 (20.8) 0.685
Total 9 (60.0) 20 (83.3) 0.141

Table 2: Comparison of recurrent patterns between the groups with and without EIPL therapy.

Variable Risk ratio 95%Cl P value
N 13.072 1.124-152.075 0.040
(positive vs negative)      
EIPL 0.084 0.007-0.936 0.044
(with vs without)      

Table 3: Multivariate analysis of the independent risk factors for peritoneal recurrence.

Based on these findings, we analyzed whether EIPL therapy improved cancer-free survival after curative operation. The 2-year cancer-free survival rates of the non-EIPL and EIPL group were 16.7% and 40%, respectively (Figure 3) [23]. The cancer specific 2-year survival curve of the EIPL group tended to be improved compared with the non-EIPL group, and was nearly of statistical significance.

cytology-histology-free-survival-curves

Figure 3: Kaplan-Meier disease free survival curves for the EIPL (extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage) and non-EIPL groups (log-rank test, P =0.097). Solid line: patients with EIPL therapy, broken line: patients without EIPL therapy.

Validity of EIPL therapy in the operation of pancreatic cancer

These our results strongly indicate that the serial surgical procedures of pancreatectomy are major factors in the spread of variable free cancer cells into the peritoneal cavity leading to the formation of peritoneal recurrence after curative operation. We have previously proposed that EIPL therapy is quite a formidable method for reducing the number of cells to potentially zero. Therefore, we applied this therapy to patients with pancreatic cancer in which free cancer cells might spill through due to the surgical procedures. In fact, large numbers of cancer cells disseminated into the peritoneal cavity during operation, as already described. Statistical analysis demonstrated that EIPL therapy was an independent factor in preventing the formation of peritoneal recurrence. Furthermore, the 2-year cancer-free survival of the EIPL group was substantially improved compared with the non-EIPL group. In our pilot study, no-touch isolation technique followed by EIPL therapy decreased the total recurrence after curative operation for pancreatic cancer [36]. Thus, to improve long-term survival in such an aggressive disease as pancreatic cancer, a combined treatment of EIPL with no-touch isolation surgery followed by effective chemotherapy may be worth trying to eradicate recurrence after curative operation.

Conclusion

EIPL therapy navigated by real-time quantitative RT-PCR detecting free cancer cells spilled in the peritoneal cavity during operation is a new strategy preventing peritoneal recurrence, especially in patients with pancreatic or gastric cancer, in which peritoneal dissemination is common after curative operation. Frequent washing and complete aspiration may not be an appealing activity at the end of a time consuming operation, but this procedure is quite a powerful method for reducing the number of cells to potentially zero and, furthermore, it can be performed anywhere and at anytime. The use of EIPL may be applied to all patients with pancreatic cancer after curative operation as well as to patients with cytological peritoneal free cancer cells without overt peritoneal dissemination.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11864
  • [From(publication date):
    November-2013 - Jul 17, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8100
  • PDF downloads : 3764
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]e.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7