alexa Protective Effect of a Synthetic Antioxidant “Acetyl Gallate Derivative” Against Dimethoate Induced DNA Damage and Oxidant/Antioxidant Status in Male Rats | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2161-0525
Journal of Environmental & Analytical Toxicology
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Protective Effect of a Synthetic Antioxidant “Acetyl Gallate Derivative” Against Dimethoate Induced DNA Damage and Oxidant/Antioxidant Status in Male Rats

Tarek M. Heikal1*, Abdel-Tawab H. Mossa1, Galal A. M. Nawwar2, Mahmoud El-Sherbiny3 and Hassan Z. Ghanem3
1Pesticide Chemistry Department, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt
2Green Chemistry Department, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt
3Therapeutic Chemistry Department, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt
Corresponding Author : Tarek M. Heikal
Environmental Toxicology Research Unit (ETRU)
Pesticide Chemistry Department, National Research Centre
Tahrir Street, P.O. Box 12311, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt
Tel: 202-33371211-33371615
Fax: 202-33370931
E-mail: tarekhl@yahoo.com
Received July 02, 2012; Accepted September 13, 2012; Published September 18, 2012
Citation: Heikal TM, Mossa ATH, Nawwar GAM, El-Sherbiny M, Ghanem HZ (2012) Protective Effect of a Synthetic Antioxidant “Acetyl Gallate Derivative” Against Dimethoate Induced DNA Damage and Oxidant/Antioxidant Status in Male Rats. J Environ Anal Toxicol 2:155. doi: 10.4172/2161-0525.1000155
Copyright: © 2012 Heikal TM, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Environmental & Analytical Toxicology

Abstract

The present study was conducted to investigate the protective effects of a synthetic antioxidant “acetyl gallate derivative” (SAC) against hepatic oxidative stress and brain DNA damage induced by dimethoate (DM) in male rats. DM was orally administrated to the rats at a dose of 38.7 mg kg-1 b.wt. (1/10 LD50), for 28 consecutive days. Additional DM groups received either SAC or vitamin C (VC) at a dose of 200 mg kg-1 b.wt. 30 min before DM administration. Compared to the control, DM induced a statistical reduction in body weight gain, while induced a statistical increase in absolute and relative liver weights. Oral administration of DM significantly caused increases in hepatic lipid peroxidation (LPO) and activities of antioxidant enzymes including catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione-s-transferease (GST), while caused decreases in glutathione content (GSH) and serum cholinesterase(ChE) activity. Administration of SAC attenuates LPO, GSH content and antioxidant enzymes system. The severity of brain DNA damage monitored by damage index (DI) and damage frequency % (DF) induced by DM was mitigated after administration of SAC. In conclusion, supplementation of SAC is more reliable than VC in attenuating relative liver weight, SOD, GST, and brain DNA damage.

Keywords
Antioxidant enzymes; Dimethoate; DNA damage; Acetyl gallate derivative; Oxidative stress
Introduction
Pesticides are occasionally used indiscriminately in large amounts causing environmental pollution and potential health hazards. Organophosphate pesticides (OP) are primarily recongnized for their ability to induce toxicity in mammals through inhibition of acethylcholinesterase (AChE) [1]. Also, it has been demonstrated that lipid peroxidation mediated by free radicals is one of the molecular mechanisms involved in OP-induced toxicity [2,3] and several pesticides exert their biological effects through electrophilic attack on the cellular constituents of hepatic and brain tissues [4] with simultaneous generation of reactive oxygen species [5]. In this regard, several studies have proved oxidative stress is induced by OP in rats [2,3,6-8] and in humans [9].
Dimethoate, DM, (O, O-dimethyl S-N-methyl carbamoyl methyl phosphorodithioate) is widely used against a broad range of insects and mites and is also used for indoor control of houseflies. The extensive use of DM poses a health hazard to animals and humans because of its persistence in soil and crops [10]. Previous studies have shown that acute and sub-chronic exposure to DM alters the antioxidant status and the histology of liver and induce hepatic lipid peroxidation in mice [11] and rats [2,12-14].
Antioxidants as vitamins, can prevent the uncontrolled formation of free radicals or inhibit their reaction with biological sites, also the destruction of most free radicals rely on the oxidation of endogenous antioxidants mainly by scavenging and reducing molecules [15]. Vitamin C (VC), as a water soluble antioxidant is reported to neutralize reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reduce oxidative DNA damage and hence genetic mutations [16,17]. In our laboratory, newly synthesized compounds utilizing acetyl gallate derivatives (SAC) have been tested in vitro as antioxidants [18]. The 2-Cyano-N-[1-(2’, 3’,4’-trimethoxyphenyl)ethylidene]acetohydrazide (Figure 1) showed an interesting antioxidant activity and absence of mortality of rats received 5000 mg kg-1 b.wt. of this compound rationale further in vivo study. Therefore, the objectives of this study was conducted to investigate the protective effects of a synthetic antioxidant acetyl gallate derivative (SAC) against hepatic oxidative stress and brain DNA damage induced by DM in male rats.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Healthy male Wister rats weighing 160 ±10 g were obtained from the Animal Breeding House of the National Research Centre (NRC), Dokki, Cairo, Egypt, and maintained in clean plastic cages in the laboratory animal room (23 ± 2°C). On standard pellet diet, tap water ad libitum, and daily dark/light cycle (12/12 hrs.) the rats were acclimatized for 1 week prior to the start of experiments. The experimental work on rats was performed with the approval of the Animal Care & Experimental Committee, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt, and international guidelines for care and use of laboratory animals.
Chemicals
Dimethoate (Perfekthion® 40% EC, BASF, Germany) and Vitamin C (L-Ascorbic acid) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich Chemie (Steinheim, Germany). Kits used for biochemical measurements were purchased from Biodiagnostic, Giza, Egypt. All other chemicals were of reagent grades and were obtained from the local scientific distributors in Egypt.
Synthesis of 2-Cyano-N-[1-(2, 3, 4-trimethoxyphenyl) ethylidene]acetohydrazide
The antioxidant compound used in the experiment was prepared in our laboratory according to El-Ebiary et al. [18].
Animal treatment schedule
Rats were randomly divided into 6 groups each containing 6 animals (6 rats/cage). The route of administration selected for the study was daily oral gavage for 28 consecutive days. Rats in Group I served as control and were given DMSO (0.5 ml/rat). Rats in Group II (VC) were given vitamin C in water at a dose of 200 mg/kg b.wt. (0.5 ml/ rat). Rats in Group III (SAC) were administered SAC in DMSO at a dose of 200 mg kg-1 b.wt. Rats in Group IV (DM) were administered dimethoate in water at a dose of 38.7 mg kg-1 b.wt. (1/10 LD50) Tomlin [19]. Rats in Group V (DM+VC) and VI (DM+SAC) were given the same doses of VC and SAC as in groups II and III 30 min before the administration of DM (38.7 mg kg-1 b.wt.), respectively. During the experimental duration, body weights were weekly recorded and the doses of the tested compounds were modulated accordingly.
The selected dose of vitamin C (200 mg kg-1 b.wt) was cited from previous investigators [20,21], whereas, the dose of DM used in this study (1/10 of LD50) was adopted by many previous investigators, since it is toxic but not lethal to rats [12,22].
Data recording and sample collection
After completion of treatment period, body weights were recorded. Blood samples were withdrawn from the animals under light ether anesthesia by puncturing the retro-orbital venous plexus of the animals with a fine sterilized glass capillary tube. The collected blood samples were left for 20 minutes to coagulate at room temperature, and then centrifuged at 600 x g for 10 min to separate the sera. The sera were kept for one week in a deep freezer (-20°C) until analyzed.
The rats were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Immediately, brain tissues were cryopreserverd at -80°C in RPMI 1640 media (w/o L-Glutamine, w/ 25 mM Hepes) (biowest) Containing 10% DMSO and 1% Fetal Calf Serum, until processing for comet assay. Liver tissues were isolated, cleaned from of adhering matters, washed with icecold saline solution, weighed and stored at -70°C for the biochemical studies.
Biochemical measurements
The sera and liver homogenates obtained from different treatments were stored and subjected to certain biochemical analyses by using Shimadzu UV-VIS Recording 2401 PC (Japan).
Lipid peroxidation (LPO) and glutathione (GSH): Liver tissues were separately homogenized in ice-cold 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA) for 2 min to yield a 10% (w/v) homogenates, using a Teflon-fitted Potter Elvehjem homogenizer. The homogenates were centrifuged at 800 x g at 4°C for 15 min. The supernatants were immediately collected and used for the quantification of LPO and GSH according to the method of Ohkawa et al. [23] and Owens and Belcher [24], respectively. LPO was determined based on the formation of thiobabituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) at 532 nm and expressed as the extent of malondialdehyde (MDA) production. GSH is based on the reaction of DTNB [5, 5- dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid)] with GSH and yield a yellow colored chromophore; 5-thio-nitrobenzoic acid with a maximum absorbance at 412 nm.
Antioxidant enzymes: Another part of liver tissues were separately homogenized in ice-cold 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA and 1 mL/L Triton X-100) for 2 min to yield a 10% (w/v) homogenates. The homogenates were centrifuged at 800 x g at 4°C for 15 min. The supernatants were immediately used for assaying catalase (CAT) activity by the method of Aebi [25]. The activity of CAT was expressed as nmoles min-1 mg-1 protein and the change in absorbance was measured at 510 nm.
Parts of liver tissues were separately homogenized in ice-cold 0.25 M sucrose for 2 min to yield a 10% (w/v) homogenates. The homogenates were centrifuged at 800 x g at 4°C for 15 min. The supernatants were immediately used for assaying superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity by the method of Nishikimi et al. [26]. The activity of SOD was expressed as units of SOD min-1 mg-1 protein and the change in absorbance was measured at 560 nm.
Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activity was assayed by the method of Habig et al. in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0, 2 mM EDTA) [27]. The activity was expressed as μmol of 1-chloro-2, 4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB)-GSH conjugate min-1mg-1 protein and the change in absorbance at 340 nm was monitored in a UV-visible spectrophotometer.
Total protein and Cholinesterase (CHE): The protein concentrations were measured as described by Lowry et al. in liver homogenate [28]. Cholinesterase (ChE; EC 3.1.1.8) activity was determined in the sera according to the method described by Ellman et al. [29].
DNA damage analysis
The alkaline comet assay (or single cell gel electrophoresis-SCGE) was carried out as described by Singh et al. and Tice et al. [30,31]. Prealiquot cyropreserved brain cells were thawed in water bath at 37°C, wash with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 20 mM EDTA (Ca2+ and Mg2+ free), then weigh. Each piece of 0.2 g of cerebral cortex of brain tissue was placed in 1 ml of cold PBS phosphate-buffered saline containing 20 mM EDTA (Ca2+ and Mg2+ free) and minced into fine pieces in order to obtain a cellular suspension. These cells from brain (10 μl) were embedded in 95 μl of 0.75% low melting agarose (Gibco-BRL).The mixture (cell/agarose) was added to a fully frosted microscope slide coated with a layer of 300 μl of normal melting agarose (1%) (Gibco- BRL). After solidification, the slides were placed in lysis buffer (2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM EDTA and 10 mM Tris, pH 10.0, with freshly added 1% Triton X-100 (Sigma) and 10% DMSO) for one h at 4°C. Subsequently, the slides were incubated in freshly made alkaline buffer (300 mM NaOH and 1 mM EDTA, pH>13) for 20 min, at 4°C to allow DNA to unwind. An electric current of 300 mA and 25 V (0.90 V/cm) was applied for 15 min to electrophoreses the DNA. After electrophoresis, the slides were placed in a staining tray and covered with neutralizing solution (0.4M Tris, pH 7.5) for 5 min and washed three times. The slides were drained and 50 μl of ethidium bromide solution (20 μg ml-1) (Sigma) were added. Slides were placed in a humid dark box at 4°C until analysis, which was done immediately.
The presence of comets was examined in cells using Leica epifluorescent microscope (Green filter), the images for the brain cell nucleoids were digitalized with Leica DFC camera. DFC 280 supplied with Leica DFC Twain software with Host application program Imaging® to view and capture digital images.
Scoring of the slide was done visually according to tail size into five classes (0, 1, 2, 3, 4) ranging from undamaged (class 0) to maximum damage (class 4) (Figure 2), resulting in a single DNA damage score for each animal, and consequently each studied group. Coded slides were scored blindly and 100 brain cell nucleoids were scored from each animal (50 per slide). Therefore, the composite score (damage index) can range from 0 (completely undamaged, 100 cells x 0) to 400 (with maximum damage, 100x4) as described by Collins et al. [32]. The damage frequency (%) was calculated based on a number of cells with tail versus those with no tails.
Statistical analysis
The results were expressed as means ± standard deviation. All data were done with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 11.0 for windows). The results were analyzed using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s test for comparison between different treatment groups. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.
Results
The effects of DM on general rat health
Generally, no death was observed in any of the experimental groups during the treatment period (28 days). However, few clinical signs such as huddling, reduced activity and hair loss were observed in DM-treated rats. The observed signs were related to the cholinergic syndromes. However, except of huddling, no other clinical manifestation was observed following either VC or SAC supplementation.
Body and organ weights
At the end of the experimental period, body weight gain, absolute and relative liver weights did not significantly differ in VC-treated and SAC-treated groups compared to the control group (Table 2). However, there was a statistically significant decrease in the body weight gain and a significant increase in the relative liver weights when DM and DM+VC-treated groups compared to the control group.
Cholinesterase activity (ChE)
Compared to control value, the activity of ChE was inhibited, by 32%, in the sera of rats administered DM (Figure 3). This inhibition was attenuated by 13.75% in VC supplementation and by 10.44% in SAC supplementation.
Lipid peroxidation and glutathione (LPO & GSH)
In DM-treated group, LPO in hepatic tissue was increased significantly (Figure 4), while GSH content was decreased significantly (Figure 5), when compared to the control group. However, supplementation of either VC or SAC attenuated the significant changes in both LPO and GSH content. Further, SAC treatment, by itself, boosted GSH content in the liver tissue. VC was more effective than SAC in attenuating the hepatic LPO.
Antioxidant enzymes
Data on the activities of various hepatic antioxidant enzymes following DM, VC, and SAC treatments is presented in Table 2. The activities of CAT, SOD and GST enzymes were significantly increased among DM-treated rats compared to the control group. Supplementation of either VC or SAC to DM-treated group attenuated the statistically significant increases in the activities of both CAT and GST. However, supplementation of SAC induced non significant changes in SOD activity. Furthermore, supplementation of either VC or SAC significantly boosted the antioxidant enzyme activities of SOD and GST, while significantly decreased CAT activity in hepatic tissues (Table 2).
DNA damage results
Table 3 shows the effects of DM, VC, SAC treatments on damage index (DI) and damage frequency percent (DF), as measured by DNA damage in rat brain tissue, using the comet assay. Compared to the control values for DI (56.0) and DF (28.8), all the treatments except of SAC induced significant elevation (P<0.05) in the levels of the tested parameters, regardless the repairing and/or the ameliorating effect of both tested antioxidants. It is obvious from the data, that SAC compound was more potent than vitamin C in mitigating the elevated DNA damage represented by DI and DF values.
Figure 6 shows the extent of DNA damage in brain of rat treated with DM and different antioxidants, analyzed using a SCG assay (grades 0-4). In DM-treated group, the percent of maximum damage cells (grade 4) was 25.75% compared to the untreated group (3.25%). However, supplementations of either VC or SAC changed these values to 7.75 and 8%, respectively. Also, the undamaged cells (grade 0) was 77.75% in control group, which in turn changed to 28.25% in DM-treated group, however this percent was modulated to 41.25 and 48.75%, in case of MD+VC and MD+SAC groups, respectively.
Discussion
The present study addressed the potential of DM to induce hepatic oxidative stress and whether this oxidative stress can induce brain DNA damage, and to assess the extent of protective effect of either SAC or VC.
In toxicological studies, organ and relative organ weights are important criteria for evaluation of organ toxicity [2,33]. Observation in the present study demonstrates that subacute DM administration produced toxicity in rats as monitored by body weight loss and increase in relative and absolute liver weight. These observations are in accordance with those obtained by previous studies [11,13,14,34]. The reduction in body weight gains may be due to the combined action of cholinergic and oxidative stress [19,34-37] and/or due to the increased degradation of lipids and proteins as a direct effect of organophosphate compound exposure [38]. Moreover, the increase in liver weight could be attributed to the relationship between liver weight increase and various toxicological effects or to the reduction in body weight gain of experimental animals [2,34,36,39-41]. However, co-administration with SAC or VC attenuated the statistical different change of body and relative liver weights in DM-treated animals.
Since oxidative stress has been implicated to be an important component of the mechanism of toxicity of several Organophosphate Insecticides (OPI) [42,43], the measurements of LPO and GSH content as biomarkers of oxidative stress is crucial. In the current study, DM induced a significant increase in the levels of MDA accompanied by a significant decrease in GSH content in liver tissues. Our results are in agreement with similar data reported in different experimental models of rats exposed to dimethoate and other pesticides [11,13,37,40,42-44]. In fact, DM is a lipophilic substance and therefore it can interact with cellular liver membrane. MDA is a major oxidation product of peroxidized polyunsaturated fatty acids and its increase is an important indicator of lipid peroxidation [45]. Lipid peroxidation explain a number of deleterious effects such as increased membrane rigidity, osmotic fragility, decreased cellular deformation, reduced erythrocyte survival, and membrane fluidity [46]. So, the increase in lipid peroxidation leads to tissue injury and failure of the antioxidant defense mechanisms to prevent the formation of excess free radicals [47]. GSH can act either to detoxify ROS such as H2O2 or to reduce lipid peroxides themselves [48]. Depletion of GSH as observed in our results in DM-treated group reflects its potential for detoxification.
Free radicals are highly reactive and potentially damaging transient chemical species. Cellular injury is primarily due to inability of antioxidant to neutralize the effects of these radicals [2,40,42,43,49]. The protective action of antioxidant may be due to an inhibition of reactive oxygen species (ROS) inducing a chain reaction mediated by several antioxidant enzymes including SOD, GST and catalase. In our model, the significant increase in the hepatic activities of the antioxidant enzymes CAT and SOD after DM treatment may be due to an adaptive response to the generated free radicals [50] or may indicate an activation of the compensatory mechanism through the effect of DM on progenitor cells, and its extent depends on the magnitude of the oxidative stress and hence on the dose of stressor. Also, GST was significantly increased in DM-treated rats. GST are detoxifying enzymes that catalyze the conjugation of variety of electrophilic substrate to the thiol group of GSH, producing less toxic forms [51]. The increase in GST activity in the liver tissue among DM treated rats indicates the role played by this system in the detoxification of DM. Our results are consistent with previous researchers after DM and other insecticides administration to rats [11,14,17,40,52]. In contrast, other investigators reported reduction in the activities of antioxidant enzymes and they attributed this reduction to the inability of the organism to counteract the high production of ROS resulting from a high dose of DM [53]. From the other hand, co-administration of either VC or SAC showed a varying potent effect against oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation. Also, it is remarkable that SAC was more effective than VC in attenuating hepatic SOD activity.
Apart of lipid peroxidation and glutathione content, another major question addressed was whether DM induced DNA damage is mediated through oxidative stress. In the present study, DM treatment induced brain DNA damage evidenced by comet assay, which is a rapid, simple and sensitive technique for measuring and analyzing DNA breakage in separated cells [32]. The types of DNA damage produced by radiation and/or chemicals are many and varied, including single- and doublestrand breaks. The single cell gel electrophoreses test (SCG), or comet assay, adopted in our study is a rather new test with a widespread potential applications in genotoxicity testing and biomonitoring [30,51].
The increase of DNA damage in our result is consistent with previous investigators [17], who reported same result with chlorpyrifos. It is well documented that xenobiotic chemicals, including OPI, induce oxidative stress [42,43], which in turn leads to DNA damage recorded in our study. ROS left unbalanced by antioxidants (enzymatic) can result in damage to cellular macromolecules. In DNA, ROS can produce single- double strand DNA breaks, purine, pyrimidine, or deoxyribose modifications and DNA crosslink [54,55].
Antioxidants are believed to be directly antimutagenic and anticarcinogenic due to their radical scavenging properties [56-59]. Compounds showing antioxidant activity can reduce the main load of oxidative stress but when there is an imbalance between oxidizing and reducing equivalents where the former predominates, for example when the antioxidant is oxidized and thus converted into a prooxidant, the antioxidant cellular defenses cannot fully keep up with the oxidative stress and important cellular constituents are damaged [60]. In our model, the supplementation of the two tested antioxidants resulted in attenuation of oxidative stress and consequently reduction in DNA damage, especially with the SAC compound.
The role of vitamin C as antioxidant in biological systems is well known and can be summarized as scavenging free radical [59], restoring vitamin E [61], neutralizing the reactive oxygen metabolites, and reducing DNA damage and hence genetic mutation. In contrast, the supplementation of SAC is more reliable than VC in attenuating relative liver weight, SOD, GST, and brain DNA damage in DMtreated animals. The antioxidant activity of SAC has been attributed to various mechanisms, among which is the binding of transition metal ion. In this respect, it seems that the tri-hydroxyl system in galloyl moiety plays a decisive role. Also, the presence of carbonyl, active methylen, and nitrile groups in SAC afford a wide range of biological activities, which could extend its free radicals scavenging and terminate lipid peroxidation. However, further investigations are suggested to elucidate the precise protective mechanism of SAC against DNA damage and oxidative stress in mammals.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrates the capacity of VC and SAC to attenuate the hepatotoxicity and brain DNA damage in rat after subacute exposure to DM. It is also clear that SAC is more reliable than VC in attenuating relative liver weight, SOD, GST, and brain DNA damage in DM-treated animals. However, the accurate mechanism of SAC as antioxidant is not yet clear. So, further studies are warranted before SAC can be considered as a new synthetic antioxidant compound.
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to STDF which provided the financial support for the project ID 133.
References

Tables and Figures at a glance

Figure Figure Figure
Table 1 Table 2 Table 3

 

Figures at a glance

Figure Figure Figure
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3
Figure Figure Figure
Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11620
  • [From(publication date):
    November-2012 - Nov 22, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7863
  • PDF downloads : 3757
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

agriaquaculture@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

biochemjournals@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

business@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

chemistryjournals@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

clinicaljournals@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

engineeringjournals@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

nutritionjournals@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

generalscience@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

geneticsmolbio@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

immunomicrobiol@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

materialsci@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

nursinghealthcare@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

medicaljournals@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

neuropsychology@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

pharmajournals@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

social_politicalsci@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords