alexa A 10-year follow-up of the outcome of lumbar microdiscectomy.
Neurology

Neurology

International Journal of Neurorehabilitation

Author(s): Findlay GF, Hall BI, Musa BS, Oliveira MD, Fear SC

Abstract Share this page

Abstract STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of the outcome of lumbar microdiscectomy, with independent assessment of outcome. OBJECTIVES: To explore whether the initial positive outcome after microdiscectomy is maintained at long-term follow-up. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous reports on long-term outcome after lumbar disc surgery give conflicting messages about whether an initially positive surgical outcome is maintained throughout a 10-year period. This is partly due to differing methods and the failure to include initial outcome, thereby permitting assessment of possible deterioration in the quality of outcome. METHODS: This study presents the initial and long-term outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy, with an independent assessment of outcome. Eighty-eight consecutive patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy were identified. Assessment at 10 years after surgery was obtained in 79 (90\%) of the cases. The initial outcome was assessed retrospectively by an independent observer at 6 months after surgery using the Macnab classification. The final outcome Macnab classification was completed by postal questionnaire by the patients themselves, who also completed a modified Roland-Morris disability questionnaire. RESULTS: A successful outcome at 6 months was achieved in 91\% of the cases. At 10-year follow-up, this result declined slightly to an 83\% success rate. However, there was no statistically significant difference between these outcome results. The long-term Macnab classification results correlated well with disability, as measured by the Roland-Morris score. Patient satisfaction with the results of microdiscectomy 10 years later was high. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar microdiscectomy achieves a high level of initial success, and this positive outcome is maintained at a 10-year follow-up.
This article was published in Spine (Phila Pa 1976) and referenced in International Journal of Neurorehabilitation

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords