alexa A case-control study of risk factors for invasive cervical cancer among U.S. women exposed to oncogenic types of human papillomavirus.
Reproductive Medicine

Reproductive Medicine

Gynecology & Obstetrics

Author(s): Shields TS, Brinton LA, Burk RD, Wang SS, Weinstein SJ

Abstract Share this page

Oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) infections, the necessary cause of most cervical cancers, are common and usually clear within 1 to 2 years. Identifying cofactors that lead to cancer among HPV-infected women has depended mainly on case-control studies defining HPV by DNA testing. DNA testing assesses only current infection; thus, concerns about residual confounding remain. To assess cofactors, we used seropositivity to five oncogenic HPV types as a marker of past exposure and confined our analysis to seropositive controls compared with cancer cases. Study subjects had participated in a multicenter U.S. case-control study conducted in the early 1980s. The detailed questionnaire and stored sera for 235 cases of squamous carcinoma and 486 controls motivated the reanalysis. We measured antibodies to HPV types 16, 18, 31, 45, and 52. Independent, significant predictors of seropositivity among controls included numbers of sexual partners, Black race, and oral contraceptive use. Condom use was protective. Among HPV-exposed women, Papanicolaou screening, Black race, and yeast infection were significantly associated with reduced cancer risk. Current smoking was associated with a 2-fold increase in risk; there were independent, significant trends of increased risk with numbers of cigarettes smoked (P for trend = 0.003) and years of smoking (P for trend = 0.01). Other significant predictors of increased risk included low education and income and history of nonspecific genital infection. Unlike recent HPV DNA-based investigations, based on the use of HPV-seropositive controls in this study, oral contraceptive use was unrelated to the risk of cervical cancer and multiparity was only weakly related to risk. It is particularly worth considering further why studies of different designs are inconsistent regarding the effect of oral contraceptive use.

  • To read the full article Visit
  • Open Access
This article was published in Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. and referenced in Gynecology & Obstetrics

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version