alexa A comparison of 4 airway devices on cervical spine alignment in cadaver models of global ligamentous instability at c1-2.
Anesthesiology

Anesthesiology

Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research

Author(s): Wendling AL, Tighe PJ, Conrad BP, Baslanti TO, Horodyski M,

Abstract Share this page

Abstract BACKGROUND: The effects of advanced airway management on cervical spine alignment in patients with upper cervical spine instability are uncertain. METHODS: To examine the potential for mechanical disruption during endotracheal intubation in cadavers with unstable cervical spines, we performed a prospective observational cohort study with 3 cadaver subjects. We created an unstable, type II odontoid fracture with global ligamentous instability at C1-2 in lightly embalmed cadavers, followed by repetitive intubations with 4 different airway devices (Airtraq laryngoscope, Lightwand, intubating laryngeal mask airway [LMA], and Macintosh laryngoscope) while manual in-line stabilization was applied. Motion analysis data were collected using an electromagnetic device to assess the degree of angular movement in 3 axes (flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending) during the intubation trials with each device. Intubation was performed by either an emergency medical technician or attending anesthesiologist. RESULTS: Overall, 153 intubations were recorded with the 4 devices. The Lightwand technique resulted in significantly less flexion-extension and axial rotation at C1-2 than with the intubating LMA (mean difference in flexion-extension 3.2° [95\% confidence interval {CI}, 0.9°-5.5°], P = 0.003; mean difference in axial rotation 1.6° [95\% CI, 0.3°-2.8°], P = 0.01) and Macintosh laryngoscope (mean difference in flexion-extension 3.1° [95\% CI, 0.8°-5.4°], P = 0.005; mean difference in axial rotation 1.4° [95\% CI 0.1°-2.6°], P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In cadavers with instability at C1-2, the Lightwand technique produced less motion than the Macintosh and intubating LMA.
This article was published in Anesth Analg and referenced in Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords