alexa A comparison of articaine and lidocaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks.
Medicine

Medicine

Emergency Medicine: Open Access

Author(s): Mikesell P, Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck M, Weaver J

Abstract Share this page

Abstract The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to compare the degree of pulpal anesthesia obtained with 4\% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2\% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in inferior alveolar nerve blocks. Using a crossover design, inferior alveolar nerve blocks were randomly administered, in a double-blind manner, using 4\% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2\% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, at two separate appointments, to 57 subjects. A pulp tester was used to test for anesthesia, in 4-min cycles for 60 min, of the molars, premolars, central, and lateral incisors. Anesthesia was considered successful when two consecutive 80 readings were obtained within 15 min and the 80 reading was continuously sustained for 60 min. Using the articaine solution, successful pulpal anesthesia ranged from 4 to 54\% from the central incisor to the second molar. Using the lidocaine solution, successful pulpal anesthesia ranged from 2 to 48\%. There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the articaine and lidocaine solutions. We concluded that 4\% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine was similar to 2\% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in inferior alveolar nerve blocks.
This article was published in J Endod and referenced in Emergency Medicine: Open Access

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords